BrisbanePanther

I personally think that just like some don't want to reach on a QB at the top of a draft, that's also the one position where you don't draft for value. QB is the only position where you should draft when and where you want, not because he was good value or was BPA. How many BPA or value QBs have delivered championships? Besides, with QB, true value is not defined by the number where they were drafted, but by the numberof seasons in SB conversations. No one cares now about the draft capital that Buffalo and KC gave up to draft theirs where they wanted them. I think if FO believes that Young or Stroud is the guy, package the picks to move up. If they don't, I'd rather they focus on skill positions, and then package picks next year for Maye or Williams.

The answer is no one. If we want one of the top two, do what we need to get them. Drafting a QB elsewhere may be a wasted pick IMO.

Young for sure. Hoping what @TheCasillassays is true...I find it very believable and very Texans. The only x-factor is Caserio might have connections to Saban thru Belichick. Saban could sell him on Young.

Ultimate test to determine his long someone's been a fan. Randy Fasani instantly came to mind...and I'm not sure there's a close second. Matt Moore is on that list, as is Chris Weinke. This link tells why many long-term fans have had enough of the bargain-bin, "just manage the game and don't mess it up" QBs. Those names...just lol. Compare that to Green Bay's list for the same time period-- Brett Favre and Aaron Rodgers (with a couple blinks by Jordan Love). https://wkml.com/listicle/every-carolina-panthers-starting-quarterback-in-team-history/

How often to 5 and 6-win teams eventually win the Super Bowl? And how long do they take? Seems like worst-to-first happens a lot more often. 5- and 6-win teams seem to think that they're *this* close, and then they spend stupidly on free agents and make weird trades that cost them later...only to still win 5 or 6 games...maybe 7 or 8.

I didn't see the game as a judgement on Willis as much as it's an indictment on drafting tons of players on defense and treating offensive skill positions as an inconvenience and QBs as a luxury for next year. TEN's WRs and TEs are non-existent and didn't catch any of the few balls Willis managed to get to them. They may be the worst WR room in the league. Locking KC down to 9 points for 3.5 quarters should be a win everyday if you have an offense that can score. A lights out D with no offense is near useless in today's game.

So confused on this. Why is only "reaching" when it's for a QB--particularly on today's wage scales? Why the hand-wringing in favor of yet another (usually) defensive player that will be either neutralized by better competition or exhausted because his offense can't stay on the field. Carolina has no bust QBs...because they don't draft them in the first round aside from Collins and Cam. 2 1st round QBs in almost 30 years? I could see if that was because of long-term success, but it's not. It's been because "bigger needs" we're always addressed first, with the QB left as an afterthought.

We seem to go through this all the time. If the pick is a QB, it should be Young or Stroud. That's it--that's the list. Many of us have a Weber or some other kind of smoker--how many of you know of someone else who loudly claims that their homemade smoker made from a old drum is better at ribs than your "overpriced" smoker? They have pride in turning something from nothing--which I understand--and sometimes they can turn out to be better cookers but it's rare and totally dependent on the skills of the person making and using them. The Huddle seems overpopulated with these drum smoker makers...when there's already high-quality smokers out there. If Carolina is at the top of the draft, take Young (my preference) or Stroud. Don't get too cute with manufacturing a case for anyone else--Hooker, Duggan, Levis, or whoever else.

He might spend much of that decade as a stud for someone else too. Same old story--some really good defensive player is a "keep at all costs" player, who then re-sogns and has Huddlers packing his bags almost immediately thereafter. Too often, Huddle says, "we can't make _______ move cause we have to pay __, ___, _____, and ______. Then they all get paid and before the ink is dry on their extensions, they can't be pushed out the door fast enough. See Johnson, Charles; Short, Kawann; Gamble; Chris; Davis, Thomas; Beason, Jon; and other big name defensive players not named Keuchly. Trading him now just speeds up the cycle of the inevitable wanting him out of town and drafting his replacement over everlasting offensive needs.

I knew Darnold was a dud from the beginning. His jersey number is 14. When has a QB wearing 14 ever been great? I'm only partially kidding I still didn't see Sam as a Dan Fouts but thought Brad Johnson was at least a stretch (Armstrong) target. Seriously though, it would be interesting to see a statistical connection between jersey numbers and success--if there is one (probably not). I guess interesting enough for the Indy Star to do a story on it: https://www.indystar.com/story/sports/nfl/colts/2021/02/23/nfl-best-quarterback-numbers-in-history/4555068001/

Team is going nowhere. San Antonio? Cowboys territory? Yeah, like Jerruh is letting that happen. Oklahoma City--who can't fill their NBA arena? Is basically Far North Dallas? Yeah, like Jerruh is letting that happen. St Louis? Nope--already had two turns at a team. Portland? Nope--would never build a publicly-financed stadium. Honolulu? Aloha Stadium is a dump and they're limited in public money. Memphis? No, declining population and decrepit stadium. Columbus? Would mean three(!) teams in Ohio, so no. Louisville? Already has three teams 2-3 hr drive away from them. Orlando? Would give Florida a fourth (!) team and puts it less than two hours from two other teams. Anchorage? Just lol. Salt Lake City? Too small and Denver likely says no. Oakland? Stadium is a dump and they may lose the A's--any stadium would have to be privately funded and given local politics would be required to supply thousands of housing units. San Diego? Getting a new stadium, but it's for SDSU, and is small. See how ridiculous this concept is? In fact, every available US city has flaws. The only cities that stand a chance are London and Toronto, which any sane person would move a market-size based business to from Charlotte to anyway. The Bills might not like a team in Toronto, but the Pegulas aren't the Jones. I honestly think if the Hornets had never moved in '01, the thought of moving the Panthers would never enter anyone's mind. There is clearly some type of "team relocation" PTSD happening here.

I always wonder if people think this part through. Btw, only place worth the trouble is London...it would be like Cornwallis' revenge.

Maybe Vlade, David Wesley, Okafor (either for himself as the first Bobcats pick or because he wasn't Dwight Howard).

But wasn't the story that he wouldn't fully guarantee the contract like Cleveland did--otherwise the trade would have happened here instead of Cleveland? I still think the assets traded were minimal compared to what Houston thought they'd get (no young players at all). It was the guaranteed money in the end that stopped that deal, and well, Tepper easily speaks that language.

GM is supposed to say this. It can only be downhill to say otherwise.

Also, because they aren't willing is more reason to take him--as opposed to Mayfield or Jimmy G who Cleveland and SF want to get rid of.

I don't think they are are willing--but it could be a force out situation. We forget that Arizona ownership does not have a legacy of being well-regarded.

Rather than parroting the whole, "he doesn't watch film" as a problem with Murray, I used the Googlebox to see where that even came from. Turns out it's from here: https://www.nytimes.com/2021/12/23/sports/football/kyler-murray.html Other gems from the article include: “I knew what I wanted to do in my life,” Murray said. “In order to get there, going out and doing drugs, none of that was for me. I’ve never smoked in my life. I want to be the greatest to ever play. That’s always been my mentality.” "Probing deeper into that mentality, one M.L.B. team, while scouting him heading into the draft, developed a psychological profile. The results revealed traits that signified an elite mental makeup: intense competitiveness and both an inability to understand losing and cope with it." “Kyler doesn’t have the ability to be empathetic out there. If you don’t want to win, if you don’t want to compete, he literally doesn’t understand it. It doesn’t compute in his brain.” There's tons of other points in the article, which while it may be a bit of a puff piece, tells me for sure that if he's available, you go get him today. Then again, as Panther fans, we're used to "aw, shucks, better luck next time". Win or else might turn us off.

Wasn't his injury to his throwing shoulder? Mobile or not, seems that would be more the culprit than mobility?

I don't know how it is in Charlotte, but here in Australia, used cars have gotten way too expensive and in some cases rival costs of new ones. If you've got no car and questionable (credit) history, your choices are to overpay for a used one or keep walking . Murray is the best available known quantity that may become available. If it's Pickett vs Murray, take Murray. If it's Willis vs Murray, take Murray. I'd send #6 and some Day 2 picks next year and even a #1 in 2024 to get it done. Watson went for way less than anyone thought (no players at all and fewer picks than Houston claimed it would take). The same could happen here, especially since we'd be on the hook for an extension.

Haha! Sounds good to me--future Gabba tenant post-Olympics? Tick. Rip QEII down and replace with the practice facility? Tick.

I keep seeing people say this, but where would he actually move them to outside the Carolinas? The pickins are slim. St Louis? They still have no stadium, have lost teams twice, and probably not the base to add value. Salt Lake City? No stadium and probably at their limit for teams to split local corporate dollars. Portland? No stadium, unlikely to build one, and probably too close to Seattle. Oakland? A dump of a stadium, soon to lose the A's, already lost the Raiders, and the region has moved on. San Antonio? No stadium, decent market size when combined with Austin, but the Texans AND Cowboys won't let it happen. Orlando? Maybe, but FL may be at it's market max. Louisville? Colts territory likely--and again, no stadium. Toronto? Maybe--definitely better choice than any US option. London? Maybe--same situation as Toronto. So it's Toronto or London--and if we hear of them starting discussions with either place, I wouldn't worry as a fan. The government will and give them new digs, but that's the extent of it.

Weird that this is an even a debate. If there's a chance at bringing the mighty mouse in, you do it and don't think twice. Seems that some here would've said no to Brees too because he had a huge injury and couldn't see over his OL. This franchise has had ONE QB of note in almost three decades. Maybe we just don't know one when we see one. Then again, if you've spent basically your whole existence with Chevettes, maybe you would spend more time dismissing a Porsche because it has no back seat.

Rather they not trade for him, not just because of the accusations but also because he got himself in the situation in the first place. Even if he did none of what he's accused of, I'd (naively) rather he be a risk-averse person who can quickly know that Insta DMs always get outed, so just don't make any. Go to Six Flags for entertainment rather than a nightclub. Be home before midnight. Only get massages at the training facility by your staff because you don't have to pay them. Yep, it's boring and yep, it's a very un-2020s life, but it'll keep you well-paid and well-regarded. Not saying it's fair but it's the price of being a public figure and at least so far people like Mahomes, Jackson, Brady, and Stafford seem to navigate this just fine. I'd remain a fan if he was on the team though, but there'd always be this reservation like if I had won Powerball because I cheated and had intel on the winning numbers. Then again my fandom is limited to more scorekeeping and highlights-watching now, so maybe it's not much different.

Agree with the underlying sentiment, but in that just know that you can and will be called out for making on the basis of having a wife/daughter/sister/mother, etc. I live in Australia. The prime minister was roundly criticized for this in responding to an assault on a female staffer at Parliament House. He actually said, "Jenny (his wife) said (to him), 'what if it were our daughters?'". He got destroyed because he wasn't angry at it happening to a human being, full stop, rather than needing to link it to being a dad to girls. Bottom line, anyone making a stand against this red line is expected to make it regardless rather than qualify it because of who someone is to someone else.