Diehardpanth02
HUDDLER-
Posts
290 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Huddle Wiki
Forums
Gallery
Everything posted by Diehardpanth02
-
Appreciate the help Tayzor All jokes aside how the heck do you edit posts now. Is there no way to do so, I swear my phone goes retarded Everytime I try and type daviyon lol.
-
Thanks bud. Struggling with he name. At least I got Nixon right. He looks to be a monster in the making.
-
Lmao if I could delete the post I would. I am struggling this morning lmao. I believe it is Daviyon and I've completely butchered his name and the post. Either in watching his film he looks nasty. So either way, with my inability to type his name this morning I'm still excited about the pick.
-
It's braviyon. In which I clearly notated in the original post, and comment after referring to the mistake. I also stated go watch the film. He looks promising, and a very intelligent player. He has the intangibles. But poo it. I really don't give af. Since the sight updates I can't seem to edit. Oh well. Poo away, if it makes you feel better.
-
This dude is a monster. Seriously athletic with the brains to go along with it. The more I research our draft picks the more excited I get. It's an odd feeling as panthers fan, because usually, as we all know with Marty Hurney, after round 2 there is a very high likelihood that it's just another pick. Someone who never really pans out. But now we got a GM that can find gold in the later rounds. I encourage you all to go watch film on this guy over on the youtube. Excited diehard fan right here. I love the type of played our FO is eyeballing. It's going to be huge in terms of depth, and finding value in the mid rounds which is something unheard of in charlotte! Would post a link, but you all have thumbs too. Anywho, Braviyon is my pick for steal of the draft. What about you guys? Who is your diamond in the rough based on current knowledge.
- 48 replies
-
- 11
-
I don't even think he has to be Kittle 2.0 that's a big ask out of any player. George is a freak. But if he even comes up half of that or better, we have a trademark player. It's the value he adds to the scheme for me. His nastiness and willingness to decapitate people in the run game, and mostly any blocking situation is huge when you have guys Like CMC, DJ and Terrance Marshall toting the rock behind them.
-
You guys are sleeping on Tommy Tremble. That man is a monster. His hands are adequate, but the way we use our TE is similar to the 49ers is Their FB, Jucyszk. He going to giving Mccaffrey all kind of running room, opening up lanes on the edge in the run game. Not only that but as a stalk blocker for our WRs who could house it at any moment. This gives our athletes on the edges the much needed protection we've been waiting for. He's not a Pro-Bowl Tackle, or a Travis Kelce WR. But he's one of those players who does the dirty work, and loves to do it. And does it Nasty. He's Grimey. And that's exactly the type of player we need at that position even if he Nevers grows outside of a high level blocker. He may not be great in all aspects, but he's the type of Roll player that makes guys like CMC hall of famers.
- 69 replies
-
- 21
-
How y'all gonna feel whenever we drop 60 million in the last 3 years on Teddy Bridgewater and Sam Darnold?
-
I can agree with this statement. Except for the fact that the comparisons your using is off. We're in a position now with a young QB with experience to draft a contingency plan, who could sit for a while to determine if Sam is going to make it. If he doesn't then we're fine with Fields. If he does, then we have a surplus and trade bait. It sets us up nicely to not be forced into a long term contract with Sam if he doesn't pan out. I'm just of the mindset that there is a reason why the guys listed above have been perennial contenders. Brady, Rodgers and many guys like that always provide wins with a sub par cast. We need that under center. When we find that then we continue the build. If they feel like he's THAT GUY. If not, then draft BPA get your tackle or CB. I just think completely disocounting having that talent stashed behind darnold is a bad idea. Bc we just don't know if Darnold will turn it around here. And if we were to trade that pick to NE, and fields comes out and meets the expectation. That'll sting a whole lot more. But I can see your side of things as well.
-
Probably because at that time the other option was Jimmy pickles. It's no execuse. The circumstances are different. We're bringing in a guy with potential, but no proven track record. To be honest, we should have considered drafting a QB as soon as Cams shoulder was destroyed as a contingency. We could've done so with plenty of guys. But our FO decided to wait or draft a LATE round flyer. Tom Brady and Drew Bledsoe Aaron Rodgers and Brett Fabre Steve Young and Joe Montana. I could list examples all day with teams taking this approach. And they've been far more successful than the Teams that took the Trent Dilter route. And let's keep in mind all the guys you point too are from a different era when defenses weren't hamstrung by the rule book. Shoring up the QB position in this day and age of the NFL is by far the single most important piece off the franchise. To remain perennial contenders anyway. Sure we could draft a tackle and I'd be ecstatic, but then the Darnold could darnold and we're back at square one. But go ahead. Go off.
-
I just don't understand why so many people are on the ropes with the idea of drafting a QB at 8. Competition breeds competitiveness. I want Darnold to fear for his Job. And I want a young hungry capaby rookie pushing him for his job. And let the best man win. Fields falling to us just seems like a blessing if it happens. As bad as I want a cornerstone tackle, it won't matter if we don't have a competent guy under center. Most of the teams with history of the most success at the QB position don't care how or when they get their guy. But when he's there and they can build competition for preseason they jump on the opportunity.
-
So we really buying into darnold huh? 9 wins in a 17 game season will make me vomit. It's 10 minimum for me. Then next man up. We should not accept mediocrity.
-
Competition at QB. If fields or lance is there take them. OL. But as much of a luxury as it is, a TE can block for you and be a threat in the passing Game. So Lance/Fields, and Pitts If neither QB is there. Then use the remaining draft for OL. Possibly a CB.
-
This x47. F a game manager. I want a producer lol. Teddy threw the exact amount of picks as Sam last year. How you keep a job as a game manager that won't be a star, but won't throw picks. And then proceed to throw picks? This doesn't even talk about fumbles. Teddy Two gloves hands ain't strong enough. I miss the days we had a QB that would dunk on people in the end zone too. Sigh
-
Darnold part of the draft day strategy
Diehardpanth02 replied to JawnyBlaze's topic in Carolina Panthers
It's really kind of simple. Find a QB you can ride with while you groom your franchise. If a QB falls that they like you can bet they draft him. -
You know honestly, Ive never seen this board happy about any moves we've ever made. Yall hated the Cam pick. Y'all said CMC couldn't run up the middle. Y'all whined about Luke being drafted early. Y'all was hype about Kelvin Benjamin and Devin Funchess. Thank the Lord none of y'all are GMS. Y'all would've gave houston the keys, and your bootyholes for deshaun watson only for him to molest 18 personal trainers and massage therapist. Let it play out. It could be worse. We could be lining fuggin teddy bridgewater under center again. At least they recognize when a qb sucks, and if darnold sucks he will meet the same fate. Besides at least the guys hands are bigger than my kindergartner and he doesn't need two gloves to handle the ball and get it down field 5 yards.
-
Bucky Brooks won't be sucked into Mac's meteoric rise
Diehardpanth02 replied to top dawg's topic in Carolina Panthers
You can get head from both sides of the sword or something like that. Double edged. Sword. Sorry -
Bucky Brooks won't be sucked into Mac's meteoric rise
Diehardpanth02 replied to top dawg's topic in Carolina Panthers
It's because coaches like Shanahan believe in their own system so much that they just need a guy to do as their told. They prefer a QB to run the "system" than a qb who can improvise. Thats the double headed sword of the QB position. Take a guy who can make every play on a whim. Or Take a guy who will make the play that's expected, no more or no less. I as my own arm chair GM will lean towards the athletes any day of the week. But guys like Drew Brees and Tom Brady counter that argument pretty strongly. Neither of which were star athletes in terms of underwear sports.