Gin and Juice

There is a huge difference between good job and exceptional job! You right, TRich was suppose to be a stud and he wasn't! It goes like that sometimes. No matter how much homework staffs do, players are human and not machines! They change! Stewart is good, sometimes exceptional, and often injured! We have established that we can't cut him because financial impact(thanks to your boy clinging to the little talent we had), doesn't mean he gets a free penciled in place at starter! Stewart goes out, we pass on Coleman in 2nd and Fozzy avg 1.8ypc! Huddle will crash

Not disputing that you can get stud RBs in late Rds. I just want the stud player regardless of his position! This year appears to be a good class for RBs. A lot of mocks have first rd worthy RBs going in 2 and 3, again back to your positional devaluation trend. The fan mocks we post, most have us taking an RB in 2 or 3 round and you chime in saying "waste pick." I posted the OT vs RB bit to illustrate the probability of getting a stud tackle goes down after first 45 picks. The players I listed were 3 pro bowlers vs 3 mediocre at their positions. All the pro bowlers were running backs! I challenge you to look up the drafts of the last 8 years and tell me the likelihood of us getting a Stud OT, much less a stud LT, after pick 57! Not saying it can't happen, just what are the odds that it could? Bellichek has figured out that 25% percent of his picks are contributing players! If you need 3, then make sure you have 12 picks. Probability and statistics play a big part in the draft as it should.

Ok, you are arguing the point that we should reach for a T, no matter what. I don't really have to see us draft a RB. I just don't want us drafting a reach of a tackle when players with Pro Bowl potential are on the board. Regardless of the position, you want to draft the most talented player at their position. If there comes a day where we need a position upgrade and we have multiple studs at a position the we can trade for what we need, but you can't get to be that way drafting for need! If Gman can implement his will, in 5 years, we will have more trade transactions than any other team! We will also be the most stacked talent wise! Now, my wet dream is we draft 8 starters this year with 2 OT's among those 8. However, history defies the odds of getting 2 starting OT's in the same draft. My point behind taking Gordon or Coleman, what if they are studs and they can be! If JStew is our no.2 RB because we have a better RB than him, then we are a better team. If our "committee" consist of 2 pro bowl caliber RB's then we are set and in the biggest way being, not having to offer outrageous contracts to keep what little talent we have

2011: Marcus Gilbert or Demarco Murray? 2012: Bobby Massie or Alfred Morris? 2013: Terron Armstead or Eddie Lacy? Best OT vs Best RB after pick 57! Which players add talent to our team?

So Stewart is better than anyone in this draft? Even when injured? You know this to be fact?

I gotta know! How do you know it's a non starter?

Over rated or over hyped?-easy, Johnny Football Under rated?-Offensive linemen

Done

He is this year's DaRick Rogers

Lol at people entertaining the idea of him being back. His best day in life will be opening day of FA when he receives numerous text from his agent about all the money he is being offered

It's been over a year since Hardy was relevant on the football field! You are right, the glaring hole on our DE tandem has been noticed. A lot of players could have filled that role for 3/4 of the season, but hey, Ealy got some quick lessons

I would shoot the mofo forcing me to pick....neither are easily replaced! Luke will be around longer tho

Lol, what Panther team do you watch?

The main point...if he had gotten hurt playing under the tag? Severely hurt. He possibly wouldn't have gotten a long term deal at all

What cost more-severe injury or not guilty verdict on an appeal?

Someone tell me how it isn't possible? Can't blame the guy if he did

Lol, easy guys. It's not a secret that players dread the tag. Hardy had played for pennies on his level of production. Now DG says, no CJ contract for you....we will just tag you. Mere days later, the "incident" occurs. He is being treated as bad as Ray Rice over a bunch of he said/she said BS. Did players know about the Rice thing before it blew up? Pay Holder 50,000 to act the part? Make no effort to express the desire to play? How many honestly think he will not win the appeal? That conviently gets pushed back past the close of the season?

Starting to wonder if this fiasco surrounding Hardy is by design on his behalf? Fact: Players hate the tag because if the player suffers a career ending injury then a huge payday is lost. Some parts of this ordeal seem so ridiculous that you would almost think Hardy has no desire to play this season. What say you to the notion that Hardy has fabricated this event in order to keep the current payday while hitting the open market next year in healthy form?

The new official Dig Dug tester!

Everyone needs to look at one huge clue: They had been together since September. He just got the largest single payday EVER with his advance. Dig Dug all of a sudden goes bat poo crazy and files assault charges on him and he was the one that called 911. Charges dropped and case closed. Hardy, upgrade to 1st class dig dug. They take a lot of poo to get a ring, then they clean you out

Not true, gold digging white girls are craziest! The rest.....are just crazy. Plain and simple, Hardy was leveling up in gold diggers with his new contract and the current dig dug snapped, for she knew that league was unobtainable for her.

The key for the Panther offense this game is having Cam run a lot out of a hurry up offense! Keeping the Arizona D unsettled!