mrcompletely11

Thats a good question. We have to assume he will not be 100% until later in the year at best and we are not winning anything this season. So maybe the 2nd best center this season and then simply draft the top rb next year as the roster is getting built out. All I know is corbett has been hurt 2x now and we are asking him to play a position in the nfl he never has. And I guess backing him up is another player thats been hurt 2x thats never played the position in the nfl. I dont know man that seems like a massive red flag on the line for a qb that doesnt like pressure

if we are relying on a guy who has never played center coming off a season ending injury to be the center then we are not even giving bryce a chance........oh wait we are and its his back up as well

dan morgan like young, didnt want to trade burns, liked dj johnson and pushed for jamie robinson if people are skeptical its not blindly

I want to believe he is a wonder kid play caller, but godalmighty there are a ton of red flags going against this. I truly would like to know what we were the only interview he got. Nobody else thought he was worthy to simply bring in and listen to what he has to say especially since he is a supposed qb and wr whisperer

they got to preseason specifically the jets scrimmage and were like "oh fug, oh fug" and it didnt really get any better from there

so is that first from the rams in 24 still devalued?

I bet TMJ balls out..........again

if 2.7 seconds isnt coach speak then XL is a pick for the next qb

if the game plan is to simply run the ball to make young a game manager then yeah we are truly fuged on so many levels, I gotta think that is all coach speak and he has a modern day nfl offense planned.

this is such a bullshit rationale that is fed from GM's. A future second is worth exactly a future 2nd for a franchise. It may not be apples to apples in regards to gm as they may not be choosing. But there is no negative value assign for trading picks in the future. It makes no sense to try and devalue. If so then you would see the adverse affect in play

morgan agreed

Spring game aside (where his highlights are pretty nice) Arch hasnt even taken a snap yet

in his 3rd year?

between stewat, dwill, cmac and sanders (feels like I am missing one) us fans could see in real time slow motion that every one of those deals was a mistake

This franchise will absolutely never learn about running back contracts.

No none qb is worth not taking that deal

100% but miles stunk out of the gate when he did finally play

Dude on fnz who calls the gamecocks radio went into it hard how in the offseason XL went heavy on nutrition and weight lifting to get to where he is. Thinks that is a big reason and also he was the only wr and he raved how good rattler was.

depending on mayo the pats could be pretty bad with brissette starting and maye taking over halfway or so in.

https://www.thefantasyfootballers.com/analysis/the-impact-of-acl-surgery-on-fantasy-performance-running-backs/ https://www.statcrunch.com/reports/view?reportid=31371&tab=preview A few examples, not a full list just cherry picks it looks like all in all it looks like it takes a full 2 years to get everything back

Miles was bad for sure, but our line also sucked ass and he was hurt for a good bit of the season. Maybe he mailed it in last year after getting paid but he wasnt that bad in philly, he cant catch a cold but he was a decent enough runner

Full disclosure I probably wouldnt have blown a high pick on wilson, but if last year was his peak he is still going to be a damn good linebacker for pitt. Dude was a master player caller and simply all over the field. The not having an acl is curious as hell because he was unstoppable last season

mac and bone were borderline unlistenable today. I had to cut it off halfway through their draft "evaluation" There is being a homer and happy about the draft and then there is that. Whatever over the top balls in mouth analysis you want to call it but it was not rational.

I more or less agee but getting a 2nd next year moves this up a grade. But solely on the players and where they were draft C feels right