Jump to content

Cpt slay a ho

HUDDLER
  • Posts

    8,045
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Cpt slay a ho

  1. Yay another former panther we can all hate on.....who's next guys?since this is a yearly thing........ No name bench player calling out a pro bowl de.......when he doesn't even know what happen 100%
  2. Hardy and the Panthers getting screwed over again.............Roger Goodell worst commissioner in sports
  3. unless there's some prime evidence,this is a bs suspension IMO
  4. We also drafted kug in the 4th the year before, he wasn't the bpa at that pick(IMO) but so many things to factor into that i wouldn't know the answer, but i'm sure when he drafted bene he was the bpa on our board otherwise we wouldn't have taken him. that's why bpa is a myth IMO and hard to break down when you don't know how high a team rates a player, my only gripe is the whole don't draft for need when considering bpa, but again it depends on the gm and their draft board. BPA is a good debate but in all honesty it's hard for anyone to pinpoint the concept
  5. this The above is usually what's considered a bpa draft, and much of what I think DG has stated
  6. true but why else would you trade up? IMO it's to get someone we /want not move up to take the bpa(which on our boards he could be the bpa). for example: if we trade up and get a Wr like White,instead of sitting at 25 and getting the bpa who could be gurley.By trading up,we address a position of need and we get our guy, instead of if we sat at 25 and got gurley,which isn't as big of a need as wr IMO but i can see why we wouldn't pass up on him.
  7. anytime a team trades up they're doing it to get a guy they really like, if we trade up i'd assume were doing the same hypothetically,if we trade up i don't think we would do it just to get the bpa but to get somebody DG likes and doesn't think will make it to pick 25 therefore,in this particular situation i don't think bpa would apply
  8. Let's not act like Boston and bene don't have another year to prove they're solid players, definite liked what I've seen from both but it's a different story once coaches have tape on them
  9. im not getting what you're trying to prove here,please explain
  10. We also could pick up a rb when that time comes instead of drafting gurley. Rb is the easiest plug and play position IMO, we barely could find a way to get both stew and d will involved enough I think that would be the same if we draft gurley.....there's not enough touches to go round unless a injury occurs.
  11. Mad no but it would be a questionable pick, we could pick up a rb to spell Stewart. We have bigger needs then a rb in the first it's a luxury pick IMO
  12. I hope this is last d will thread, the hate from some is oozing through my keyboard
  13. If true,this may bite us in the ass....especially if he signs in the division
  14. ok........then why are you quoting me?......if you don't like someones opinion learn how to deal with it without being petty
  15. going off what i've read in articles so far and so are you,it's speculation................still amazes me how some ppl believe their opinions are stone cold facts
  16. Smh someone dropped the ball big time, whether teammates or F.O. The recent image were portraying as a franchise is tarnishing year by year. I hope there's a legit reason players or coaches didn't send their condolences or pay respect
×
×
  • Create New...