Jump to content

csx

HUDDLER
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    17,269

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by csx

  1. csx
    He's been said to be below both of those. That won't be a surprise
  2. csx
    I'm interested in how the NTs and 3/4 DEs handle registration and orientation. These are vital to predicting success
  3. csx
    Surprise! Players are tall, fat, short, strong, fast, and agile.
  4. csx
    If we can get him at 9 I say go for it. Why not? Put this staff to work. They should be up to the task of sculpting him in to a pro. I'd rather do that than trade too far up.
  5. csx
    Exactly. "we want a good one who runs the offense and distributes the ball" is what everyone wants
  6. csx
    That's a pretty generic analogy. That's like saying the point guard is like the QB of the team. Of course
  7. csx
    Is there something in the cheese that turns their QBs in to head cases it n GB? That's just not happening.
  8. csx
    You perfectly as summed up what Carr is not coming and should not come here.
  9. csx
    Wouldn't surprise me if this mention was just done to drum up trade hype for him. Given we make a lot of trades and have been in the spotlight for hires recently
  10. csx
    I would guess the opposite. Very small percentage have long illustrious careers. Most all will have lasting physical issues
  11. csx
    In the topic of the thread?
  12. csx
    The guys that founded the company are PhDs in cognitive neuroscience and neuropsychology
  13. csx
    He's not getting signed here so it's all academic
  14. csx
    There's little to no chance the ownership or coaching staff is going to repeat the pattern that doomed bott the past 3 years
  15. csx
    He's a sure fire mediocre QB. Not what you want
  16. csx
    Teams wanted to trade for Stafford. There was a competition for him. Similar story doesn't mean they are on the same level. I don't think any team thinks so or he would have been acquired already
  17. csx
    I thought I typed not on level. I certainly meant to
  18. csx
    Carr is on on the level Stafford was. I think everyone knows or should know that.
  19. csx
    Of course he would be behind Rodgers. He has 2 winning seasons in 9.
  20. csx
    I guess you missed my point. If he speaks badly it's not because of where he's from.
  21. csx
    No to giving up assets for running backs. Would love to keep Forman at the right price. If so not sure we need to mess with the position at all unless someone interests them later in the draft.
  22. csx
    They typically speak better English than those who do so as a first language.
  23. csx
    Exactly. He had low production games scattered throughout the season among 3 different QBs
  24. csx
    Unless they suck as bad as Zach Wilson. But then again free agents respond to money above all else.
  25. csx
    Glad they didn't trade for Stafford. Plenty of valid criticisms but that was a good thing to be concerned about. They weren't winning too much more with Stafford anyway. Reluctance to go all out for him or Watson were not losing out.....0 for 2....or whatever people said. It was being prudent.
×
×
  • Create New...