classics

We'll be fine. PJ will be running A LOT! Should be an ugly low scoring W for us.

I read the title and my first thought was "someone looking for someone to blame" but after seeing the video, yeah I'm pissed and agree he was probably solely responsible for it. I don't know how he can look his teammates in the eyes after they see it.

Personally I wouldn't want him as he hasn't shown anything worth getting excited about.

I just read a post stating that Henderson has only played about 20% of the defensive snaps. I know its early and he may yet develop into a good corner yet but looking at Arnold's play in Jacksonville, I can't help but think they made a mistake with the trade. Especially given how Darnold had already lost CM. Here are the two player's stats compared over the two games since the trade: Henderson: 6 tackles - that's it. Arnold: targeted 11 times, caught 7 (63% catch rate) for 94 yards. More importantly, 5 of those catches went for first downs. And for what it's worth, here are Anderson and Trembles' numbers during that same two game stretch: 34 targets, caught 14 ( 41% catch rate) for 128 yards with a total of 5 first downs. So basically Arnold is getting a 1st down almost half the time a pass is thrown his way while Anderson and Tremble get one every 10th pass. And if those numbers aren't bad enough, check out the article below: Again, it's early and hopefully Henderson works out but right now, I would love to have Arnold back. https://www.si.com/nfl/jaguars/news/dan-arnold-on-his-immediate-impact-influence-on-trevor-lawrence-and-that-play

I don't understand why anyone would pull one play out just to make him look bad. If you want to look at a particular play, look at the last one where he sealed the edge allowing Mc to pickup the first down. Without that block, there's no way he gets it.

Dang I didn't know you were at his negotiations. What else can you tell us?

That was great. Thanks!

Pretty sure at this time of the year, just about every question is just going to a rehashed post/question as there's really nothing new to talk about. As far as click bait to his site, I personally don't have a problem with it but then I'm not on this site that much so wouldn't find it annoying. And finally, if you don't like the question/content, then just hit the back button and you can go back to looking for that original question.

Thank God you didn't say Hellmanns...you get pie just for that!

let's hope not LOL

I'm no homer I can assure you. I like how the FO was aggressive in addressing all the needs but like you state, the odds of everyone working out are very remote. That doesn't mean that we won't be a much improved team though and I do like our chances against them much better today than last year.

It means exactly that; it isn't always a good thing. I didn't never I said not always - there is a difference. Yeah they were good last year and, no doubt, will be again but I seriously doubt they were so good no changes were needed. There was a book that came out years ago call 'if it aint broke break it". Basically it preached to always challenge the status quo if you want to get better. So again, I don't believe continuity is always good.

I think Tremble is the perfect TE this year given the questions concerning the OL. I can't help but wonder if they drafted him solely for his blocking. If he eventually develops into a catching TE, that would just be the icing on the cake.

Continuity is not always a good thing. Age WILL eventually get to Brady and everyone will be gunning for them this year. Needless to say they will still be good but I like our chances better after the FA signings and draft.