PantherBoy95

Well I asked for an explanation and didn't get one, you mind explaining that logic? Is it about salary/ saving cap?

I'm guessing you won't want to explain it again, but please do in short at the very least. Hypothetically The worst thing he did was place himself in the position. However if there is one thing I've learned in all my years dealing with women... Other than that the only true incident I recall him having is the obvious motorcycle situation. Anything else is reaching for a reason. If he's proven guilty fine literally Release the Krakken it is understood. If found innocent however, how can you punish a guy for something he did not do? *Or were you saying that it has to do with salary/he wouldn't have been here even if the case never happened.....in which case I typed all of the above for nothing smh

SIDE NOTE: WE GOT REP BACK!?! I'M IN HERE

JUUUSSSSTTT as I was reaching for the pie button I read the last 6 words.

Calm down ladies. God forbid this is the first time I've ever brought it up. Also you're probably taking it the wrong way, I was stating that what Cam did is nothing in comparison to whatever this kid allegedly did. I don't know much about the laptop story, nor do I care to understand. At the end of the day what Cam did was a dumb college kid making a dumb college kid mistake. Cam's "scrutiny" was all media driven/not actual crimes is my point.

Ehhh... Cam stole a laptop.

That is hilarious, and sadly likely true.

Of course, now the Ealy pick looks great.