Pejorative Miscreant

You’re not gonna like my answer. Hell, I don’t like it either but it is what I suspect is happening. They’re trying to win with him cause they gave up so much to get him that they need to be absolutely sure he is not capable of taking the next step. That’s it. If he was a 3rd or 4th round pick the experiment would have been over long ago IMO.

I’m not overly down on Canales but I think currently his record resembles a wedding reception accordion player more than a rock star. I think his ceiling is a bit higher so I am optimistic.

Always seemed like a good guy with a cool name.

We parlayed a seventh rounder into a starting corner in 2024. Theres always hopium.

Nay. It would be a wasted pick imo. I don’t see the talent there. Rather pick someone mid to late

I like the idea of a trade down but not sure about trading out of the first altogether. Valid and logical points for both. I think it really depends on how the board falls but the idea shouldn’t be completely off the table.

Agree with the sentiment and I’m not against it at all. The good news is you don’t have to draft an LT in the first which in my opinion is a much better position to be in.

Ickey's not a sure thing to be back week 1 in 2027 IMO. I would love to be wrong about that but really doubt it.

I’m fine with letting this play out but if someone connected to the team mentions Byron Bell or starts talking about left handed defensive tackles I’m gonna have an all out panic attack. just sayin

Competition in a WR room with only 2 viable starters (imo). Maybe he makes the team better. Maybe hes not here in September. I dont know.

Not gonna be triggered by reports at this point. But Kenny Pickett?

I’m glad there are possibilities out there. Still wanna draft a guy but a quality vet would be a welcome addition.

Nothing against it other than meh feeling. If it’s best for the team it’s the rational and correct approach. No disputing that.

For me it would be like getting underwear at Christmas. Sure you probably need it and it will be extremely useful but there is no wow factor. Definitely not arguing with you. Just my .02

I understand the reasoning but I'd rather get a real tight end. And, I'd rather XL play the position he was drafted to play. Otherwise, replace him with someone who can.

I understand and agree with the sentiment. That said I think the definition of “BPA” differs from one person/team to the next. I know people say they draft BPA but have a feeling there is some rationalization to getting to that point. Personally I would have a formula based on raw assessment then look at other criteria such as team fit and roster impact (forecast number of expected game play, starts snaps etc…). Otherwise u could end up with 4RBs backs and 3 CBs.

My choosing between I don't think this would be a good idea to hell know but leaning heavily to the latter.

I don’t think he is on a hot seat right now but it could get warm very quickly. I think making the playoffs and having his QB pull out some key games allows many warts to be overlooked. At the moment. Once October rolls around I think anything could happen.

Glad u put this out there. Not at the Velcro shoe point just yet but a piece of me felt slighted by that joke although in all fairness it was funny.

To be comforted by this hire, his position title needs to be Dude who calls offensive plays instead of Dave Canales. If someone could confirm that is written on his office door I will sleep better.

Now do odds on firing a coach mid season.