Jump to content

TD alt

HUDDLER
  • Posts

    2,750
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Recent Profile Visitors

8,892 profile views

TD alt's Achievements

Grand Master

Grand Master (14/14)

  • One Year In Rare
  • Posting Machine Rare
  • One Month Later
  • Week One Done
  • Dedicated Rare

Recent Badges

2.3k

Reputation

  1. Dude, you're way off base. Concepcion had 440 yards after contact in 2025. Is it elite? No. Is it solid? Hell yeah. Even if I concede that he's not a home run threat, he not only returned two TDs to the house, but he also took a 48 yard screen pass to the house against a stout Mizzou defense. He also had a 45 yarder and a 34 yarder, both largely running after the catch. So you can take that however you want. Keenan Allen's career YAC average is basically half (and I'm being generous) of what Concepcion put up last year. Come on, man. They are entirely different receivers. Sure, he had some legit concentration drops, but it's like some analysts have said, a lot of times drops are overrated. Moreover, it's not like Concepcion is a finished product. I mean, it's easy to say most mocks have him outside the first round without realistically being able to look at all the mocks. I've seen him in the top 30 on big boards, so you take that as you will.
  2. Pavia is short with good size. He's strong and he's durable. He has good vision as a runner. He is a true dual threat, but won't be running away from anyone. Still, you can at least run a credible QB sneak, probably.
  3. Well, one thing about Pavia that is indisputable: he's got that dawg in him. His production can't be denied either.
  4. Dude, a lot if not most receivers don't break tackles. What are you talking about? Some of the most dynamic receivers in the game are elusive as hell and don't break a thing. We're not discussing a running back, we're discussing a receiver. The litmus test for a first round receiver are things like whether they are a legitimate playmaker, are a threat to take it to the house on any given play, can get yards in chunks, and can have a marked impact upon the game more Sundays than not. Concepcion runs good routes, and wins at all three levels of the field, not to mention is a legitimate returner. Only wins one way? Come on, man. That's ludicrous within the context that you're trying to imagine.
  5. Of course. Why would any receiver who has the ability not be elusive and avoid the tackle? You're trying to make it seem like he's some week receiver that gets touched by an arm and goes down and struggles to make contested catches, but that's simply not the case. Is he more elusive than strong? Of course. But the fact is that most receivers aren't going to have a bunch of highlights breaking tackles. Steve Smith is not the norm, but even Concepcion has a few highlights, including where he wouldn't go down and basically dragged a defender in the end zone.
  6. No mulligan for little time to develop? They barely got their feet up under them, but point taken.
  7. I see you read Reddit... Anyway, there are different numbers floating around, not that YPRR against zone or man is the litmus test of how well a player will do in the pros, but I'll give you that about zone. Just keep in mind that he was a different receiver at Texas A&M. There's a bunch to like about his game. For you to look at a metric and draw a conclusion or parallels is just selling him short. No analyst I've listened to has drawn that conclusion. This link is specifically geared to Carolina (the vid is on top). https://sports.yahoo.com/video/why-kc-concepcion-makes-sense-for-the-panthers-130000882.html Matt Harmon of reception perception is really high on the kid, and he's another one (along with Josh Norris) that says it wouldn't be a surprise if Concepcion turns out to be the top receiver in the class.
  8. So you too? Are you guys just not doing your research? If we draft in the first, it will have nothing to do with marketing the "local kid," and everything to do with his explosiveness and upside.
×
×
  • Create New...