KillerKat

Im fully expecting Young to get extended and us being in QB purgatory hell for another 3-4 years after it. Its the panther way. Young is the pick that will keep on giving. When its all said and done, we will have about decade full of below average QB play ,assuming he stays healthy enough, for a guy we mortgaged everything for to select #1 overall.

They can walk and chew gum at the same time.

That hat probably costs more than what that mascot will make in his lifetime.

Not gonna win it with Young either.

The 1 year we had Gross and Otah. Gross and Wharton werent bad either.

Thats basically what I said, I just added more specifics. In the end, the stat is just one of those stats for people that cant make judgments based on what is in front of them.

And it will continue to be debated. Its so dumb.

Yes

As a team stat, I would be fine with.

Ive never liked the term game winning drives because they include games where the QB was part of or was the reason the team was behind in the first place. Ive been arguing against this stat since the Delhomme years. It should only count when the QB is out of the equation of reasons why the team fell behind in the first place and is at least half the reason why he led the last drive to give them a lead. It shouldnt count if they just hand it off most of the time and the RB is on fire and they go down and score a TD or FG.

now if only the rest of the schedule was against bottom of the league defenses.

pray the other teams defense plays like one of the worst in the league.

This is why you dont pay RBs. Just keep drafting them and picking them up on deals in FA or low cost trade.

Op should just eat the poo they are getting and move on. Its pretty embarrassing for them.

Drew Brees of pee wee football.