Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Twitter is getting the BANT stick all over the NFL


Kurb

Recommended Posts

For as cute as the twitter technology seems on the service there is NO way Twitter can control the real power of this novelty. Twitter will remain in the news for all sorts of reasons and may just end up being the next Napster if enough people get together and claim that what is theirs is being shared without consent or compensation.

Any camp or any practice of any team in any sport can stick a webcam in the vicinity of their practice area and post a ridiculous price on their website selling access and then sue the poo out of anybody whoever tweets anything from their facility claiming "stolen content" and shut this Twitter / Sports relationship down real quick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

did you all catch the commentary on ESPN, i think on PTI, about Twittering in the NFL v. NBA. Basically they said the NBA was allowing it because of the star-based marketing nature of their team, while the NFL didnt due to the team-based marketing scheme. made a lot of sense. i think alot of players are trying to promote their individual brands, see Chad Ocho-CInco... twitter is defiantly helping them connect to fans on a much more individual basis, than their teams would like. certainly, a great example of this is the kemo situation, but more pointedly beason's ankle, where he tweeted about the status of his injury before the team released anything. bad news, the nfl owns a monopoly over their players and more importantly the information about their players. this is an uber-powerful marketing tool. and in fact is what the nfl tends to sell over everything else. it builds excitement over the week, and eventually brings the fan to the tv on sunday. this is what espn is for, except, because unlike twitter, the station can be controlled by the league. twitter threatens this monopoly on information because the nfl loses control over when and how it is distributed. unlike the nba, which has tomorrow nights game to promote itself, the nfl must sustain interest over an entire week. twitters free flow of information is why the nfl will not allow it. until they can legitimately control it, the old adage remains the same, loose twitter feeds sink ships.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's cheating!

j/k

I think they can ban players from tweeting during working hours (practices, meetings) and discussing actual team news.

But they can't ban reporters from tweeting (except during live games I think.)

They can pull a reporter's credentials. Sure, he could sit in the regular viewing area, but if they pull his credentials, he's not privy to coach and player availability after practice, etc. Not sure a legitimate reporter would want to give that up just because he couldn't Tweet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The NFL is fighting a losing battle of controlling information about itself. It wants to become the only place you can read about, see pictures of, or watch anything to do with its teams, thats its goal within the next 5 years. The good news is they are fairly clueless and will realize what a waste of time and money it was within 2.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

'Twitter' itself is not to blame here. Its technology in general. If NFL dumps twitter the public will just find another outlet. The only real way to control it is to ban phones and laptops at camp/practice/games etc. Which is basically impossible. Anyhow, what ever happened to America and rights to free press?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well I can see coaches' concerns vis a vis injury info coming out via either player of fans at practice twittering or tweeting or whatever. If I were a HC I would would tell my players that any info about injuries than has not been expressly announced by me on your tweets, you get a fine. Same for any info about plays worked on at practices that are closed to the public/media. If I am concerned about fans tweeting about specific things I want my team to work on, I close that practice to the public. Media already knows Fox's policy on giving out info in their articles about specific plays (Fox does not allow it or access is revoked I believe).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

'Twitter' itself is not to blame here. Its technology in general. If NFL dumps twitter the public will just find another outlet. The only real way to control it is to ban phones and laptops at camp/practice/games etc. Which is basically impossible. Anyhow, what ever happened to America and rights to free press?

..those rights are still there they just infringe on capitalism and privacy (also civil liberties). And therein lies the issue.

The freedom of the press was part of a system of checks and balances put in place by the founding fathers to thwart tyranny. In no way was free press drafted into the constitution because the founding fathers intended to protect individuals in the futures who wish to seek profit at the expense of privacy and/or enterprise.

Many people today are confused about what "free press" is. I'll give you a hint, twitter does not fit the profile. Mainly because twitter is not "press" at all, at least not anything resembling responsible journalism that is.

This open-source novelty is already spilling over into what people consider to be responsible and trustworthy sources for media. The fact that there are no links to trusted sources and that anybody with a cell phone can contribute contaminates what is unique about a message board altogether. I don't hate Twitter but I think it has its own place.

If you are hawking somebodies tweets, fine. Just don't regurgitate that random person's blabber as a story and bait those who don't care with your best johnny newsroom thread title. This holds true no matter how "trusted you feel the source is. A, what you think is trusted, others may not and B, there are many reasons why there is a gap between the time when a reporter learns something and when that story hits the masses.

Twitter fans who are also forum fans should be able to do us all the favor of keeping the tweets on the tweet page. I thought it was neat too, before it spilled into the main forum disguised as some major scoop.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh he would absolutely flourish. It’s the panthers way. It’s no different with coaches. Sometimes they reach their expiration date, go somewhere else, and find new success.  Similarly to Burns, how long to wait for the light to finally turn on?  Market forces will demand a salary that the panthers can not responsibly match. Sliding him to guard will fit his skill set better, but he has played LT for 3 years. He will receive offers from other teams wanting to pay him LT money.  At guard, he won’t start with what they have paid Hunt and Lewis. Center then?? Dunno. Maybe? He will become a backup by default once they draft their stud LT. I doubt Dan just stands pat. That’s not his MO.  So where does this put him? Can you match what other teams will offer for a backup LT/guard? Do you dish out franchise LT $ on a guy who still needs significant improvement in pass protection. This team will be DOA in the playoffs with the very first team who has a formidable speed rusher. What if he has hit his ceiling in pass protection already and they sign him long term? It’s a big gamble either way. 
    • We're in a great position to see just how big of a misstep it would be, having made so many ourselves
    • I didn't say I would have done it. I was just saying that I can see why some in the FO considered it. Everything was done to give Bryce weapons. Solidify the interior line thru FA. Get XL at WR in round 1 and then get the most talented RB in round 2. Take a TE in round 4, etc They were probably "assuming" he'd make a complete recovery during the 2024 season. I'm a skeptical person. I wouldn't have assumed he'd be ok in 2024. I personally would have taken another position in the 2nd for that very reason. But, if I were "influenced" to take him I would've argued to keep him off the field, especially seeing how things were going for us record wise. Conventional Wisdom says most backs don't get back to normal until two years after the ACL surgery. He was injured in Fall 2023. Having him suit up in 2025 would have been almost 2 years since the original injury. You have him for 3 year on low contract. If he balls out, you resign him for a couple of more years b/c he'd only have 3 years of tread on the tires. If he's ok but not great you let him walk. 
×
×
  • Create New...