rayzor

we might be able to get him for a third and maybe a day 2 pick next year. would be worth it even for a 2nd this year. i would not be upset at all. if we can pull off DHop and Chark i'd be ecstatic.

What a clusterf*ck of a thread.

You made a thread asking to have someone explain this to youso you can understand. The problem is you won't change your mind about it. You don't like the move. You think you know what this team/coaching staff needs or wants to do and how to do it better than them. If this was still the Rhule/Wilks era, which you might fit better in, that might be the case. We're dealing with guys that know offense now and know how to be successful. Probably the best thing for you to do is just watch because you're really not interested in any conversation.

Maybe they aren't satisfied with just being fine, bro.

You make it sound like Sanders is a hack scrub. You haven't been paying attention or you are just overly biased if you think that's the case. Or you're just drunk and you just want to argue about something.

If we were doing the same poo as last year, Foreman would have been fine and the status quo would have been enough. Apparently we got a new coaching staff that is not going to be satisfied with the status quo and is going to do things that require a different kind of back from Foreman and that Hubbard might have some similarities to style-wise, but a better quality than Hubbard was needed, which we got. Sanders is better/more talented/more versatile than Foreman and Miles ahead of Hubbard.

What if he promises to not get hurt?

i would love to keep him around, but yeah i think someone else is going to want him and pay him what he may have earned last year.

step one to this is hiring experienced NFL people to start with.

Good for him. Better for us.

That would be the simplest answer.

Btw....I'm on the Foreman + Sanders would be brutal for defenses. Please make it happen.

I changed the title to match the genius that is Joe Person

"Tom Brady's successor"

same here. 2 of those three and i'd feel fairly good about the WR. not great...but ok.

it definitely wouldn't hurt. shouldn't be too expensive. he's got a good bit of talent and we could definitely use him. no way should he be the only addition, but he'd be a good one.

i've said it before....i think they probably have a gut feeling of who it will be and now it's just a matter of making sure they are going to be making the right decision. They probably obviously feel good about one or two others, but i think they probably know who they want. next month and a half is just going to be assuring themselves that they are picking the right guy. i'm sure a lot of the decision will be based on schemes that they are no doubt trying to come up with when thinking about each player. which ever one excites them more will likely get the job.

wouldn't hurt my feelings if we picked up another TE like Austin Hooper.

i like it. dude is a baller and a brawler. great safety outlet for the new QB. and it looks like we're collecting all the gingers lol.

after June 1

this year it's playoffs and win the division. next year it's a deep playoff run, maybe NFCCG. by year three, especially with him drafting his QB this year, Superbowl in year three. If he doesn't win one in year 4 it probably won't happen. If a coach/QB combo is going to win a Superbowl together, it's likely going to happen within the first 3 maybe 4 years or not at all.

Nobody liked Derek Anderson either. Turned out to be good for Cam.

I did not agree to this

same. i don't know how long or how much was packed into those interviews, but Young would have really had to have blown them away for him to overcome both Stroud and apparently AR. Stroud's tape, plus combine performance has to have put him in the lead.

damn impressive.