LinvilleGorge

Maybe. Similar situation to us. Young potential but very little proven production.

And it's why they have no receiving corps. Paying QBs big money makes you make hard choices. Paying an absolutely TRASH tier RT big money further limits your options. LOL

You can spend big on the OL when you have a QB and the majority of your receiving corps on a rookie contracts.

I completely get it from the player's perspective. But just because it's good for the players doesn't mean it's not absurdly ridiculous.

The entire team only had 20 receiving TDs with their team leader only having 5. Man, their offense was ass that year.

This is getting beyond stupid.

What the hell happened to Kyle Pitts? He looked like he was going to be one of if not the best TE of his generation when he put up over 1k yards as a rookie. Instead that looks likely to be the high water mark of his career.

Did you really just source your own Twitter account? LOL

I hope not. I was a big fan of Bradberry but he's cooked. He was never the twitchiest, fastest guy and he's lost a couple steps he couldn't afford to lose.

For future reference, the good stuff ain't "white". If it's white it's cut to death. You're looking for pearly, almost shimmery looking chunks not powder. I used to be a wild motherfuger when I was young. LOL

Pink cocaine. AKA "Tusi". Not even cocaine at all. Usually a mix of MDMA (molly), ketamine (special K), and a banned ED drug.

One of the safeties would honestly make the most sense. Ramsey is the big splash name but a plug and play decent starting safety is a bigger need than a 30 year old mega money CB. Especially after we just made Horn the highest paid DB on the league.

Seems massive reach to tie that clip to a move on Ramsey, but I mean this is a SpecialJuan thread so everyone already knows it's massive reaches and overstatements only.

Wellllllllll... https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/stefon-diggs-yacht-video-a-bad-look-for-patriots-biggest-offseason-gamble/

Agreed. I don't think most teams tank. The one team that I think DEFINITELY tanked was the Colts on their "suck for Luck" campaign.

This. Generally speaking, if you can avoid back surgery try to avoid it. I know several people who have had to have back surgeries with the results ranging from disastrous to good, but no one has raved about it. None are back to their old selves.

Fine with me. Get the rookie and Sanders more snaps. Tremble is basically a bottom of the roster type of player. For some reasons the Panthers just absolutely love paying those types of guys at TE.

Yeah, it's going to be interesting to see where this ultimately goes. They're trying hard to kill the golden goose. With the playoffs expanding to 12 teams and purely going with the highest seeded teams you know the SEC is going to throw a bitch for every time they don't make up at least half the teams on the field. Some of those crazy ass homers honestly think it should just be all SEC every year. No one else belongs. It's mainly the fans of lower tier SEC schools who think this way. It's just their attempt to rise the coattails of the better teams and act like they belong instead of realizing that they're just schedule cannon fodder.

We would have had to have had a perfect off-season to come anywhere close to that 2015 team. And honestly, that 2015 team was basically an elite defense and an MVP QB going full Superman to carry an overall subpar offensive roster.

Well, I mean pretty much nowhere to go but up defensively.

Maybe. On the other side of 30 everything gets dicey. Some guys hold up a long time but most guys show up one day and they got old overnight.

No. This team doesn't need to be trading valuable assets for 30 year old stopgaps.

Yeah, he's closer to contract decision time.

Yep. Fans want to compete for championships while front office personnel and coaches want to keep their jobs. Paying a JAG starting QB negatively impacts your potential upside to compete for championships but rolling the dice to let him walk to shoot for championships might backfire and cost you your job. This is the big reason why NFL teams are generally so risk adverse. The safe path is the path that will most likely keep you in your job the longest but it also might be limiting your upside to potentially compete for championships.

No one is "hating" on Purdy. The point is that in his situation a lot of guys could've duplicated his production and now he's going to have a contract that is going to force some difficult roster building challenges with the cap impacts. The massive advantage with Brock Purdy was his dirt cheap rookie contract that allowed a lot of spending flexibility elsewhere on the roster and that advantage is going away.