MHS831

Ice him and get a field camera in his face--a rookie

STOOOOOOOPID Says all you needto know about Canales' confidence in Bryce...we could have sealed the deal

take what they give you, idiot.

waiting until the clock ticks to 3 seconds after a timeout is stupid--cost us a to

Play action here, run next

dont settle for the 48 yarder, Canales

Play action pass after faking to Rico--hit the underneath routes.

Canales is riding Rico too much--they are going to stack the box and force Bryce to beat them--and if they throw it to XL--odds of a turnover about 20%--hit your TEs, Coker, and TMac. Nice celebration Rico. We are not in it without you, but we are not losing without you. Be smart.

I posted a few weeks ago that my father, a Gamecock who caught 37 passes the year I was born--he knows football, told me the sign of a good QB is this--if you were behind and you had the ball on your 20,2 minutes left, and 2 time outs, would you feel that the game is yours? He called that the measure of an NFL QB--because you need a gamer--an Alpha.

bryce to put the team on his back and march into NFL glory....(faint music getting louder--patriotic music)

that Rico celebration could be like taking off the helmet in Atlanta

wallace is hurting us---ironic--he is hurt

I don't think Bryce has 100 yards yet. His RB does.

what the heck? Canales' play calling is suspect. On the road in Green Bay, and lets milk a 1-score lead by riding Rico.

I hate these throwback uniforms--we get it--you are old--but we play the team--the logo and the colors--not people wearing fake easter baskets on their heads.

the BBDB defense *Bend but don't break

I would not be surprised to see a draw or screen here

you see it too? And I am disappointed in Ransom, but I would start him

in fairness to Bryce, shouldn't the NFL let him play with a regulation sized Youth league football?

this has to be the plan-there needs t be competition

I think a pass rusher would be hard to get--so I have not mentioned it. i also think that our two young OLBs are showing some signs. It is tough to figure out. Is it scheme? Are we predictable? However, I don't see us upgrading by adding a Reddick (sheer luck) by next week.

I see that,but my focus is broader, which changes the logic (unless I am missing something here). If you like Rico and trade Hubbard, you don't have to let Rico go--you could sign him, have Etienne and Brooks and maybe even a late round draft pick--but you get an ILB, which is our biggest weakness--which is my point. If you isolate your focus on RB only and you focus on next year, it makes little sense to trade Hubbard--to me, you upgrade LB right now and you have RBs. I think we are constantly in rebuild or build mode, we don't think like those seeking rings. What helps us more--(and I am not sure about Hubbard's trade value, which was part of your point)--a backup RB (solid but still a backup right now) or a starting ILB? Which player fills our needs? So I could argue your point, but there are other perspectives that should be considered if you broaden the scope. It is not a no-brainer--lotta variables.

A good GM is always looking to upgrade the roster--a fire sale? No. But if there is a LB there who can tackle and cover.... I would argue that the WR room looks solid and is not expensive right now. The OL is probably not an area to tinker with. RB? I am a believer in the premise that you do not give RBs lucrative second contracts in most cases--so if we can trade a Hubbard to get a decent LB---I say, YUP. We ride the Rico hot hand, Etienne is a good reserve, and Brooks MIGHT be able to play in 2026. Smart move to lose a little and gain a lot.

damn. I thought my idea was original)