Right. I don't disagree with what you are saying, but let's just use Bam Martin-Scott as the example.
He ideally is looking for a LB needy team where he can possibly latch on to longer term. We check that box. So if we check that box AND are giving double what the next team is why wouldn't he come here? This is where we can blow the competition out of the water, say someone like Cincinnati. They have a very cheap owner, because he doesn't have a lot of spending cash, who can't "throw away" this type of money on UDFAs.
Everything comes down to a risk/reward analysis. For us, the risk for these high guarantees is the lost money, which Tepper can throw around a lot more than most owners.
We should consistently be getting the pick of the litter, at areas of need, for UDFAs because everyone wins. We get the players we want at camp and they get a bit of security with larger guarantees.