JawnyBlaze

That’s what I’m thinking. They are #2 and 3 in the draft. They can get Wilson if you’re the Jets or whichever they like better between Lance or Fields if the Dolphins seriously want to move on from Tua. And the Dolphins at least could get serious draft capital by trading Tua, surely a 2nd at least. Seems like it would be a better return on draft pick investment. Only way I see either of those teams getting in the Watson sweepstakes is if they’re completely underwhelmed by the #2-4 QB prospects, because if they’re relatively confident in one of them it would seem to be a better gamble to just draft that guy.

“Some people took it as disrespectful”. Entirely insincere but whatever. That was the most important day in that kid’s life, but for Cam...it was Tuesday.

Honestly, that trade wouldn’t be too bad. Only two firsts, and it solves the “too much money in WRs to resign Curtis” conundrum. We’d be left without a star RB, but we could resign Samuel this year and DJ next year. Still a very good WR pair. Draft a 3rd or 4th rd RB (or not and let Bonnefon have a shot at the backup gig), keep Davis as a stopgap starting RB.

As long as it’s not Bridgewater and there’s a clear plan. I can’t take another season of Bridgewater.

“QB coach at performance lab California” lol. Obviously thinks he knows a lot more than he does.

“In his mvp season he had funchess, Benjamin and olsen. A bunch of receivers with big wingspans who could bail him out”. This random nobody loses all credibility there. A) he didn’t have Benjamin that year. B) cam had never been regularly bailed out by a receiver in his career. This rando obviously has no clue. He was also highlighting plays where cam intentionally led the guy low, a common tactic to give defenders no play on the ball.

Naaaaah. Maybe two, and that’s a stretch. They’re asking almost the same thing Houston is for Watson, and Watson is a better QB who is also younger.

Not saying his shoulder was 100%, but it wasn’t “done”.

I actually did. And he still threw it better than Bridgewater. With far worse players around him.

I’m pretty sure Cam was referring to the same thing that ended up getting Smitty cut. The locker room was Cam’s, Rhule and Tepper didn’t want the locker room to be Cam’s. So Cam got cut. Not his shoulder, which turned out to be fine, not this mythical demand for a new contract that has never been hinted at or anything by anyone that would actually know. Just locker room politics. Cam is fine with it, I’ll be fine with it as soon as we get an acceptable replacement. But as it stands right now, it was still a mistake. Cam right now and last season was far better than Bridgewater with a more manageable contract.

Lance didn’t make reads in college either. Very rarely.

I’ve said the same thing since I starting researching QBs around week 8 of the season. Trey Lance too. I’m sure it’s 100% because of their systems, but that doesn’t change the fact that we haven’t seen them do it yet. They’re both bigger risks. Wouldn’t be mad if we took either though, assuming Wilson is already gone.

Absolutely not. Restructuring means more commitment, which is the last thing we need for either player.

Now if we’re talking Zach Wilson...for two firsts it becomes a tougher decision.

Only if he’d be significantly cheaper. Like a single 1st. Watson is better and younger. Has a lot longer left as a high end player.

Pretty pleased so far. Not perfect but definitely making strides that we never would have seen under Richardson. We’d still have Rivera and Hurney if not for Jeans Day.

No pocket is always clean, and most QBs will have decent stat line when cherry picking plays when they had a clean pocket. Of course having the best oline possible is ideal and helps out QBs, no one would ever argue otherwise. But we could have the ‘93 Cowboys’ oline and with Teddy back there we aren’t going anywhere.

You misspelled seven.

That doesn’t make any sense. You’re implying we like Fields as a prospect more than Watson as a proven commodity? Even if that were true, driving up the price for Watson doesn’t benefit us in any way. In your scenario the Jets trade for Watson, the Texans then take Wilson, and it’s the same outcome as if the Jets just took Wilson in the first place. There is zero benefit to us

Truth. All the graphic in the OP shows is that Teddy can ONLY function under perfect conditions.

If the jets trade for Watson, then the pick they give the Texans will still be used on a QB, even if Darnold is part of the package probably...

YGM wasn’t one of the three choices. If he could take the place of Chinn, then I’d probably go with YGM

Yea man, annoys me when people tried to claim he “didn’t live up to his draft position”. He more than exceeded it, just what he does isn’t as obvious for the casual fan to see. Even without being second for rookie QB pressures he would have at least met expectations. Being only second to the guy that undeservedly won droy in QB pressures for a non-UT DT is icing on the cake and far exceeds expectations.

If I gotta choose one of the three it’s Chinn. Love the guy and so glad we finally have a good Safety, but the front four is just way too important.