Player / Coach · 2 threads
RB · CAR · PPR Rank #373
**Position:** Running Back **College:** Georgia **Drafted:** 2025 NFL Draft, Round 4 **Height:** 5'9" **Weight:** 198 lbs ## Biography Trevor Etienne entered the NFL after productive stops at both Florida and Georgia, developing into one of college football's most versatile offensive weapons. As the younger brother of NFL running back Travis Etienne Jr., he carved out his own reputation through quickness, balance, and receiving ability. Carolina selected Etienne to add speed and versatility to its backfield. His collegiate experience in multiple offensive systems prepared him to contribute as both a runner and pass catcher. As a rookie, Etienne enters training camp competing for offensive touches while providing another dynamic option alongside Chuba Hubbard and Rico Dowdle. ## Strengths - Agility - Burst - Receiving ability - Elusiveness - Acceleration - Open-field vision ## Playing Style Etienne is an explosive change-of-pace runner who thrives in space. His ability to make defenders miss and contribute as a receiver makes him a versatile offensive weapon capable of creating mismatches.
The discussion centers on the Carolina Panthers' running back situation, specifically focusing on Chuba Hubbard's performance and rankings. Members express concerns about Hubbard being rated too low (52nd) among NFL running backs but believe he can still be effective with regular carries. The thread also mentions potential backups like Jonathon Brooks and the possibility of adding free agents such as Nick Chubb and Kareem Hunt to strengthen the backfield. Overall, while the backfield poses a concern, there is optimism that it can be managed effectively.
The thread discusses criticism from Sports Illustrated's Zach Roberts regarding the Carolina Panthers' running back situation, stating that the team lacks a good RB room. Fans argue that while there are injury concerns, players like Chuba Hubbard and Jonathon Brooks have potential, and question the validity of labeling the RB unit as bad. They express skepticism towards local sports writers, suggesting some content is clickbait rather than genuine analysis.