-
Posts
19,790 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Huddle Wiki
Forums
Gallery
Everything posted by mrcompletely11
-
again you are scared to simply answer the question
-
yeah I didnt think you would answer
-
@panthers55 1. Is MC a bigger project then Malik Willis? 2. Can you provide an example of a qb that has been developed this way? kthanks
-
You first. Why won't you answer. Oh I know why........
-
If rhule wasnt a total clusterfug for the first 2 seasons then he might have some good will built up and we would give him the benefit of the doubt. However everything he has done and said has been retarded so that is like you say, why we are having this conversation
-
Rodgers was drafted and then the #2 Answer my questions. Is MC a bigger project then Willis? And what prospect has been developed this way?
-
You have an example of a qb that was developed this way?
-
thats not why WG failed The process that is correct is right in front of your eyes. Look at pitt, atl, NE and tenn as examples. I am sorry you are not understanding this. They drafted rookies and had a plan for them and by gollly they played and all did reasonably well in their first game. Stashing someone and not working with them is not how you develop a qb in the nfl. You cannot point to one example of where its worked
-
its a tried and true method, its how qbs are brought along, rhule is just going against the grain for no reason. It makes no sense Now is MC a bigger project then Willis?
-
grier sucked but at least he was given a chance. Multiple chances in fact. We didnt draft him and then ship his ass to the 4rth string
-
is corral a bigger project then Malik willis?
-
you are missing the point entirely but thats to be expected I imagine
-
and willis? Howell? Zappe? Skyler? Ridder?
-
he developed Eli? Do tell.....
-
Rhule needs to read this and figure out a plan How is it that Willis, the biggest project in the draft coming from a gimmick college system has worked himself from 3rd string to 2nd? Now are you guys really saying MC is a bigger project then willis? its like magic, the more they give Willis the better he is getting. Amazing how that works Just like with pickett, both had some bad weeks in training camp but the team had a plan to get them up to speed. I cannot say the same thing for dumb dumb rhule https://titanswire.usatoday.com/2022/08/04/malik-willis-titans-qbs-coach-assessment/
-
Its frustrating he is either trolling or truly doesnt get it either one is bad
-
thats not quite the same as what we are saying but good try also how do you know with more reps and better coaching he couldnt be the backup? Do you think the skins, pitt or NE would freak out if their rookies had to play? Based on the past games I seriously doubt it, they somehow got their guys ready
-
No, teams do not spend a lot of draft capital on a qb and instantly delegate them to the 4rth string and not give them a chance to get better. atl, pitt, skins, Ne and even miami are not doing that But keep making excuses its pretty comical at this point
-
because it once again highlights rhules total incompetence
-
who is advocating for MC to start? Ill hang up and listen
-
Why are other teams doing it completely differently then? how many other teams played 4 qbs yesterday?
-
hyberbole much? And rhule just fuging said by getting more reps it helps you get better Jesus dude
-
by all accounts Pickett has had a horrible training camp but alas that coaching staff worked with him and we saw it pay dividends during his game
-
Then he is a moron and should have drafted Howell as well.
-
i thought i was using it as an oxymoron Sorry I am a chemist by nature