MHS831

They are not that bad--a delicacy in South Central Monroe, actually.

This is exactly what I thought--however, during the draft, someone said his return was slated for July 1. That is too soon. imo, unless the complete tear is a faster process than a partial. Maybe I did not understand what was being said. I personally think they should IR him for four games and then take about 2 weeks to activate him--roughly midseason? Right now, (and I think Sanders will be OK with the new OL--if he stays) we have a loaded RB room. Penny, Blackshear, Sanders, and Hubbard without Brooks. We can bring him along slowly.

Every once in a while----remembering Fred Lane.

We also signed the Monmouth RG to try out, I think. They were making some holes---I never saw the RB get touched in this video---hard to say--but if we can sign one undrafted free agent to the roster and maybe four to the PS--that is a pretty good haul.

We signed an undrafted free agent from Monmouth (going from memory) who might make the PS--a sleeper, they say. I watched his highlight tape--he had a solid OL and has good vision--huge holes and seemed to score on 2 offensive plays.

Do they have a system in place (Scheduling) where only a team with 9 home games hosts a game in another country? It would be remarkably unfair for a team to have to host a home game in Europe, for example, if they do not have but 8 home games and 9 visiting games. I am also interested to see if any team that plays in another country has a Thursday night game afterward. Guess I could Google it.

They bombed Pearl Harbor. Never forget.

Legette has the most upside of any WR in this draft. That does not mean he is better, but the room between where he is and where he could become is wider than anyone else--very close to Mitchell.

I think the first three were obvious---then it was a pretty safe pick sending Odunze to Chicago--the Jordan Morgan and Graham Barton picks were laughably lucky

having the worst record in football has advantages over being mediocre.

Good point--waiting does not serve his best interests.

Yep--shoulda called them the Gary Indiana Sweat Shop

If all 5 of our CBs had the last name "Jackson" wonder what we could call all 5 Jacksons? OK--my meds are kicking in--I am back.

This is ironic--and undoctored, authentic photograph.

Read the first line of my post---then read your response. A few points---I acknowledge that I have not seen the players on the field yet, something you seem to point out in order to attack my opinion--that is what I call going full Richard Cranium. I state that he did not get bullied (trade values don't need performance criteria--they make trades without knowing the player's nfl game performance in the draft--should not have to explain that to you. There are still good deals and bad deals). He did not get bullied like the trade up last year. He got us a second rounder back. How is that like Fitterer last year? I'll wait for you to answer, but I do not think you will--effectively using things called "facts"

Because it is my mind--I don't need your approval to change it. Do you always poo a post before seeking clarification? I could have explained it, but your intent was not to learn.

Dammit. Would someone put her on a leash? We are a David Tepper onion ring away from having this as our owner.

I might target former 2017 first rounder Adoree' Jackson (We like CBs named Jackson) who is 28. He had a down year in 2023, but before that, he has been solid most of the time-- Steven Nelson (31) Houston had 4 picks last year and has been pretty solid. I am not sure I would target one CB and wait for an answer--we need them in here for OTAs. (Some of these veterans, like Favre at the end of his career, will hold out or not sign until after camp--that is good for the veteran player, but for team chemistry and mentoring, it is not ideal.)

Already noticing differences At least this year, we did not see photos of Xavier hugging Mrs. Tepper (even if others were hugged, it simply suggests owner involvement on a premature level, imo)--there were no cute news conferences wherein the head coach jokes about drafting a RB because he had a good game against Baylor and his wife told him to; There are not recordings of the head coach calling a long snapper and trying to convince him that he is being drafted and not pranked. In other words, I get the feeling that the GM was actually able to do his job this year--we shall see.

Obviously he has limitations. but Coker was running a lot of deep routes. I do not see that as his role here, but we will see if they can get him to fit in. It seems (based on what I saw reported about his contract-if accurate) that they want him here for some reason. Deep routes take away his advantage as a WR...he is a route runner, so we will probably see him running slants and outs quite a bit--wherever they play him

Working for a season under Adam Thielen (another undrafted WR) should be a positive factor. Some of these issues are correctable. Many kids from small schools not only lack experience against DI schools, they lack the coaching that develops talent.

7.5 sacks. Lightning fast. Hmmmm. Nickname: The Jet. Can play many positions on the defensive front-probably best as a pass rusher. Interesting...

Good question--good athlete, good hands. Everyone knew he was getting the ball and his qb was not good. Good routes, high character. The only answer I can come up with--small school--but we had a first round CB from Toledo. He can even get off against press coverage. Hands are great. Even catches contested balls (see Buffalo game). His only criticism is that they do not see elite vertical speed and there is a "lack of suddenness" . Some feel his YACs will be limited. Beyond that, I have no idea.

The way I understand it, they had to shorten it because his "Hut!" had 3 syllables.