Trading later round picks

[firefox1234]

I would say yes if a quality player is just out of reach especially around the 3rd to 4th rds where quality can be found

[TylerVagyler]

stupid poll

[frash.exe]

Who gives a poo unless you're looking for a pro bowl caliber fullback really

[Guest Irv]

wasnt greg hardy a 6th round pick?

[Ricky Spanish]

I'm all for it. What did the saints give up to move up to 20 in order to draft cooks? a 5th rounder and their 1st? 

 

worth it in my opinion. It's when you go full hurney and trade away future high draft picks that you get in trouble. 

[TheMostInterestingMan]

I'm all for it. What did the saints give up to move up to 20 in order to draft cooks? a 5th rounder and their 1st?

worth it in my opinion. It's when you go full hurney and trade away future high draft picks that you get in trouble.

1st and 3rd

[bleys]

exceptions don't make the rule..  for the most part they are useless picks.  If a GM has his eyes on a guy and only has to give up 6's and 7's to do so then by all means don't think twice.

[firefox1234]

wasnt greg hardy a 6th round pick?

Good point but in all honesty that was as lucky as most teams will get, u can most likely find just as many quality guys as UDFAs

[Jackofalltrades]

C - depends on a lot of other factors

[top dawg]

It's not as cut and dried as your options would suggest.

[Ricky Spanish]

1st and 3rd

 

 

then I stand corrected. 

[DangerClose]

Hardy was a 6th round pick...so...no....keep the picks and go for value

[bleys]

Hardy was a 6th round pick...so...no....keep the picks and go for value

 

"one time this actually worked out ...  so no..  obviously greg hardy makes the rule"

[Jangler]

I voted just in time... lol