Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers director of college scouting Don Gregory believes "capable" starting receivers can be as found as late as the fourth round


Ja  Rhule

Recommended Posts

So while I hope we go WR then OT, if there is a run on WR and OT in the first round to where Jarvis Landry and Billy Turner are the best available, you have to use your 28th overall on someone a hell of a lot better than that.

 

The complete post was excellent, I just fixed the end a little bit to my liking

Link to comment
Share on other sites

a) you choose an extreme exception to counter a general statement. This is intellectual laziness. That is like when someone makes a claim that people who smoke tend to live a shorter lives and someone chimes in with "well my grand dad was a smoker and lived to be 120!" It changes nothing and is irrelevant.

 

 

 

 

the above should be required reading to register for any forum on the entire interwebz

 

bravo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We are still going BPA...you don't skip over BPA just because the class at his position is deep...won't happen.

 

 

I think that you're correct, but let me add that it's not a perfect science. So where the differences in perceived value may be the same or minuscule, a drafts perceived depth at one position may be a determining factor regarding whom you actually pick at the top.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we can find a game changing defensive player like a shut down corner we would be smart to ****** them.  Honestly we can find a wide receiver in the third round who is very close to a guy we can find at the end of the first round.  It isn't as if the 7th best receiver is that different from the 15 best receiver in this draft.  On the other hand the second best corner might be significantly better than the 5th or 6th ranked guy.  The same thing applies to an OL guy who is starter material.  If the drop off is dramatic after the first 5 guys but isn't at WR you have to pull the trigger and go elsewhere.  OL will help Cam more than another receiver.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we can find a game changing defensive player like a shut down corner we would be smart to ****** them.  Honestly we can find a wide receiver in the third round who is very close to a guy we can find at the end of the first round.  It isn't as if the 7th best receiver is that different from the 15 best receiver in this draft.  On the other hand the second best corner might be significantly better than the 5th or 6th ranked guy.  The same thing applies to an OL guy who is starter material.  If the drop off is dramatic after the first 5 guys but isn't at WR you have to pull the trigger and go elsewhere.  OL will help Cam more than another receiver.

 

I think all of this is a fallacy.  We hear it every year pre-draft, yet virtually every year, a couple of those prospects that were bunched up so tightly together as prospects usually end up being head and shoulders above the pack.  Just because all of the analysts say that these 6-8 or however many prospects are closely ranked doesn't mean the scouts and GMs agree.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Will a 4th round WR from this draft become a long-term NFL starter?  Very possibly.

Will teams pass on a guy who they think will become a long-term NFL starter at WR three times in most cases and four times in some cases?  Not a chance in hell.

 

A 4th rounder who becomes a long-term starter is more of a case of getting lucky than it is being a genius and seeing something that other teams didn't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

b ) Even in the example you provided you gave a third rounder. There is a huge drop off in talent from 3 to 4. Much more drastic than between rounds 2 and 3 or even 1 and 2. By the 4th round the best players of all the positions are gone, everyone else is a much greater crap shoot.

 

So, I will add just a few more....

 

Steve Largent....4th round

TJ Houshmandzaheh...7th rund

Joe Horn....5th round

Stevie Johnson....7th round

Marques Colston...7th round

Shannon Sharpe....7th round

Mike Wallace....3rd round

Emmanuel Sanders....3rd round

Antonio Brown....6th round

 

So....your statement was total bullshit (as usual).  Now STFU. :jig:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The art of playing QB is to throw the ball hard enough to get there and as soft/catchable as possible for the receiver. NFL history is littered with insanely strong-armed passers that coaches were hoping they could teach to be accurate and throw a catchable ball.  Almost all ended in failure.  Turns out it's a lot harder to teach a QB to be accurate than to have the proper technique to get enough zip on the ball to make the pass. The NFL isn't Madden. Very, very few games have a lot of opportunities for throwing the ball 40+ yards in the air unless there is a coverage bust. BY9 has been the least accurate throwing deep (vs short or intermediate), but most of his misses have been long, not short.   I would love for an actual example where Bryce couldnt get the ball there.  There are quite a few examples where BY9s mechanics were bad and the ball lacked zip bc of that. Young needs to stick to good footwork to generate the power needed for some throws. That certainly doesnt mean he cant do it, but like someone like Brees, he needs to throw the ball in rhythm and with good footwork. Young doesn't have an arm that pops like a Josh Allen or Cam, but to act like he can't put zip on the ball is insane and objectively just wrong. I'm personally pumped as hell to see BY9 develop chemistry, especially with someone like JT Sanders he can trust on jump balls. Elite QBs have to make throws from the pocket in synch with the play design, but sometimes the play breaks down and you need a guy you can trust to get a jump ball one-on-one to keep the chains moving and the defense honest. As mentioned, Delhomme somewhat made a living here throwing YOLO balls up to Smitty. I'm personally excited to see what BY9 can do the rest of the season along with the defense hopefully doing somewhat better. Given the entire body of work so far, I don't see a scenario where BY9 should be anointed the starter next season (and we need to bring in legit competition), but Young has shown enough since he came back from his benching to play the rest of the season and be back to compete for the starting job next season IMHO. I'm open to any reasonable debate about that fact.  Just like everyone else here, I want to see the Panthers win first & foremost. With or without BY9. Sunday was the first game (maybe GB last year), where Young looked like a guy worthy of the #1 pick.  I think that is objectively true, even as someone who has been more pro-Young than a lot of this board. There's a long ways to go before even committing to him as the long-term QB, but these last few weeks have shown the first real signs of promise. That should be encouraging to everyone who cares about this team.  
    • The reasonable part I think will be tough. IMO, I don't really think he is going to want to resign with us. He seems to be an "emotions on his sleeve" guy that really hates losing. That's not really going to be changing much before his contract will be up. If we want to keep him around it will have to be by tagging or overpaying, IMO.
×
×
  • Create New...