MHS831

77.4% completions. 42 TDs vs. 4 Interceptions. 349 yards per game passing yards. 11.2 yards per attempt. What more are you looking for? Oh-and a national title. None of the QBs across the bottom of your list came very close to these numbers.

Good debate--why I love the next 7 weeks. But don't assume Jones sucks because his numbers will dispute your opinion. He wins and he produces.

I am not sold on Jones, but I am not sold on any of them. Most qbs will tell you, success is dependent upon how quickly you can process--if you have the tools. And people criticize me about comparing Jones to Brady for the purpose of demonstrating the success of a non-mobile QB. I think it is not a fair comparison because Jones is better. Why do I say that? Compare Jones' senior year of college to Brady's senior year of college. They want to compare Jones in college to the Brady we know now. That is not fair to Jones.

All qbs have weaknesses. Can you answer my questions? If he has this much concern, how did he have so much success? I provided the numbers. Can you explain it?

So are all of these your opinions or do you have specific sources? How can you do what you describe and complete 77.4% of your passes for an average of 350 yards per game? 42 TDs and 4 Ints. It does not add up. If he has all those problems, how did he do that?

Jones cannot run, but he can move in the pocket. His arm strength is average. He processes faster than most other QBs. He is accurate. So if anyone can explain it to me why Jones is not going to be a good QB in the NFL, tell me what it is you see. Remember, Brady just won a ring and he has more rings than all the Super Bowl champs with mobile QBs combined. So tell me what it is about Jones that makes him such a bad option? Be specific, and use stats if you can. And do not say "The league is now all about mobile QBs." The Tampa Bay Bucs and the Alabama Crimson Tide won titles THIS YEAR. Again, be specific and use stats to support your answer.

This is being "objective"? Have you Googled that word yet?

Issues.

Actually, your post is probably going to get you banned--but first, some suggestions: Don't call someone a moron for disagreeing with you and in that same post demonstrate the grammar and writing mechanics of an eleven-year-old exchange student from Romania. This (?) is called a question mark. It comes at the end of an interrogative sentence. "At" is a preposition and ending a sentence with one tends to suggest that the writer of that sentence lacks formal education. "Running Backs" is 2 words, not a compound word. And everything you say is an opinion that totally disregards statistics related to the NFL historical data. So you probably are in no position to question anyone's intelligence, which explains the underlying rage behind your post. So please, go back to school and learn how to write, but before that, please accept some constructive feedback: https://www.betterhelp.com/helpme/?utm_source=AdWords&utm_medium=Search_PPC_c&utm_term=counselling+service_p&utm_content=27452374690&network=g&placement=&target=&matchtype=p&utm_campaign=384672130&ad_type=text&adposition=&gclid=EAIaIQobChMIn_nY5I6n7wIV2vrICh27aw7iEAMYASAAEgJ9jfD_BwE&not_found=1&gor=helpme

There are some diamonds in the rough there---let's see what we can do.

I have had my eye on him--wondered why he is not on that round 2 menu-this explains it.

I think Jones could be a good pro. Still, risky. Mond in the second may be the best value in the draft--- Sign Trubiski, trade back, draft Mond and add picks. Let Mond sit for a year, run some scout team, and use the picks to build the OL for Mitch--see if he can improve in a pocket with good WRs---if he does, lock him up, keep Mond and when he has a good preseason, trade him for a first rounder and a few other picks. Who knows?--this year is such a crap shoot.

He is talking about hookers though.

If Person said it, then, by God, what are we waiting for! Kidding. I hate that prick something fierce.

CMC healed. If you say he did not in 2019, I will giggle and then block you.

And that can mean that we are going to have some coins in our pockets on Black Friday.

Yes--he got himself into a jam and this was his "get out of jail" move---this year, 25% of our salaries were in dead cap money. We won 5 games. Amazing.

Very wise-

Sensitive subject. Most of us would double our salaries if we get the $15 minimum wage guarantee.

That is what makes this "slip" of the tongue rather meaningful. Why else would it matter? I watched the video and Rhule was very careful in selecting his words about Bridgewater. I mean, it is all circumstantial and subjective, but that is what makes this time of year fun.

Wait a tic--when you change the contract, it changes the prognosis. I think, "on his current deal" is a given when you discuss all players. This is one less hole to fill. He is a good player, just an overpaid player.

Folks, shopping in free agency on day one is not a good practice. Traditionally, teams rarely make a good investment. Rhule and Co. are good developing players--give em room. https://www.fieldgulls.com/2019/3/18/18270197/free-agency-is-bad Take a look at the article above (written in 2019) by the Seahawks. It supports the article I posted on the Huddle a few years ago that used data to show that about 70-75% of expensive free agents do not earn their contracts (when compared to positional performance of peers). Let's use the 2016 group of free agents as an example, since 2020 would have been the end of the fourth year: "Highest paid players to switch teams in free agency, in “total” value: Malik Jackson, Olivier Vernon, Josh Norman, Brock Osweiler, Janoris Jenkins, Kelechi Osemele, Russell Okung, Damon Harrison, Kelvin Beachum, Alex Mack, Marvin Jones, Brandon Brooks, Bruce Irvin, Sean Smith, Coby Fleener, Tashaun Gipson, Rodney McLeod, Mitchell Schwartz, Mohamed Sanu, J.R. Sweezy. Of those 20 players, 13 are no longer with the teams that signed them just three years later (2019). Those 20 players had 17 contracts that were at least five years in length (Jackson was the only one who got six and he was cut after three), and most of those were ended prematurely without the expected return at time of signing. Of the three four-year deals, Irvin made it the longest at 2.5 seasons. The only player of those 20 to win a Super Bowl has been Brooks, a remarkably good signing for the team and for him as a free agent choosing a good situation to walk into."

Like underwear, so why bother changing. Whose with me?

Key words: POSITIONAL FLEXIBILITY We have several players on the team and in the draft with this--not sure about free agency--will have to look. RB/WR (had that in Samuel) LB/S/nickel: Chinn CB/S/RB: Hartsfield OT/OG: Daley DT/DE: Obada (free agent) 3T/NT: Brown We need a hybrid TE/WR (Just working from the top of my head--I think we do value dual position aptitude --made that term up, but positional flexibility is also effective)

I appreciate this, as I am sure others do.