travisura

15 hours ago, 7CLOWNS said:

Carolina chances of trading back 15%

Carolina trading  into the first to get their guy is 60%

Carolina trading for a very liked WR just went up %5(was 0 this morning but a new deal is getting worked on

Carolina stays is 0% 

Carolina know who they want but news coming in says he may not be available if they wait 

 

 

48 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

I think the Rams want him and they are going to be bold about it.   Popcorn needs to be ready--Chicago at #9 (Rams Bears trade)?

I hope the first round is as chaotic as it’s shaping up to be

13 minutes ago, electro's horse said:

ftr if anyone cares, i would prefer the panthers trade out of 33.

if they can come away with another pick later in the 2nd round and a first next season, they have to take that.

They won't get that kind of offer.

3 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

JJ isn't making it out of the first.  Penix or Nix would be out best bet for a trade down from 33.

That's my hot take for this draft: that the JJ smoke is all bluster and he'll end up falling. Or he could go top 5 I have no idea.

37 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Best case for us is that pennix and jj slip out of the first

I'm 100% sure they will, but I'm also sure that there is not going to be a huge haul to trade up to 33. The Titans traded picks 41, 72 and a third rounder in 2024 for picks 33 and 81 so they could get Levis. Not exactly franchise altering compensation.

5 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I'd be shocked as hell is Bowers was available in the late 1st. If he falls out of the top 15. All the WR talent might push him out of the top 10. He'd be a top 10 lock in most drafts.

I'd be surprised if he didn't go to the Jets at 10. They need OL but a better weapon for Rogers is sexier.

Ruuuuuuuke goes hard.

11 minutes ago, CRA said:

I think Canales probably just straight up told Leggette that.   That happens all the time.  Canales just doing what literally every coach would be forced to do if a player right before the draft went to the media and said it.  That, almost never happens. 

Yeah I'm pretty sure Legette broke an unwritten rule about pre-draft player/team relations lol.

9 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

What's the question?

"So we draft you at 33, what happens now? And then there's a bunch of questions that happen after that."

2 minutes ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

Not to derail this thread, but there's already a QB we passed on that makes us look dumb.  Caleb would have to be quite the player to outshine he who will not be named here.

1 minute ago, CRA said:

true, but to date it is what it is.  Looks comically bad.   But if Bryce doesn't develop of Caleb busts.....the trade still looks like the Panthers manage assets like clowns. 

And we certainly did under Rhule + Fitterer. It all points back to the guy in your avi, who, coincidentally, is already donning the clown attire.

4 minutes ago, CRA said:

I mean you only can devote so much time to the worst team in professional sports….its bad business.   But the jabs and low blows will always be there. 

 

The trade won't look nearly as bad if Caleb is mentally weak, idiotic, and a mega clown like you say he is.

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Yep, we're inextricably linked to Caleb Williams no matter what.

Just like Hornets fans are the only fanbase that cares that the Hornets traded Kobe on draft night, the only people who are gonna care about Caleb being drafted with our pick are on this board. It's barely ever mentioned even now and it'll just be a trivia fact as time goes on. No one cares about the Panthers.

4 minutes ago, Tbe said:

Here are some numbers I found. Posted this a few months back.

2nd round - about 33% of players drafted in the 2nd round developed into a solid NFL starter. It’s higher for the top of the round. From here, it dropped by 50% per round.

3rd round - about 16%.

4th round - about 8%.

If you do the math, selecting two 3rd rounders gives you a 29.44% chance of gaining ONE long term starter.

Thats less than the odds for a single high 2nd.

 

1 quarter, 2 dimes, etc.

3 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

Why would they have 4 alternate jerseys? 

Two alternates. Home, Away, Alternate #1 and Alternate #2. I guess the league must've relaxed the rules on only having one alternate jersey.

But my point was that the Home and Away combos both are just slightly tweaked from what they were. 

Looks like their main combos are more evolution than revolution. Y'all are freaking out over some alternates lmao.

4 minutes ago, Bear Hands said:

Broncos just did as well - been rumored for a bit:

 

Broncos unis were straight ass. These are a good update.

55 minutes ago, Captain Morgan said:

 

47 minutes ago, Captain Morgan said:

 

Very meaningful takeaways here from Mr. Newton.

18 minutes ago, FatChad said:

I think as an owner he is allowed to critique and get explanations for play calling post-game.  If anything, I'm glad he is interested in learning more about the game.  I'm sure most if not all owners do this.  

Explanations? Absolutely. Critiques? I just don't trust that he has enough football knowledge to provide meaningful critiques beyond "something's not working, fix it." We have one sentence in a tweet with a screenshot of a write-up that wasn't cited so we need more context about how these meetings went down.

Jesus H.

I know this is not a serious question, but a billionaire ego like Tepper is never going to admit he doesn't know what he's doing.

Looks like he's about to fire off a hot take on the carolinahuddle.com

12 minutes ago, rayzor said:

jersey/pants combos are, by far, the least of my concerns with this team.

if they are losing, it doesn't matter what they wear...it all sucks.

if they are winning. who cares what they are wearing? 

but it's the offseason and we're bored, so here we are...again.

Better this than bitching and moaning about Bryce's offseason workout routine ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

1 hour ago, KillerKat said:

The logo looks bad on black helmets though. You can barely see it. They need to do something to fix that. I didnt really like it.

The logo looks bad because for some reason they went with a monochrome logo on matte black helmets. Should be the standard logo on metallic black helmets.

White on black looks fine, it just looks odd to us Panther fans because we've been beat over the head with white on white for 20+ years.