travisura

Damn that monochrome logo. Looks like shite.

For real. It was more tolerable when both the pants and helmet were truly silver, but now that the pants are a matte gray it looks terrible. Just rock with black, blue, and white.

He was going to come to Charlotte to meet with the FO the Monday after the Saints swooped in and signed him the day before on Sunday. It’s been debated as to whether our interest was serious, whether we were just doing due diligence, or if we were in it to drive the price up for the Saints. I don’t think anyone knows for sure.

I think you can rest assured that it’s gonna be a QB lol

Only the jerseys are discounted across the board on NFL Shop. I’d think if it was a top to bottom rebrand then everything would be on sale.

How many NFL logos are intimidating?

I sincerely hope it’s not a top to bottom rebranding. The uniforms could use a modernization but the logo, font, and overall branding are all great and don’t need changed.

But make the logo on the black helmets the standard logo, not the monochrome blue one they used last season for some reason.

It's just cope. It'll be fine.

Probably the right choice. He turned a corner after the Atlanta game, and Zane hasn't been able to consistently stay on the field.

I've been on the Stroud wagon but honestly I have no idea who will end up better. I'll be happy with either him or Young. Exciting times are ahead.

It's not baffling if you know why they hate Cam.

Best way to sell tickets and merch is to win games, best way to win games is to let the coaches pick their QB. I think you're overstating the impact Young/Richardson would have on their own. No one's gonna pay to see either of them if the team is 6-11.

They keep slamming our defensive performance last year, which is fair enough, but they're acting as if that's a good basis to project how the defense will do this year, which I don't think holds up.

Keep it a buck = keep it = keep it real

You know what they say about broken clocks. Or two broken clocks, in this case.

Not based off of comments from Reich/Fitts. If anything I think the interviews could have more weight than watching them throw without a defense.

Lol. Trust who you want based on their reporting record, not off of how they word their tweet or if they use the word "sources". Yes you fugging genius if the source gets fired they can't continue to get some SUPER SECRET SCOOP can they?

Same guy who had us taking a tackle at 9 before we moved up?

Sure, and that's your prerogative. But to disparage any potential insider information as false just because the source isn't named, which is what bully consistently does, is foolish. You have to go by the record of each individual reporter/journalist. I'm not saying that you have to believe someone who claims to have sources, but if you didn't believe anyone who doesn't give their sources away then that would preclude you from believing anyone at all, even Schefter and Rapoport.

Do you genuinely not understand how sports reporting works? Everyone, even Schefter and Rapoport, have "sources" that they will not name, so that the source can maintain anonymity and the reporters can continue to get information from them. The fact that the source is not named is not an indictment on the accuracy of the information at all.

None of these numbers are high to me. 9 in 30 games is not even one every 3 games.