MHS831

I forgot all about that. Standing corrected.

This just in: I am liking the moves. There seems to be some urgency right now (or is that me hoping there is urgency). I sense a move coming on.

I feel exactly the same way--Corn raised his stock and if I were him, I would at least shop myself.

He never saw the field--I was hoping he was developmental and would be decent, but you are right--we need a CB to play the #1 WR.

Good post. I am with you. I think Elder is a free agent, but he was good last year.

S: Chinn, Franklin, Burris, Robinson, Hartsfield (played some S last season, I think ti could be pretty decent as is, very good with a stud) CB: Pride, Jackson, Thomas Oliver III, Elder (re-sign?) That is not great, but could be decent. I think it was a lazy signing.

He flashed---I hope there is something there. Chinn, Franklin, and maybe a rookie S could make the 3-3-5 scary--if they step up. I have no idea what they are thinking, but I was impressed with Franklin--then he disappeared for a bit.

Safety, in the 3-3-5 just became more important without a lot of fanfare about it. I see Chinn moving back there permanently-leading the defense--more like a rover, for lack of proper terminology---

Talked to him at OTAs--I was with a friend of his from UNC--he is a very nice person--a great guy--positive attitude. I pulled for him, but when you are a S, you have to make the tackle--not guessing and diving...

Special teamer, prolly, but he has the skill set and size they seem to covet.

I wonder if they like Hartsfield. The answer, in this case, could be on the roster. (Chinn, Hartsfield, Franklin, and (should I say it? Nope, I can't. It would be wrong. I'd get blasted...) Kenny Robinson? Is there a there there?

Nice. If he did, I am pretty sure he did not knock anything over.

I wonder if this move is not the beginning of playing Chinn more if not solely at S. It might suggest that Chinn will not be a bargaining chip in the Watson deal.

Tell me if this sounds logical: In all probability, we are staying with TB unless we trade away multiple first rounders and maybe a player or two. I do not see sitting at #8 a plan to bring in a QB. This is one of those years, when QBs are on the move--like musical chairs--and if you are not aggressive, you are standing alone when the music stops.

That kinda bothered me too. Not sure it was meant literally--but who knows? We know they went after Stafford hard, no signs we went after Wentz (unless I missed a memo). No rumblings about the possibility of Minshew, etc.I really do not know what that meant.

This free agency period--with the reduced cap and elite names wanting fair market value--should leave quite a few talented players lying around on week 2. I think we could find a few OL that way--maybe a DT--maybe even a LB.

I am in your head!!!! Grab Redyed Dew Tit. If I had a nickel....

Eerie!! That settles it. Teddy Bridgewater it is.

Lotta chatter for a player not on the market. There is a chance they attempt to reconcile, but the JJ departure was huge because it reflects a coup of sorts, and once a general defects, you do not pull him back and put him back in charge. They had best get rid of him. I would ask all players if they want out, and make a list of unhappy campers--trade them if I could, cut them if I couldn't. You can't paint rotten wood.

Prescott is the only player that might fit that description, but he is not as good as Watkins, imo. I think Dak is overrated, frankly. Has had a good OL, WRs, and RB in Dallas. Still can't win.

Way to dig Person. Good journalism.

All I know is this: If you rearrange the letters in Teddy Bridgewater it spells "Lombardi Trophy" You have to change some of the letters and throw a few away, but it works.

Why the 3-year (2 yrs. guaranteed) deal?

I wear a Panther helmet and shoulder pads under a jersey to work. with Dockers.

I agree, but he seems to have the locker room-we see it--do they?