Jump to content

Pejorative Miscreant

HUDDLER
  • Posts

    7,731
  • Joined

  • Last visited

1 Follower

About Pejorative Miscreant

Recent Profile Visitors

26,630 profile views

Pejorative Miscreant's Achievements

Grand Master

Grand Master (14/14)

  • Conversation Starter
  • Dedicated Rare
  • Very Popular Rare
  • Reacting Well Rare
  • First Post

Recent Badges

6.5k

Reputation

  1. NO is a dark horse IMO. Not sure of how bad their roster is but I think that QB is cerebral and sound. Seems like the kind of guy that can elevate the play around him and figure out how to make the chicken salad. And I hate it.
  2. I am of the opinion that another first round pick of WR would be a huge disappointment to the team and fans because the bottleneck in the process is upstream.
  3. I think it’s a stretch but a lot of the rankings had Sanders going in the first last year despite predraft shenanigans. Not an apples to apples comparison but we don’t know where anyone is on the board. just my opinion
  4. I think your analysis is spot on. Someone posted a Greg Cossell interview on here a week or so ago and I liked his analysis on YAC essentially saying sometimes it’s receiver driven and other times QB (stated much more eloquently and extensively by Greg). If the team can’t execute plays that give the receiver that opportunity it’s irrelevant.
  5. You’re not gonna like my answer. Hell, I don’t like it either but it is what I suspect is happening. They’re trying to win with him cause they gave up so much to get him that they need to be absolutely sure he is not capable of taking the next step. That’s it. If he was a 3rd or 4th round pick the experiment would have been over long ago IMO.
  6. I’m not overly down on Canales but I think currently his record resembles a wedding reception accordion player more than a rock star. I think his ceiling is a bit higher so I am optimistic.
  7. Nay. It would be a wasted pick imo. I don’t see the talent there. Rather pick someone mid to late
  8. I like the idea of a trade down but not sure about trading out of the first altogether. Valid and logical points for both. I think it really depends on how the board falls but the idea shouldn’t be completely off the table.
  9. Agree with the sentiment and I’m not against it at all. The good news is you don’t have to draft an LT in the first which in my opinion is a much better position to be in.
  10. Ickey's not a sure thing to be back week 1 in 2027 IMO. I would love to be wrong about that but really doubt it.
×
×
  • Create New...