Catsfan69
HUDDLER-
Posts
7,005 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Huddle Wiki
Forums
Gallery
Everything posted by Catsfan69
-
Carolina Panthers agree to terms with Cam Newton.
Catsfan69 replied to Zod's topic in Carolina Panthers
That's still not good enough. If his physical ceiling is less than Darnold even though his mental level is way higher it's not good enough. Can he win us a Superbowl in the next 5 years yes or no. If the answer is no then he shouldn't be here. I only care about winning a championship. -
Carolina Panthers agree to terms with Cam Newton.
Catsfan69 replied to Zod's topic in Carolina Panthers
If he can look pre TJ Watt it will be awesome but what are the odds? -
Carolina Panthers agree to terms with Cam Newton.
Catsfan69 replied to Zod's topic in Carolina Panthers
Did we need a second thread? The meeting with thread could have just changed to signed. -
Lol the clothes comments alone are going to be delicious. Already have fans of other teams asking if he's wearing capris today.
-
I understand that at no time would anyone with a brain not instantly trade for the other guys on that list. You honestly think he's better than Rodgers at any point in his career? Brady? Wilson? No, he could never throw the ball that well. Never.
-
What part of that is false?
-
He was never a top 5 QB. He was a great Football player for us. One of the best we ever had. But on average he was the 10th best QB in the league. Elite is top 5 and when he was playing Brady, Breese, Wilson, Rodgers, Roethlisberger, Rivers were all way better. MVP doesn't mean best QB.
-
James I don't think there's a QB that can get us to a Superbowl victory out there right now including Cam Newton that's available. I don't think there's a good enough college QB. I don't think Howell is it. I could be wrong on the college QBs tho.
-
Lol Cam was never elite either. You people are ridiculous.
-
The downside is missing Corral or Howell You guys are already bitching about Fields and Jones.
-
2018 Cam had all the time in the world to throw
-
Matt Barkley was never going to be the starter
-
It's a realistic question. Two days this week.
-
We've been talking tank for a week at least.
-
Another sensible question. How is he supposed to learn the offense?
-
If we do sign him he will win some games and it will just keep our Superbowl hopes pushed back 5 or 6 more years. Honestly it's the wrong move if you're thinking long term and championship. Cam doesn't have the ability to win a Superbowl. Oh well you got your wish for a feel good dopamine rush.
-
But what if we don't want to win? We are at the point now that winning is bad.
-
A bunch of one and two yard tds isn't overly impressive. I mean yeah they are tds but nothing special.
-
If people really want Howell (I don't) then any more wins hurts us.
-
That was inexcusable an anyone who says otherwise is an idiot.
-
Why is losing more fun? Losing is losing. There's not more fun to it.
-
The problem is we need to tank and he might win 3 games. That hurts us.
-
Lol
-
Honestly he doesn't. Rushing TDs are football plays not QB plays. If someone was to say Cam last year was a good football player I would agree. Someone saying Cam was a good QB last year I would disagree.
-
Honestly I don't really measure QBs by running. That's what RBs are for.