MHS831

Looks like we are working the bottom of the roster for the UDFAs to a degree. Where are the DTs? No WRs (except a 7th rounder?) Graham--that is it (day 1./2)? I think drafting an OT on day 2 is smart.

thanks for this, bro.

Confirmed--no trade clause--not sure it he can waive it or not. Why would he? I would make them cut me, pay me, and then find a team after the draft if necessary.

Allen is 30 and had a down year--roughly identical to Robinson. With DT in this draft, I think teams are shedding their meh DTs in an attempt to save $$ and upgrade. I hear teams are LOVING the DT market. We have Brown and Robinson. I would probably draft a NT and DE. I have always liked Landry.

this is a no brainer move. He got better every game. He is better than Corbett--and he will only get better next year. Yes, playing between our guards, but Corbett did as well for a short while and Mays was playing better. He is a starting C. He is not weak. He needs depth and competition is not a bad thing--I might even try to lock him down--he is 25, great at pass blocking (meh in run blocking)

Seattle: Darnold?

Hmmm. Not sure this makes Raider fans happy. I do not know details. One year remaining on his contract. Good OL in Vegas. I still think they draft a qb--maybe in 2026. I think Seattle saves a lot of cap. UPDATE: I am warming up to this trade. Nice fit. Not sure what it will cost them.

This is not much better than what we already have and are trying to upgrade. Robinson turns 30 in 2 weeks:

Yep

I read on FB (trust it not) that we are one of two teams left going after him. Hoping it fails, if the numbers and costs we expect are true.

If djp14 is correct about Rich Eisen, I think Darnold would be better served to move on and get a longer deal since he has some good tape and is rather young. Not tagging him might suggest that Minnesota is not going to pay him elite money and/or they do not want to commit at all right now--Wilson staying in Pittsburgh? After his end of season slump, I think he is gone.

As a Panther fan, we want him to stay. It means more lust for the QBs picking before us. We need Sanders going top 5.

I will start. Please do not copy my ideas. Reminder: I SUCK at picking QBs, a tradition upheld since 2010. Aaron Rodgers___New York Giants__ Kirk Cousins*____will not be traded until after draft Sam Darnold __Minnesota Vikings (do not rule out a sign and trade) Justin Fields __Pittsburgh Steelers_ Russell Wilson Las Vegas Raiders So after these guys are signed in free agency, the following teams will need a QB entering the draft: Cleveland NY Giants (Signed Rodgers but might draft a QB too on day 2) NY Jets New Orleans Indianapolis Tennessee If my predictions are correct(?) two to three QBs could be available for trade. Cousins could go to Indy, following the exit path for discarded Falcons QBs. Tennessee will have to pick Ward and they should, which puts Cleveland in a unique situation. I think the Jets, Raiders (if they don't sign Russell), and Saints will go hard after Sanders, and they will offer Cleveland a lot. Cleveland could move back, grab a bunch of draft capital, draft the T they need, and then they could draft a QB later--it all depends on how much they like Sanders. The Saints have no cap room (-$44m), so a trade with Minnesota or Atlanta is out. Moving up to #2 from #10 is expensive in terms of draft capital. Suck it, Saints. They will have to stay with Carr. I think that the Jets will trade up with Cleveland to get Sanders and Cleveland will take a T and draft a QB later. Do not be surprised to see a player like Daniel Jones in Cleveland on a one-year deal if they trade back.

I thought it would be fun to see if we can predict the free Agent QB with the QB needy team who will sign them. This will help clear up the first round of the draft so we can mock unencumbered by the crazy QB carousel. So before Monday, it might be fun to see how well we can match the QB with the team they will play for in 2025. Understand that "retires" is an option and signing a QB like Rodgers does not mean the team will not draft a young QB, but we are not focused on the draft here. I admit, I have heard very little about these QBs and their expected destinations. I did not include players rumored to be dealt, like Geno Smith, but I did include Kirk Cousins due to his unique circumstances.* Teams Needing a QB Cleveland NY Giants NY Jets Tennessee New Orleans Indianapolis Pittsburgh Las Vegas Veteran Starting QBs who are available in Free Agency (trade for Cousins) Aaron Rodgers___________________ Kirk Cousins*____________________ Sam Darnold ____________________ Justin Fields ____________________ Russell Wilson __________________ Other: ______________ ______________** (optional) **Realizing that some of us are slow, we are NOT predicting draft picks. Free agents only. Feel free to add another free agent and where they might land IF you think they will be brought in to start--such as Daniel Jones, Matt Jones, Gardner Minshew, Jameis Winston. Interesting observation: As it stands, there are 8 teams identified as needing a QB. There are 5 free agents who are starting QBs and there are 3 QBs mentioned in the first round (Ward, Sanders, Dart). Everyone gets a QB!!! However, if Minnesota re-signs Darnold, someone does not get a chair when the music stops.

I see it. the run makes them step up, and there is no risk if we can't get behind them after forcing them into a false step. Very logical

In an unrelated note, it sure is quiet in Panther land.....perhaps too quiet. I guess this means a few things: 1 We are going to let Mike Jackson enter free agency. 2. Nobody seems to be getting extended or re-signed for now. 3. They need to know how far apart they are with Horn before free agency, imo.

Yeah, it is not just the weapon, it is the manipulation of the coverage to cover that weapon-fewer blitzes, rolled S--If you see that your #1 is in man coverage based on the S, for example, you go to the #1. If he gets S help, someone else should be open. We all know that. Considering our needs and considering Free Agency and the Draft, we might have to work XLs butt off and see if he can step up. Not ideal, but the pressure will either make or break him.

I prefer Mason Taylor if he is there in the third.

I see your side clearly. I think they will go after Milton Williams asap. He has a 90 PFF pass rush rating but a 43 run defense rating, fwiw.

Absolutely. We have a starting CB and 2 starting Safeties to fill-- In addition to a NT, 5-tech, Edge, and probably LB. On the offensive side of the ball, TE, WR, RT, and C.

These guys would probably cost much less:

Not-So-Bold Statement: We will sign at least 1 Free Agent Safety, possibly two.

PAUSE: We are about to enter the most exciting weeks of the Panthers' season. Try to keep your minds open and hear what Huddlers have to say. Even us dumb ones.

He who must not be named (to avoid a Huddle meltdown) is rising.

That is my first impulse, Aussie, but I think we horribly overspent last year during the tampering period. I just think there is a crazy bidding war with the new cap money and once teams blow their wad, there are some really good players left. We can get 5 players instead of 3. I see both sides, however. You can look at it from this perspective: You don't have to trade for these players, so the only thing you lose is money. Later, if you have a need, you have to trade for that player...