TD alt

https://x.com/Sheena_Marie3/status/1892051814666699253?t=TbV3K7LNa6cR-778D4Ooew&s=19 I mean...I don't know what she's saying or trying to achieve with this one; I don't know what to say. Keep pounding?

You just couldn't say who it is? Come on, man.

I agree, but...you still should draft the BPA and exercise discipline in regards to reaching. Your post speaks to team building as much as anything. That being said, sure college talent is perhaps the main part of that, but free agency should not be overlooked. Zach Baun played a huge part in Philly's championship run. Howie Roseman knows how to build a team (including using free agency), and their scouting department knows how to spot talent.

Starks will go to a team like Pittsburgh and become a potential Hofer.

Garrett has played at an historical level. He's up there with Deacon Jones and Reggie White. Just saying. Parsons may be younger, but he isn't better. -------------- In general, I don't think it's realistic that we trade for either one of them. That's akin to Pyrex fantasy.

Yeah, I'm a Georgia alum, and I don't see Walker as elite...not yet, anyway.

Both of whom are likely outside the top 10, just saying.

Go Dawgs!

Yeah, some people in this thread are letting their Smitty hate show. Cam shouldn't have said what he said, period. Smitty could've reacted a lot worse, as could CJ. Some others probably have some thoughts on the issue as well. You don't throw your teammates under the bus in public. Cam has certainly lost some cool points.

I mean, Eagles' fans booed Santa Claus. So...

"Trouble creating separation" is a bit much from what I've seen and have been reading.

I'll pass at that number.

According to what I've read, any "talent" at edge outside of like three guys is highly speculative. So there may be guys there, but they're not exactly grading out as guys that can come in and make an immediate impact; It's more like any draft.

Because it's in your blood.

It's not even really a Huddle thing, even analysts think that we need to get Bryce another legit weapon. Losing to the Chiefs and Eagles still equals two losses at the end of the day. Beating the Falcons the second time around was great, but our record was not. We made strides, but hooking our bandwagon to an old guy is not ideal. I say just draft the BPA, if that happens to be McMillan if he's still on the board, it is what it is. If it's Malaki Starks (or possibly Carter or Graham, both if whom I think will be gone), I'm good with that too. FA will go a long way towards determining what's what.

I like McMillan as well, but it's not a surety that he's a WR1 (and there's no surety that he's destined to be the best WR in this class). That being said, at the moment I'd say he'd be a good bet.

Best player available. If that's a WR, then it is what it is. Sorry (not sorry). You don't reach for a player at a position of need because you feel like it. Reaching is arguably how we ended up where we are today. Thielen is not a WR1, it doesn't look like Legette is either. Coker isn't a WR1. We arguably have three guys with WR2 upside (if we're lucky...which we're not). WR is on our list of needs, whether you like it or not. You look at what you're in the market for, choose the player with the highest grade, and put in your card. If you can trade down to gain value, then you can consider that as well. This is how this works.

Nevermind, different scenario

I remember when some people were complaining that we overpaid. Remember that?

Dude, there were questionable calls both ways. At the end of the day, Josh missed it by a hair. All of you conspiracy theorists are just going to have to deal with the fact that the Chiefs simply own the Bills, and it's going to take something spectacular for them to break out of jail. But their in the jail cell with everyone else in the AFC.

Don't leave me out.

Now you've jinxed us!

OK, I am wrong on that if that's true, but it's still meant to elicit some type of reaction to mention him and Megatron in the same breath, as Megatron was mainly known for his size-speed combination than his actual catch radius. Hell, there have been plenty of guys with arguably a better catch radius than Megatron, two that we should be very familiar with in the aforementioned Mike Evans, and Julio Jones. Julio may have been the greatest of them all. Megatron may be somewhere down the list, but Jones and Evans are probably more closer to the gold standard as far as catch radius is concerned.

@tukafan21 is admittedly biased, and I'm gonna admit that I kinda laugh and purse my lips and raise my eyebrows simultaneously when he says that Tet is going to be the next Megatron, but even if Tet can give you 75 percent of what Mike Evans has given the Bucs, then I'd take that in a heartbeat. The thing is, just from the eye test, I think that Tet may be a tad more fluid and a tad faster than Evans. He may be somewhere between Evans and CJ in regards to speed and athleticism, but even if his potential is that of Evans, that's great because Mike Evans has been one of the most productive receivers of a generation. Even with 4.5 speed, Evans has been generational. So, I don't care if Tet runs a sub 4.5 40 or not. Hell, Keenan Allen was a 4.6 guy. The same for Cooper Kupp. Tee Higgins is damned near a 4.6 guy. I say this to say that sometimes speed is overrated. One thing that we can say is that Tet absolutely has flypaper hands, and he looks to be a matchup nightmare due to his ability to make catches and his catch radius alone.