mrcompletely11

Dude on fnz who calls the gamecocks radio went into it hard how in the offseason XL went heavy on nutrition and weight lifting to get to where he is. Thinks that is a big reason and also he was the only wr and he raved how good rattler was.

depending on mayo the pats could be pretty bad with brissette starting and maye taking over halfway or so in.

https://www.thefantasyfootballers.com/analysis/the-impact-of-acl-surgery-on-fantasy-performance-running-backs/ https://www.statcrunch.com/reports/view?reportid=31371&tab=preview A few examples, not a full list just cherry picks it looks like all in all it looks like it takes a full 2 years to get everything back

Miles was bad for sure, but our line also sucked ass and he was hurt for a good bit of the season. Maybe he mailed it in last year after getting paid but he wasnt that bad in philly, he cant catch a cold but he was a decent enough runner

Full disclosure I probably wouldnt have blown a high pick on wilson, but if last year was his peak he is still going to be a damn good linebacker for pitt. Dude was a master player caller and simply all over the field. The not having an acl is curious as hell because he was unstoppable last season

mac and bone were borderline unlistenable today. I had to cut it off halfway through their draft "evaluation" There is being a homer and happy about the draft and then there is that. Whatever over the top balls in mouth analysis you want to call it but it was not rational.

I more or less agee but getting a 2nd next year moves this up a grade. But solely on the players and where they were draft C feels right

I'd take it in a heartbeat

beck has a cannon

vegas odds say no, take that what you will

the 5th isnt that big of a deal, the bills clearly valued a pick 59 slots higher then a 5th option, if its that big a no brainer you would see more teams trading back into the first

b for the second rounder in 25, C for the players

best play in panther history

Time will tell for sure but a lot of consensus "C" and "B-" in here. https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-1-d&q=nfl+draft+grades

6 wins

the first 3 picks of a hurt rb and 2 developmental picks set this class back a bit. Sanders and the 2nd right the ship a bit but out of the gates morgan needed to get his sea legs

because he isnt good, not sure why we burned a 30 on him

the trading up for a hurt running back in the 2nd is a head scratcher all things considered, but recouping a 2nd for 25 puts this draft class at a solid c+/B

I am willing to have an open mind, but after not having a good draft in God knows how many years and with the same structure is in place, he kindof has a point. Being blindly optimistic is pretty nuts at this point

did we really bring in rice on a 30 visit? Goddamn

I am not disagreeing with any of that. But its patently clear that at 32 beane reached out to morgan and fuged with him a bit. The bills dont care about the 5th option and wanted to see what they could get from morgan for 33/32. They knew who we wanted. That also gave them negotiating power for 33 if they wanted to trade. Its just a friend who is more experienced then you fuging around. Kudos to him, I hope morgan learns from it. As I said since yesterday the 5th year option isnt some magic cheat code, if it was you would see more trade ups to utilize it. If it held all this incredible leverage then the bills simply would have got coleman and held on to the 5th. I just dont think teams give 2 chits about something 5 years down the road

in that scenario they would still draft a qb in the top 10

if we are grading picks based on value/need, Sanders is an A+ I mean there is literally no downside for throwing this dart

100%. But I am guessing its like pranking your friends, its like "damn dude you totally fell for it". The bills clearly dont give 2 chits about the 5th, knew who we wanted obviously, and called morgan to see if he would bite. Spoiler alert, he did indeed bite.

nah dawg, beane played us, thats is pretty obvious now. There was no friendly favor going on