Jump to content

Donald LaFell

HUDDLER
  • Posts

    4,585
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Donald LaFell

  1. It’d be pretty hilarious. Even though Richardson has potential it’d be a bad decision to take a guy who isn’t NFL ready at 1. I think it’d be funny if one day a team trades up to #1 only to trade down multiple times for an overall better haul.
  2. You shouldn’t trade up to #1 to compromise on anything. Smarts/talent can be evaluated subjectively but size is what it is.
  3. I wouldn’t mind drafting a prototype of a “field general” MLB in this draft. I haven’t heard any buzz about one though. I’m glad we’re keeping Shaq for consistency and he’s a solid player. He’s been around a while and provides a connection to teams of the past which I like.
  4. They said it’s a 2 year deal so you might have it on the money.
  5. I’d like to think Corral is worth at least a BLT or Fried Bologna with fresh tomato
  6. I’m not going to fret about it but it’s such a big freaking risk. They better nail it or we’re poo for another 3-4 years, looking for another coach again. I’d rather be conservative but that doesn’t guarantee success either. At least pre-season and this season will be so much more hopeful.
  7. I’d rather not take the risk but the team is kind of in a mediocre purgatory. Have to either blow it up or take a shot. Just hope it doesn’t make all these coaches leave lol
  8. Players rise and fall in projections(and the draft) all the time. There’s no comparison between Richardson and Willis. The comparison is lazy.
  9. Gardner’s resume so far is untouchable, like the Barry Sanders of CBs at this point in time.
  10. I’m excited to see Corral with a QB Guru of a coach. His release is the fastest I can remember, would love if he could make it in the NFL.
  11. I’m pretty surprised how stupid a lot of coaches are. Just hiring whomever.
  12. Yeah the paradox is any QB worth trading up for would never have a team trade out of the #1 spot though. It seems risky but I don’t blame them for trying. I’d rather just stay put and take a chance on Richardson. Or maybe trade up 1-2 spots for Richardson. Nobody in this draft seems like a sure thing. I’d rather not risk it.
  13. This is what I can’t get past. You trade up for stroud then maybe you draft nothing but O-line and receivers for the next 2-3 years for whatever you have left.
  14. I guess Hopkins won’t come here now lol I don’t care how much time has passed that’s gross. Delhomme putting the razzle dazzle on Hall to win that game in 09 was pretty funny though.
  15. I like how everyone seems to have worked in various positions and higher positions than the ones they have here.
  16. I’m glad Tepper is at least trying some different approaches. Hopefully it all sinks in. No guarantees. Building a stable perennial winner would be a massive improvement.
  17. I was gonna be that guy if you were not that guy, so thanks.
  18. I like the experience being brought in but it honestly doesn’t mean a ton if they aren’t on the same page and competent. Time will tell if all this experience pays dividends.
  19. I personally am rooting for Fields but he’s shown nothing to indicate he’s worth a top 10 pick.
  20. Yeah I feel like you can’t be the GOAT and an announcer. He can’t help it but fans will hate him.
  21. Of all the options I think trading up for a rookie is the most reasonable. I still would rather not do it but you can’t fault them if they think that’s the way forward. Trading draft picks for a current QB making tens of millions that might not even work out is a bad bad bad idea. No guarantee Rogers or Jackson would be good here.
  22. We’re just not in a spot to give up a lot of draft capital IMO. The team isn’t a QB away and also isn’t going to get blown up. Outside of a very good deal it just seems like a bad idea.
×
×
  • Create New...