mrcompletely11

why not do weights? That seems to be the important aspect and most everyone on that list is well over 200lbs

You dont trade for picks straight up. If someone approached wanting that 2nd then they would to have to make it worth our while, which in most cases is additional pick(s). Its never a 1:1 trade

So did burns

Ive said all along I bet he is our pick for these reasons. We will not be in position for the big 3. We will have a new offensive minded coach with a long leash and time to develop AR and at the pajama olympics he is going to blow teams away. A new coach will be able to come in and figure out what to do with him. Sit him start him its up to the coach but he will not be in a "win now" mode like rhule seemingly was. And I dont know how I feel about that after watching a ton of AR

LOL dont ever stop being you mr glass

you need to draft AR in the first because of the 5th year option

1. Smallish 2. From a weird college offense 3. he is currently hurt with a major injury 4. he was a 3rd round pick 5. He looked bad in preseason

https://theathletic.com/podcast/211-the-athletic-football-show/?episode=529 Good discussion about the Burns trade offer from a couple of national guys. about 1:06 in basically said fitt didnt do it because of his job security, said good stable teams would do this 100 times out of 100 And a piece from the ringer https://www.theringer.com/nfl/2022/11/1/23435812/nfl-trade-deadline-winners-losers-dolphins-packers-vikings-bears Loser: The Carolina Panthers Sherman: It seemed like the biggest seller of the 2022 season was going to be the Carolina Panthers. They fired head coach Matt Rhule after Week 5, then traded WR Robbie Anderson and RB Christian McCaffrey after Week 6. With a bad record, a lame duck interim coach, and some of their best talent already out the door, the Panthers were essentially declaring their season over. Every player on the roster seemed to have a price tag on them. But on Tuesday, Albert Breer of Sports Illustrated reported a deal that the Panthers were apparently not interested in: The Rams offered them at least two first-round picks for star defensive end Brian Burns … and the Panthers said no. This isn’t about Brian Burns, who is a really solid player and currently ranked seventh in the NFL in QB pressures according to Pro Football Focus. He’s great! But two first-round picks. The Panthers didn’t even get a single first-rounder in exchange for McCaffrey—just one pick in each of the second, third, fourth, and fifth rounds. And they could’ve gotten two for Burns, who will be a free agent after next season. There are some extenuating circumstances. The Rams have already traded away most of their draft picks in between now and the heat death of the universe, so these first-round picks would be in the 2024 and 2025 drafts. And the Rams tend to be good, so they might have been late first-rounders. But still! Two first-round picks! The Panthers will be bad this year, and they’ll probably be bad next year. Why keep Burns for those two seasons instead of getting two massively valuable picks? Unless Burns is a franchise-type superstar who can dominate opposing offenses when the Panthers’ rebuild is complete, this seems like a missed opportunity.

Nothing really jumps off the screen there. His arm looks a little weak tbh

AR is an all world talent. Probably most talented qb prospect in ages. However he just needs a lot of coaching, seasoning, reps whatever you want to call it he needs it. But he has talent in spades

you mean 3rd rounders

It doesnt work like that

now do tackles and tfl

That still doesn't devalue the picks

Not for us. We are not winning this year or next

But in reality there are not any less in value

That's a simplistic way of looking at this.

Damn getting mocked now

Don't forget ron

I mean we've never won more than 5 games since he's been here so there's that

They are not even remotely close.

^^^ His tackles and tfl blow burns away

Yes vs the value of the picks right now, not in the future and that is what we are discussing and its not math its how things are valued on a chart

I understand it, but again its not apples to apples especially in regards to our situation

breer just said on cowherd that moore to the packers make sense