MHS831

bryce to put the team on his back and march into NFL glory....(faint music getting louder--patriotic music)

that Rico celebration could be like taking off the helmet in Atlanta

wallace is hurting us---ironic--he is hurt

I don't think Bryce has 100 yards yet. His RB does.

what the heck? Canales' play calling is suspect. On the road in Green Bay, and lets milk a 1-score lead by riding Rico.

I hate these throwback uniforms--we get it--you are old--but we play the team--the logo and the colors--not people wearing fake easter baskets on their heads.

the BBDB defense *Bend but don't break

I would not be surprised to see a draw or screen here

you see it too? And I am disappointed in Ransom, but I would start him

in fairness to Bryce, shouldn't the NFL let him play with a regulation sized Youth league football?

this has to be the plan-there needs t be competition

I think a pass rusher would be hard to get--so I have not mentioned it. i also think that our two young OLBs are showing some signs. It is tough to figure out. Is it scheme? Are we predictable? However, I don't see us upgrading by adding a Reddick (sheer luck) by next week.

I see that,but my focus is broader, which changes the logic (unless I am missing something here). If you like Rico and trade Hubbard, you don't have to let Rico go--you could sign him, have Etienne and Brooks and maybe even a late round draft pick--but you get an ILB, which is our biggest weakness--which is my point. If you isolate your focus on RB only and you focus on next year, it makes little sense to trade Hubbard--to me, you upgrade LB right now and you have RBs. I think we are constantly in rebuild or build mode, we don't think like those seeking rings. What helps us more--(and I am not sure about Hubbard's trade value, which was part of your point)--a backup RB (solid but still a backup right now) or a starting ILB? Which player fills our needs? So I could argue your point, but there are other perspectives that should be considered if you broaden the scope. It is not a no-brainer--lotta variables.

A good GM is always looking to upgrade the roster--a fire sale? No. But if there is a LB there who can tackle and cover.... I would argue that the WR room looks solid and is not expensive right now. The OL is probably not an area to tinker with. RB? I am a believer in the premise that you do not give RBs lucrative second contracts in most cases--so if we can trade a Hubbard to get a decent LB---I say, YUP. We ride the Rico hot hand, Etienne is a good reserve, and Brooks MIGHT be able to play in 2026. Smart move to lose a little and gain a lot.

damn. I thought my idea was original)

I was not engaged at that time, and I looked up and saw the close up. He did seem out of place, and I wondered why he did not get out of the way-- Great point--was it a direct snap and Chuba missed the call...?

My concerns? XL still doesn't understand the concept of a sideline and he has yet to break out in year 3...I think it was (according to the announcer) Corbett at center who hit Chuba in the arm with the snap--I was away, but not sure why he was at C. Our LB play was terrible. Buffalo messed with them all day--they seemed confused. Not sure what our DL was doing. And safeties missed a ton of tackles that led to big plays. I did not watch that closely, but it seems Coker should be the #2.

I agree with you--but I was not implying that he threw the game--he is bad enough to play and not have to compromise his integrity.

Interception to a guy five feet away, fumble on a key drive, drive killing and TD screwing passes, taking a sack when rookies know to get rid of the ball---Giving away plays at the LOS-- Andy Dalton alone has cost the Panthers at least 14 points and has give Buffalo 6.

Yeah, Dalton, that extra yard was worth the risk.

they were going to go for it on fourth down--hence the run

2nd and 5 is better than 2nd and 8. Just my thoughts.

But what about the over/under? (Kidding--but this is telling)