Jump to content

TheCasillas

HUDDLER
  • Posts

    12,273
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by TheCasillas

  1. Stats are right, I agree with that. However, it is clear as day that the call was a run play. While else would DJ and Ian engage in blocks and Elf pull? Unless it was a screen play but I believe that would be OPI on DJ.
  2. it was our second posession, I dont think the Browns knew our "game plan" yet.
  3. I despise Elf... but outside of his snap issues (which i think he should be benched for) he played pretty well yesterday. It was surprising.
  4. Actually, it wasnt disguised. Baker audbled CMC to go from his right side to his left to pickup the middle blitzer. I dont think T-Mo realized this. T-Mo should have shoved Clowney inside and then switched over to the blitzer. Regardless, Baker should have saw this coming.
  5. that was a run play called. lol. Center is pulling. Ian is blocking , DJ is blocking and RA is running a decoy streak on the strong side of the field.
  6. it was 3rd and 7... i dont think many teams would call a run defense in that situation.
  7. Not all of those were off tackle runs by design. We met Chubb in the backfield a handful of times, just couldnt wrap him up and he broke it to the outside. Cleveland had over 180 yards after contact. It doesnt appear to be a gap integrity issue (excep the hunt touchdown run) it appears to be a tackling issue. That being said.... Chubb is fuging elite.
  8. I actually was echooing the same thing in our game day thread. However, after watching the replays... as much as I dont want to give him the credit..... Ian was the extra blocker on MG on our 3 big plays in the 2nd half.
  9. I agree. We did. That was my complaint on game day. The challenge to running an RPO with the QB making the decisions to pass or hand off when playing in a passionate game against a former team...... the QB wants the ball. Its the opposite of Shane Falco.
  10. another comment, where I just do not understand what you are attempting to state. I am offering rationale and then you give me :
  11. The only option on the play was Tremble, and I am not sure he had enough time to deliver.
  12. It appears we avoided Clowney and Garrett with our run selection.
  13. They threw the ball more than they ran it (not counting scrambles) and 24 of their targets were to recievers and 5 to the RBs. source 13 fo 34 attempts were caught by a WR. How do you now fel confident going into a last minute drive with those numbers? That a 38% completion percentage to their WR/TEs. The data is there to support it.
  14. It looks like that from that angle but from the other Burns hits shoulder pads first and then Jacoby flops HARD. I wish I could post the video but NFL + goes black when I attempt to screen record.
  15. the other piece is that they need a new LT BAD...
  16. The thing about it that gets me... is the commentators said that it was the Browns player who hit Jacoby's helmet and not Burns. So I went back and watched.... take a look: I just cant figure out how this was called.
  17. Their defense is going to need more than a lineman. Plus it’s jerry jones, they are gonna draft a WR.
  18. The browns were averaging less than 4 yards per reception and had less than 140 total pass yards on 30 attempts heading into that final drive. The odds were in our favor. If they don’t call that RTP… it’s 3rd and long with less than a minute to go on their own 25.
  19. Ah I missed that detail. Thanks for the correction.
  20. They won their last opener 18 years ago. You were 11 then, so that would put you at 29. Your son is 11 now, and 11 years ago you would be 18. I’ll admit we had a bottle of red at Dinner. Is my math wrong?
  21. Weird debut for this Hackett guy….
  22. You were 18 when you had your son? Good on you. Being a teenager and having a kid has to be quite the experience. I can’t even imagine.
×
×
  • Create New...