Jump to content

LinvilleGorge

Moderators
  • Posts

    90,796
  • Joined

  • Last visited

3 Followers

About LinvilleGorge

  • Birthday 07/12/1982

Recent Profile Visitors

97,040 profile views

LinvilleGorge's Achievements

Grand Master

Grand Master (14/14)

  • Dedicated Rare
  • Conversation Starter
  • Reacting Well Rare
  • First Post
  • Collaborator Rare

Recent Badges

109.8k

Reputation

  1. Gotta be a failed physical, right? Nothing else makes sense.
  2. A Twitter account with 116 followers quoting a Twitter account with 800 followers is not a "source".
  3. Yeah, there are several posters who don't think TE is a need at all because Canales doesn't use them. I mean, given our TE roster of course our TE usage in the passing game is going to be limited. We have a roster full of third stringers.
  4. Makes sense. Seems like an old school Steelers power RB.
  5. All for it. Dude looks like a difference maker even if it's just on special teams.
  6. But I was told by the Huddle that Canales is the modern day Mike Martz and treats TEs as an undersized third OT?
  7. At #19? No. There are no first round center prospects in this draft. There rarely are and we definitely don't need a developmental OG in the 1st who will almost certainly be a backup barring injury for at least a year or two.
  8. And Robertson from Baylor is basically another Pickett.
  9. I'm concerned that the primary one we've been tied to is another noodle arm. It really feels like we're trying to avoid bringing in someone who can make throws that Bryce can't and that is just absolutely bizarre.
  10. Sure. Sign or draft a backup QB in the mid to late rounds with actual NFL caliber physical tools that might be able to push Bryce. We've signed another QB who doesn't have an NFL arm and the mid to late round rookie we've been tied to is another guy whose main concern is NFL arm strength.
  11. We're definitely making moves as if we are.
  12. A career backup coming off of a major injury, I can't imagine his value is much if anything over vet min. For vet min or not much more I'd be all for bringing him back. He knows the system, he's familiar with his OL teammates, and he's well acclimated to being that versatile OL backup. We shouldn't be counting on him to return to form but I'd be all for giving him that opportunity at a value contract.
×
×
  • Create New...