Jon Snow

Not if he keeps McAdoo. That would worry me tremendously.

I'm not. What the tram does now is anyone's guess.

Except against us of course. Love ya Wilksie but you know the game.

I think he will do better than that here. For once I think that we finally have a coach that will break the non back to back winning season curse.

It's only temporary. Anyone brought in will only start until one of the rookies are ready.

If the worst we could do is 9 wins a season brother I will take that anytime. Add 2 or 3 wins to that and you are in the playoffs every season. With nine wins every season you are always in contention.

Don't forget the qb coach. I'm very interested in seeing who that will be as well.

I would say he is an option. I'm sure the FO is open to it but will Sam be?

Yes! If he somehow reads this I tip my hat to you sir for reminding this team and this franchise what winning feels like once again.

That may depending on who's available that will be willing to compete for the starting spot. They will most certainly add another rookie to the room and Fitterer will not play that 2 vet competition bs again because Tepper will not allow it. This is about to get interesting.

Good question. I really don't know what type of qb he would draft as I'm not sure he ever got the chance to draft his own.

No, you're not. I really feel bad for him because I thought he did enough to warrant another shot here. But its not my money and not my team. I understand the decision they made based on what Tepper said after the Rhule firing. He wanted an experiened head coach with an offensive background. He got the right man that fits that description.

If you are looking for rational in the comments brother you are sadly mistaken.

Why would he telegraph his intentions to the other 31 teams in the league? I hope he's smarter than that. He should just give vague answers like BB and look at everyone in the room like he's going kill them in their sleep.

I see what you did there.

I'm really curious to what kind of defense they will run with our current personnel.

If I recall I was indifferent to it much like I am with this one and others in the past. It is what it is.

I think that is mainly speculation based on the series of events that has played out. I doubt anyone really knows beyond the interview committee and the candidate or candidates.

Civil Engineering. Highways, bridges, utilities, infrastructure projects and a host of other things related to the field. Does that fit your criteria for an engineer? I really don't care to be honest.

It can be. But if you are able to get them to listen to you that's half the battle. The other half is getting them to pay you on time.

As a fellow tenured engineer yes, all of the above. There is a point at which you get tired of teaching some else how to do their job. There's a point where you tell yourself that these young, know-it-all, wet behind the ears, fresh out of college, twits are going to have to learn the hard way just like you did. Luckily for me my staff has already gone through their growing pains and are running on autopilot. My stress is now solely from clients.

No worries. I was clarifying for those that didn't have a clue what we were talking about.