Diehardpanth02

Funny to me that they recognized that Seattle wins a Super Bowl with elite defense while stating that offense is a more consistent indicator. But historically defense wins championships. It is known though that offense gets you there. kind of contradictory but not really a suprise coming from them. The best writers there always pick the offense because that’s what casual fans tune in to see. They don’t want to see a low scoring defensive battle.

Almost like they are in two different stages of development. Like they need to win now with Stafford while he’s there. Who knows how long they have.

We had Toms number idgaf what anyone says.

Ah there is always more pie to be maid

I feel like we can win this one. Our run defense will have to be better to do it. Hopefully the changes they made there pay big dividends in this one

Dinners on Dan tonight

There were a lot of moments that went like that for us in that one. The cotchery no catch absolutely demolished a promising drive that felt like was leading to points. The sack fumble with Cam came right after that play.

Some of the catches they flashed impressed me.

Maybe he’s a shooter?

Not a flashy pick. But looks like a durn good run defender. We did the same thing back with star and Short. I could see the same effect. Keeps our linebackers free. another smart but not fan friendly pick. I like it

That’s why you draft. Your just more likely to get a better OT early and more likely a safety/DB later that can play. but I get it could go either way. That’s the point I think you just go who you think can make more difference.

This may be the only time I’ve ever felt that picking Nick Scott to play a position was a plus move. lol But that’s more on that Forsythe guy. What he’s put on film is horrid.

That’s a lot of guarantees in that statement. in terms of need OT talent was priority. We need to score more points and you do that by building in the trenches.. I’m always big on SEC lineman on both sides of the ball. Big guys just win there. Especially when they’re athletic like this guy looks on film. none of us will know who is what without retrospect

A rookie shouldn’t beat out the vet we paid to buy time while icky heals and the rookie learns. We needed depth at tackle and help on the OL. it was a must honestly.

wtf. Can you say high expectations

Why won’t he be a starter?

An offensive lineman. I don’t think anything holds more value to the offense than that position group. my point being is you can find guys you like for the value you in every round. And if in the early rounds no skill positions are valued high enough to justify then just look at the next group. If that’s oline then I say go for it. I think BPA is what you have to do early. but poo I’m just chilling on my arm chair typing this poo.

To be fair. Most post that I see from you come from a place of negativity. I think being so cut throat on things like the draft seem to me as if those thoughts are lacking their due diligence. There isn’t any one position that I think holds more value to the team than another except for the QB position. So adding pieces in any manner helps. I do agree you have to take into account needs and where we are short. But if we pulled a receiver out of the draft that was like Jamar Chase. I don’t think you’re singing that tune. Or passing on a guy that caliber for let’s say and OT that is equitable to Ekwonu. both play their parts in making the team better or worse but one can be a game changer. i think early on with your picks the best approach is looking for a game changer at any position. And hopefully that falls in line with our needs. But if not, and we land a generational talent then that can help us win. and I do understand value and positionally where that can be a reach. So I do understand your take. But saying the FO is failure by drafting a certain position group before seeing the cat play is short sighted IMO

Now let us fans cook.

Dan needs to make a call, and see how Sean is doing. Bills did him dirty. I understand they say he was the one that wanted Coleman. But who gives AF he’s had them contending every single year since they got Josh Allen. Seans defensive mindset would be welcomed here. I remember him being much more situationally aware than evero. Here’s to hoping the raiders offer evero a bag he can’t resist and by proxy Sean McDermott comes back to us.

It’s a good point. A lot of people are upset with our pass rush production, but the schemes allows for the QBs to get the ball out fast bc our DBs are consistently 7-8 yards off the ball. Evero is absolutely terrified to run man pressure. And the crazy part is if he did, his zone could eat QBs alive. He just uses it far to often with no disguise and the QBs know where the weak spot is

Evero is more a problem than Canales. Canales needs to get the playbook out of his hands too though. First and second down with 3 times out and 30+ seconds and your calling shot plays? that’s almost as bad as evero sitting in or prevent D vs the league MVP at QB who has made a living destroying the zone defense schemes. this coaching staff doesn’t learn and adapt and especially evero

Anyone that watched all year could tell you our schemes are ass and don’t put our guys in the best position to succeed

We still hating on Bryce after this one? anyone with a brain could tell that we got out coached Again, Bryce may not be the long term option but tonight once again was not the reason we fell short

His scheme hasn’t worked much at all tbh. We consistently give up 3rd and longs in his soft zone. He cannot generate a pass rush to save his life. He brings in linebackers that cant cover and forces them to play zone. And he the worst defense in NFL history last year. the defense played better because we have a great defensive back and solid interior DL. We get better on the edge at linebacker and bring in a coordinator that plays to win our defense could be lights out