Jump to content

Bear Hands

Moderators
  • Posts

    4,494
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Bear Hands

  1. 7 hours ago, CarolinaLivin said:

    Honestly the board fell kind of in our favor in this scenario of TMAC being the pick. Some good talent that was expected to go Round 1, fell. Have to navigate this the right way though. 

    Yeah the run on OL & a QB2 going allowed for some strong defensive talent to slip.  Now, there's some QBs, RBs, TEs, & WRs that are very much in play at the top of this round. 

    CLE go QB, WR, RB, TE

    NE could go WR, OL, TE

    HOU needs OL help badly

    Titans could use protection for Ward - or WR/TE

    Raiders & Bears could go OL (although they do have some D needs)

     

     

     

     

    A fringe 1st on D could be there in the 40s.  

    • Pie 1
  2. Yep - others mentioned it but just slapping on one of our 4ths gets us at best to the mid/late 40s.  

    Add just one of our (3) 5ths, that's early 40s for 57+114+140, we keep our high 3rd in tact.  

    --

    An interesting one is CLE with pick 36.   They've already got 33, 67, and also have a later 3rd at 99.  

    36+99 is 665 on charts

    our 57+74+114+140 is near equal value.  So that's reducing our overall picks down to 7, but still, nice.    

    So could move wayy up in the 2nd, back in the third, and you're giving up one of our 4ths, one of our 5ths. 

    Just floating ideas 

    • Pie 5
  3. 1 minute ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

    Yea I think I feel the same way.

    It’s probably the safest pick they could have made.  TMac projects as at least a decent NFL WR.  His total bust factor is lower than Walker.

    Yeah Walker is the type that could just not make an impact. Chaissson esque. 

    Mykel didn’t have the burst

    Pearce has a screw loose.

    Green may have a dick loose.

    Graham may have edged out Tmac if there but it seemed our board was 1-Carter 2-Graham 3-Tmac (over the other front-7 guys)

    Ezeiruaku or Swinson would be excellent value that are at a similar level to these 1st rounders, with honestly less limitations and similar upside. The other offensive skill guys don’t really touch Hunter or Tmac.

    • Pie 4
  4. 1 minute ago, ForJimmy said:

    TMac is just a case of prospect fatigue.  Watching some of his highlights I'm surprised he played as well as he did with that QB play...

    Yeah there’s the guys that legit fall due to character/injury (Pearce, WJ) but then ones where it’s pure fatigue of discussion — think it happened with McMillan and Graham a bit this year.

    • Pie 2
  5. 2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

    Not a bad plan. Of the elite QBs, Bryce probably most closely fits the Brees mold. 

    Also, our HC made his bread and butter with WRs, so let’s see what he thinks he got himself with one worth 8 overall. 

    I think people are getting lost at Canales’ potential input - the presser seemed to show he had a very good grasp on what Tmac was bringing and the type of infrastructure he wants here. 

    • Pie 1
    • Beer 1
  6. 1 minute ago, ForJimmy said:

    Based on what??  ESPN has him ranked a 91.  That only below Harrison, Nabers, and Odunze putting him at WR4.  Brugler said he might be WR3 in last year's class as @Bear Handsjust stated.  Stop being so dramatic...

    Not to mention, how they’re ranked as prospects is never clean with the output. Marv Jr was this undeniable prospect but now people are really questioning if he’s a #1 with Nabers and BTJ looking like the absolute truth for their squads.

    Also a lesson- never shy from the LSU receivers — minus that one we drafted lol

    • Pie 3
×
×
  • Create New...