CamWhoaaCam

We just don't want good players because we have to pay them. If it was up to some of you we would just keep the players we draft for 4 years and trade them when it's time for them to get paid. I

Thanks for using my proposal I made the other day. It was Burns for Higgins/future 1st. I doubt they can afford to pay Burns after the Bosa deal. So this is just a pipedream trade as well.

Luckily we are in the NFC. I doubt the Bengals trade him to any of the top teams in the AFC. Unfortunately we traded our future picks for Young so I doubt we could get a deal done anyway. Our only hope is via FA which they probably will trade him before then.

Im honestly hoping we just be competitive.

The 1st game of the season vs a non contender will tell us were we stand? Im thinking by week 4 we know for sure where we stand as a team. Never judge a team off 1 game.

Im confident a deal will get done for that very reason. They turned down 2 1st round picks. The intention was always to sign him to a longterm deal. Honestly wouldn't be shocked if the deal is done later today or tomorrow. Burns seems like he's ready to play so a deal must not be that far apart.

touché

Screen to Robinson problem solved. Need another gameplan coach Smithers!

I already have it made up in my mind Chark will play 4 games max this year. Starting the season off with a hamstring injury sucks, those things can linger for months.

TMJ and Mingo it's time to show us why you had half the huddle calling you both potential star WR's.

Never judge a book by its cover. Read the book let it play out. Judging it before you read it could backfire especially if it was a good book.

I mean Bryce Young didn't come free... I said I wish he traded Burns instead of Moore in that scenario. He got Mingo in the 2nd so lets not judge him until we see what we have in Mingo.

I know deep down you and I can be the best of friends. Maybe someday you will realize it. Until then we can be the best of enemies.

I said from the beginning I was never a fan of the Rams trade. I think the real missed opportunity was trading Moore instead of Burns. I think Moore made more sense to keep in that scenario given we were trading for our young franchise QB. Instead of having to rely on other young WR's we would have Moore/Thielen two reliable targets for a young QB. That Burns trade made more sense then trading him for 2 more rookies. That's just me though, I can respect others opinion if they disagree.

Fitt is not in this along. Teppers signs off on these deals. Also Tepper went hard after Deshaun Watson. Lets not place all the blame on Fitt.

I don't think the Rams deal was the right deal. I think the deal with Chicago should have been Burns instead of Moore. That's the deal Fitt missed. Bryce has his #1 WR from day 1. Maybe instead of picking Mingo in the 2nd round we draft a pass rusher. Offense seems more formidable with Moore/Sanders/Thielen as your skill players. Now that's how you make your young rookie QB more comfortable give him proven talent around him he can trust from day 1.

Burns is still on the roster. I will be a fan until he is traded. You can continue to talk about why we should trade him for picks. Im focused on Sunday and watching Burns get his first 3 sack game of his career. Go Panthers!

Who we signing with that cap? The FA class for WR's was suspect. Also are those weapons trying to come to a rebuilding team and a rookie QB? You have these assumptions, but it's not that easy. You have to have vet players on your roster to attract other good players. FA's are not looking to join rebuilding rosters with no identity. Im more upset that we traded Moore over Burns. If we drafting a rookie QB it would have made more sense to keep the vet WR in his prime. Im open to trading Burns but it has to be the right deal.

The same offense we outscored with Sam Darnold at QB? The same offense that missed the playoffs in the NFC? Yeah im shaking in my boots from the scary Detroit Lions offense!

When Burns signs his new deal we can celebrate together. We have a homegrown star DE. I think we should keep him. We traded enough star talent already. Now you got people on tv saying they can't name a player on our roster because we traded them all. You need stars on your roster.

Unproven picks are not a guarantee. One of them will be used on a edge rusher to replace Burns. So where are the weapons for Bryce coming from?

Yeah offense was just good enough to beat the Chiefs with bad WRs and no Kelce. High Octane alright! If Kelce plays this game is a blowout. But keep hyping the Lions. The same Lions we beat with Sam Darnold at QB with the playoffs on the line.

Just because we are not a contender doesn't mean we should trade all of our elite players. If this was a full rebuild Burns would be on the Rams right now. Burns was obviously in our long term plans if we turned down 2 1st. Contract will get done. I don't care too much what it is as long as it's reasonable.

I enjoyed it actually. Was just angry the Lions were out on that stage. NFL wants them to be good which is why a non playoff team played in the season opener.

Lions won their SB for this year good for them. Oh well Panthers 1 game back from the #1 seed in the NFC! See you boyz Sunday!