Jump to content

Pejorative Miscreant

HUDDLER
  • Posts

    7,741
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Pejorative Miscreant

  1. It was a good read up to that point. They should’ve left that bit out.
  2. I do think this was really cool. My first reaction was they should give more media access to scouts but then pulled that thought back. If u have more people out there talking the higher the probability something slips that u didn’t want shared. But I do like the visibility with the guardrails and limitations. They definitely deserve the recognition.
  3. I think pretty much every “Bryce Hater” would gladly say the same thing. Sadly, I don’t believe this is attainable.
  4. The LLM needs to be trained and there is a lot of care and feeding that needs to take place. Garbage data in results in garbage information out. It can be a powerful tool if used properly but it should not be the sole decision maker.
  5. Viewing this as someone besides the equipment interns to throw the ball in OTAs. Not reading anything into this. Yet…
  6. While this report may be true and he may end up being the pick, I choose not to believe this. Just like a couple years back there was some guy saying the org told him he was the pick if he was still on the board…
  7. He fits in better with the falcons, bucs or saints.
  8. NO is a dark horse IMO. Not sure of how bad their roster is but I think that QB is cerebral and sound. Seems like the kind of guy that can elevate the play around him and figure out how to make the chicken salad. And I hate it.
  9. I am of the opinion that another first round pick of WR would be a huge disappointment to the team and fans because the bottleneck in the process is upstream.
  10. I think it’s a stretch but a lot of the rankings had Sanders going in the first last year despite predraft shenanigans. Not an apples to apples comparison but we don’t know where anyone is on the board. just my opinion
  11. I think your analysis is spot on. Someone posted a Greg Cossell interview on here a week or so ago and I liked his analysis on YAC essentially saying sometimes it’s receiver driven and other times QB (stated much more eloquently and extensively by Greg). If the team can’t execute plays that give the receiver that opportunity it’s irrelevant.
  12. You’re not gonna like my answer. Hell, I don’t like it either but it is what I suspect is happening. They’re trying to win with him cause they gave up so much to get him that they need to be absolutely sure he is not capable of taking the next step. That’s it. If he was a 3rd or 4th round pick the experiment would have been over long ago IMO.
  13. I’m not overly down on Canales but I think currently his record resembles a wedding reception accordion player more than a rock star. I think his ceiling is a bit higher so I am optimistic.
  14. Nay. It would be a wasted pick imo. I don’t see the talent there. Rather pick someone mid to late
  15. I like the idea of a trade down but not sure about trading out of the first altogether. Valid and logical points for both. I think it really depends on how the board falls but the idea shouldn’t be completely off the table.
  16. Agree with the sentiment and I’m not against it at all. The good news is you don’t have to draft an LT in the first which in my opinion is a much better position to be in.
  17. Ickey's not a sure thing to be back week 1 in 2027 IMO. I would love to be wrong about that but really doubt it.
×
×
  • Create New...