-
Posts
2,121 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Recent Profile Visitors
7,424 profile views
TD alt's Achievements
-
I haven't seen anyone suggesting trading a fourth, but if they are that's crazy. As far as "deemed not good enough [yada yada yada]," that doesn't move me. Stefanski is the one being foolish. There are loads of Browns fans that think Sanders should be (and should've been) playing. With what Dillon Gabriel (Stefanski's guy) has displayed, there is really no good reason to see what they have in Shedeur at this point. None.
-
Stop scapegoating passing game's failures on the receivers
TD alt replied to TD alt's topic in Carolina Panthers
I might add, that I'm not the only one that sees McMillan's growing frustration. He's doing well, but he's being held back, just like every other receiver on the roster. -
Stop scapegoating passing game's failures on the receivers
TD alt replied to TD alt's topic in Carolina Panthers
Possibly, but possibly not... -
Stop scapegoating passing game's failures on the receivers
TD alt replied to TD alt's topic in Carolina Panthers
Think what you want, but as was pointed out, when X was actually targeted, he caught nine of 11 balls. How that translates to being "clearly" a bust doesn't quite translate under the circumstances in my opinion. Again, Chris Lea in the other video, said X is getting open "a lot" if you actually study him on the All-22 video. -
Stop scapegoating passing game's failures on the receivers
TD alt replied to TD alt's topic in Carolina Panthers
I don't know that any receiver is completely blameless. Can't say much about a "Goober" vibe, because I think all of the guys in Raleigh that talk Panthers are much more on the money than anyone else, ESPN or not. Donnelly also played QB (can't remember the school), so he has some inside knowledge about this stuff. Donnelly, Dennis Cox and Chris Lea feel the pain and call the bullshit. Adam Gold isn't a fan, per sé, but he's just as analytical and criticalm -
Nothing is absolute, but the fact is is that Bryce is the QB. He's the only one that touches the ball nearly every single play. The offense flows through him (or not). There are degrees to this, and shades of truth and fiction, and everything in between, as to why there is failure between he and any receiver not named Tetairoa. And even Tetairoa is unfortunately getting some undue blame if you look what's happening on social media.
-
Both can actually be true depending on style of play. My thing is, Bryce is not maximizing the skills of the players that we have. They could be so much more. I'm willing to bet that this will become apparent once circumstances change.
-
I am referencing McMillan, but even he--anyone--can get very discouraged working with someone who isn't doing their job. If you're trying to be a team and have (for lack of a nicer word) a bum day in and day out affecting your work, and maybe even affecting it profoundly, at some point you're likely to just say, "fug it, it is what it is," and wonder what the damned point is. "Why am I working my ass off trying to carry this dude? No one really appreciates it. He's making me look bad..." Now I'm not saying it's right, and I'm not even saying that there aren't the types that will keep on pressing on, regardless, but what I am saying is that it's not exactly human nature to keep giving it your all in a totally fuged up situation. In regards to X, I can't---I'm talking me personally---get 100 percent mad at him or call him an absolute bust or lost cause, because of sub par play that isn't even in the neighborhood of actually meeting his strengths. Now I have been a little out on watching all the film I can (not that I have beaucoup access) just from being..."out," but if you listened to Chris Lea on the vid, he emphasized that X is getting open "a lot," intimating of course that Bryce isn't getting the ball to him. I've also seen another vid about how Bryce seems to be locking on to T-Mac (or the check-down option). Assuming these guys are right, then anyone should be able to understand why Legette is discouraged, even if they don't agree with how he's reacting to it. All that being said, again, even old dogs get tired. Until we get a new QB, it's a little rich to be giving up on our skill position players. I have noticed that there have been disagreements about ball placement, effort, and whether a ball was catchable a lot by Huddlers, and all I have to say is that this shouldn't be well into Bryce Young's third year. We seem to be nitpicking and disagreeing about things of that nature, and it all comes down to the QB being the wrong answer for this offense.
-
Signing an old retread to be the starter is about as uninspiring as watching paint dry. You have a true QB competition and let the chips fall where they may.
-
Well, since no one has posted it...
-
Canales is telling us, but we aren’t listening
TD alt replied to ProcessBlue2's topic in Carolina Panthers
I agree somewhat, but there aren't any solid options, at least in my mind, so... -
Canales is telling us, but we aren’t listening
TD alt replied to ProcessBlue2's topic in Carolina Panthers
Bringing in old Joe or Jameis to battle for your QB1 is a lost cause. Why would you put limitations on Lance? There is no good reason to. In a true competition, you let the play, pure and simple, determine the job status. Too many times, coaches and execs are taking all these additional things into account while QBs battle in a farce of a competition, because the starter has virtually been slotted in the top spot from the beginning. -
Set in their ways? How about just plain idiotic?
-
Canales is telling us, but we aren’t listening
TD alt replied to ProcessBlue2's topic in Carolina Panthers
It is way too early to call Lance a bust. That's the whole point. Lance has ONLY had FIVE starts in his career. He was very very young and inexperienced coming into the league. He never had to play with the big dogs until in the NFL. He never had any business being drafted on day one (and maybe at all). That being said, he showed progress this past preseason, of course in limited work. If you want to label him a legit bust, then some of the retreads you're thinking about have to be busts also. We know what they are however, and unless someone is lying, no one really knows what Lance is yet. If we can acquire him, we can find out what he is during the same time that the Saints are finding out what Shough is and the Falcons are finding out what Penix is. I'm not suggesting that he is a future starter, but I'm saying that we don't know what he is due to his circumstances coming into the league. Being over-drafted does not set up a young, inexperienced QB for success in any shape, fashion or form. I am loath to desire a retread, who will likely win largely meaningless games, and perennially screw up our ability to get a legit QB organically in the draft.
