rayzor

He's going to make a lot of noise, get drafted, and then.....

Would this work?

I can roll with this. I want so badly to win a lot of games this year, but I need to be content with just trending towards better and building something sustainable.

Lol I turned over every pick.

got a bunch of picks from the rams...or chargers. they all look alike.

trade back for more picks or maybe a shuffling that allows us to trade one of our later picks for an earlier one...that's acceptable as well. i just want to make sure that we don't lose any of the number of picks we have. keep the same number or get more.

i get told i'm pretty dramatic by my kids all the time.

i'd be very comfortable with that.

tell me about it. i mean can you do that? then i guess you just go BPA the rest of the way. soooo tempting to take advantage of something like that. i mean with those top three picks you're set for a good few years.

Him and Baker I keep forgetting about. Those two and Burton are going to be falling through some cracks and wind up helping out some teams.

boom or bust is how i'm viewing him as well. he will either be absolutely fantastic or just kind of fizzle. for some reason i'm just not 100% convinced on him(maybe 80-85%?). now if he's the guy we take in the 2nd round i'm still going to be stoked, but there's this seed of doubt in my head concerning him. i'd actually feel more comfortable with someone like pearsall. i'm thinking the guys that i feel the most confident in are MHjr, Nabers, Odunze, Thomas, AD Mitchell, Coleman, and Pearsall. I think those guys are the safest bets. The guys i feel really good but not great about are McConkey, Corley, Leggette, Wilson, X Worthy, Baker, Polk, and Burton (not in order, btw) For some reason Troy Franklin, Washington, and Dez Walker just have me a little skittish. Not sure why on any of them. These are all gut checks that i've noticed when i'm doing my mocks. I don't have anything statistically or quantitatively to base this on.

this one started off nicely, but it didn't take long for it to lean towards meh. the trick is knowing where positions you would like to take care of will fall off a cliff. there might be a guy or two you like at a certain spot, but if you are committed to getting the best players possible for a few positions, you have to know what you have available at each, because if you aren't paying attention you'll wind up with a whole pile of blah after your two or three good picks.

looking forward to playing around with this. seems like a good way to burn some time.

It would be a UDFA that hangs out on the practice squad.We won't use a pick on a QB.

Pearsall = safe bet

because all we do is look backward and groan and complain and think that it's only going to look the same going forward.

i would love him on the team, but i would love him even more if we had one of those multi-role guys or some kind of separation specialists drafted. but i also have to think about who we added to the WR room in diontae johnson. could he be enough that we wouldn't need to draft one of those guys and can just draft a big guy like Leggette?

I'd complain, but I'd also still watch.

We don't need stars. The more stars you have, the more money they get. The more money they get, the less you have to spread around. The less you have to spread around, the more top heavy you get. The more top heavy you are, the more likely you are to fall on your face. Build a strong foundation made up of solid players, not stars, but solid players who want to fight glory rather than the big pay day. Good teams are built in the shoulders of a foundation of "average Joe's" who have that fight in them.

i guess it was williams then. it's turning into a blur for me