Jump to content

strato

HUDDLER
  • Posts

    10,030
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by strato

  1. I sub too, I just couldn’t find it. I saw rankings, the whole download the Beast thing, but no 3 round mock. Google didn’t help.
  2. I mean, someone has to show me we actually can make proper use of a deep ball threat. I have an image burned in my head of a fast dude breaking free with two steps on a guy, and having to wait on the ball. This guy ran a 4.52 so maybe that wouldn’t be an issue for him but I don’t think that is what we need. One thing I agree on with most of the WR in the 1st crew on here is we need a slot type. A compliment to what we already have, not more of what already have. We need a quick twitch matchup problem that can operate inside 20 yards.
  3. I would trade back but not for a rostered player. Give me some ammo to move up for ILB in the second. Still should be able to get a good player at 22 or even a little lower. Need about 100 points to go up 10 spots in the 2nd. 19 being 875, 22 is 780 which almost does it. 95 points. You can probably get to 41 with a swap of 5th round picks added in, ours are worth 27.8 and 28.2. LAC has no 5th round pick. That I saw.
  4. No telling. But a segment would for sure be calling Young the guy because…. two in a row! Big time throws. Best deep ball thrower. All he needs is another weapon and you’ll see!
  5. We still have the draft but what I am seeing from the other NFCS teams tells me that 7-10 could win it this year.
  6. You might let someone else pay you to take him and level your value out with the proceeds. Which is what I would want to do if a WR that is clearly the best player at 19, is there.
  7. Well all we are doing here is pissing to mark territory because non of us have a bit of power over what they will do. At the same time a lot people out think the professionals. I have a way I want it to go. Probably won’t, usually doesn’t. But will say again, we have a crisis brewing on OL.
  8. Well certain guys are clearly a notch better than other guys. But only very occasionally will they present themselves to you all wrapped up with a bow when your clock starts. I am a win at the LOS fan over skill positions and if a LT or an A’Shawn replacement stood at least even with other players I would be a buyer. I think there was a good argument for T Mac in that regard last year, and had no issue and would accept it again this year but it needs to be really clear. I don’t expect it to be. But if it is, there should be trade interest and that’s what I am about this year re our situation. I would love to trade back and fit the value to an OT while getting ammo to move up and get one of these LBs in the 2nd. Need based? Yep. Trying to build a team not a room.
  9. I looked at 2027 FA QBs with that in mind just this morning. It isn’t pretty. Starters are Watson, Geno, Stafford and another guy so meh I forgot who it was. Justin Fields, mildly interesting if he learns anything from Andy Reid. Davis Mills isn’t bad. Then I got to guys like Levis who I think is interesting but not someone you bring in as your guy.
  10. So if a tackle that likely won’t start in 2026 is BPA, you are good?
  11. The only way I think a G makes sense there is if he converts to C.
  12. Not doing it for me. Next. Guess I’ll go look at it and get the full context on who we passed on to take these future HOFs.
  13. We for sure need to get a couple of rookie contracts on that OL. Looking 2 years out, 80% or more could be new compared to 2025. I think Hunt and Moton are prime targets for planned obsolescence. Icky, can’t be counted on and C is already going to be different. As far as receivers, Coker should be enough to demonstrate that every one of them does not need to come from the 1st round.
  14. We have talked ourselves blue in the face about the problem with it for three years now.
  15. I agree. Especially with an offensive HC and OC with their roots in WRs. Coker alone shows you that you don’t need to shop in the high end boutique section.
  16. We are in agreement on OT. It is a real need. And yeah even without a straight camp competition, I just think attrition would put him in play at some point. I hate to be so negative about Icky coming back right, but the history of that injury makes a bad outcome the most likely result.
  17. I’ll believe it when I see it, as far as Tepper parting with Bryce. And I don’t how he could seriously think yet a third staff can unlock this QB.
  18. The point was supposed to be he was developed for LT even at 8 overall. I guess I didn’t make it clearly.
  19. It seemed like a sentence, from day one. Punishment for something we did or didn’t do. I begged for parole, an appeal, got nothing. Years now. It’s like, we’ll find out this year. But, we are in the movie Groundhog Day. They have loaded up the offense and now given him his full time OC and given that OC a tutor. What is left to enhance? Aside from a receiving corps full of first rounders, that we may yet end up with. If he doesn’t do it this year, the offense will labeled as young and green and that will be the excuse.
  20. Yeah we have to grade the field position on a curve.
  21. That is reasonable, the development aspect and I hope to heaven they do that if they don’t want to invest early. Gross went at 8 I think, and was RT his rookie year.
  22. Okay. I haven’t really looked at him because, no interest in tiny. I would ask the same questions I asked about Bryce, which are basically what athletic traits does he have that rate as above average in the NFL? In Bryce’s case, the honest answer I came up with was none.
  23. It would have sucked then too. We had all these specimens in and I think maybe they have their heads on straight looking at the future, just maybe. Then this poo. Did Morgan lose a bet?
×
×
  • Create New...