Jump to content

CamWhoaaCam

HUDDLER
  • Posts

    12,045
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by CamWhoaaCam

  1. Speak for yourself. I would have done the same thing. Did you not learn from Dak Prescott? Yeah he got paid, but it took a year off of his career and he hasn't been the same player since that injury. Tua concussions... This is a dangerous game. Im protecting the bag in that situation.
  2. Im repeating facts my man. I can't help that's his resume. Injuries happen. It's also been reported he could have played this past season but he sat out to protect his bag. So in reality we judging this guy off 6 games of being injured. Is 6 games enough to call a player injury prone? Guy hasn't even missed a full season yet of games. He's not injury prone. Once again a running QB gets compared to Cam Newton because he gets injured. They trying to do the same thing to Josh Allen. Cam career was done when Watt landed on his shoulder. Not because of hits. It was a freak injury. Now Cam Newton has become the poster boy for running QB's not having long careers.
  3. Some people said he could have played at the end of the season but he sat out to protect his bag. I can see that being true. If true that 10 games is more like 6 games. Is 6 games enough for us to call a guy injury prone?
  4. Lamar talent can't be questioned. Look at all my post defending him. It's always about his "contract". Nobody is questioning his talent. Bring that dude to the NFC and watch him make a team a contender overnight. He's already proven even in the AFC with those elite QB's he can still win games with a lesser roster than Mahomes/Burrow/Allen. Last time we had a guy like that it was Cam Newton. Greg Olsen and not much else.
  5. I do because they seem to be right. We have gone downhill since we last actually had a franchise QB. If Tepper likes losing then keep signing the Darnold's/Mayfield's/Bridgewater's of the league and see how that works out for us. I know im annoying some people because im defending Lamar "the player". You can question his contract cool. But you can't question his talent as a QB. He's a true franchise QB that can't be debated.
  6. Never said he's the GOAT. All I said is he's a winning franchise QB. As a starter he's won 75% of his games. And compared to the QB's we have in the past he's clearly a step up in talent. Sorry you don't like him. But I will debate anybody on him as a QB. Only a handful of QB's in this league are better than Lamar. That's the type of QB we are dealing with.
  7. That's all im saying. What does it say about us that we go after QB's like Darnold/Carr/Watson/Mayfield/Bridgewater then think we are too good for a former MVP who all he does is win 75% of his games. Then we wonder why the media is calling us a losers on Nat'l tv for not offering Lamar a contract. Maybe because we make dumb decisions like we have the past 3 years.
  8. My man you reading random articles about a single person thoughts on a situation? Im talking about the media the people that are actually seen by millions of people. Nobody is saying race is the issue. Im watching and they are all saying it is about collusion. You're giving me random articles from some fan blogger.smh
  9. THIS! People need to stop using Watson as an excuse to not offer him a contract. We don't have to offer him that contract. Just offer him what we think he's worth. If Baltimore matches so be it. At least we tried to get a franchise QB at a fair price.
  10. Collusion my friend. Everybody sees it. Players see it. Turn on your tv that's what there saying.
  11. And Derek Carr was? Watson was? Darnold was? Bridgewater was? Those QB's are losers. Lamar is a winning QB.
  12. And that's my point. Why don't they want a QB who wins 75% of his games and has a MVP on his resume? They telling us they are not trying to win. This new staff said there would be change. If we don't want Lamar fine. We better get a QB in the draft.
  13. Then let them match it.lol It's not hard. Just offer him a contract at least show the fans we are trying to find a winning QB. How the hell do you go after the weirdo Watson but not even go after Lamar. It makes no sense.
  14. Why can't a team just offer him a contract that they feel he is worth? I don't know if you know this but "we don't have to offer him the Watson contract." Offer him the Kyler Murray deal if the Ravens don't match we just got a franchise QB for a steal. Daniel Jones is making 40+ mil a year. QB's are going to be high priced regardless of how good or not good they are. I will say it again we don't have to offer Lamar the Watson contract.
  15. Who's saying anything about race? I have been watching the different media shows this morning and I haven't seen anyone bring up race. They all saying it is about collusion from the owners.
  16. They have been killing us and Atlanta this morning about not offering Lamar a contract. Basically called us losers because we aren't trying to sign a QB who wins. Even if you don't like Lamar, why are we not even offering a contract? We don't have to offer him the Watson contract. Offer him the Kyler Murray contract. I just don't understand how Tepper went all out for Watson but he's not even interested in Lamar who has a better resume.
  17. It wasn't about race. They basically was saying a guy of Lamar's caliber having no teams offer him a contract is kind of puzzling. It's collusion without a doubt. Has nothing to do with race.
  18. There should be a 30 for 30 on that situation. Im still shocked the Browns gave him a fully guaranteed contract after the issues he had off the field. Just will never make sense.
  19. Some team who gets left without a QB in the draft will likely offer him a deal which will likely not be the Watson contract offer. This is why im not ruling us out down the line. If Atlanta gets their QB that will put pressure on us to either trade up or go after Lamar after the draft.
  20. I called collusion as soon as all the teams started dropping those tweets about not being interested. Then you see the players tweeting about it. This is the owners saying "The Watson contract is not the new standard". Add in Lamar is represented by his mom. No way the owners are going to easily pay Lamar that contract. He will likely be a Raven unless some team doesn't get a QB in the draft which likely might be us especially if we don't trade up for a QB.
×
×
  • Create New...