Jump to content

45catfan

HUDDLER
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    12,845

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by 45catfan

  1. 45catfan
    Called this one. https://pantherswire.usatoday.com/2023/03/06/panthers-report-plan-release-lb-damien-wilson/ Next up, Elflein.
  2. 45catfan
    Could be smoke with all this move up talk and we move back and take Hooker later in the first round. Perhaps we could move back up into the back end of the first round and take him there, taking BPA at #9. Either of those scenarios I like better than moving up. I mean, everyone wants a rookie QB this year, right? So they should be happy drafting Hooker.
  3. 45catfan
    Imagine we get to keep all our picks too? That's insane!
  4. 45catfan
    Yup and we still can draft a QB next season too. People are so damn desperate for a QB now that three 1st rounders, hell the next decade of 1st rounders, could be on the table. Musf Hov Muh Rouky Qartarbock!!!!
  5. 45catfan
    Everyone expected this to get done. That's the reason hardly any mocks had Seattle drafting QB even though one would have in all likelihood been available. The amount though? Ew wee mane did they overpay for ole Geno.
  6. 45catfan
    Did it matter to the Jets, Browns, Bears, 49ers, Jets (part deux), Giants etc, etc, etc...? You can cherry pick all you want, I ain't biting. You play a guy IF he's ready. Stroud and Young could be, be I'm not sold on them. Levis or AR will fall flat on their face if they start day 1. They aren't ready.
  7. 45catfan
    Absolutely not. So you are want to lose games while the rookie gets his feet wet? I mean, if you want to get a QB next year too, I guess accumulating loses makes sense.
  8. 45catfan
    You take the next best QB. Next year won't have the cliff after QB3/4 like this year. It will be more evenly staggered, like actual mid-to-late round 1 QB prospects.
  9. 45catfan
    No flaming here, you stole my playbook for the next two drafts though. It's cool, I didn't trademark the idea.
  10. 45catfan
    We are signing a veteran QB, I doubt any of the rookies would be starting for us, at least not the first portion of the season. Frank knows the first year development for a rookie QB is a monumental task, and we have a decent enough roster not to piss away winnable games while said rookie still has his training wheels firmly attached.
  11. 45catfan
    Even if the Bears manage a few more wins, with all that ammo, they can easily move back up to #1 if that team who holds it is willing to trade back. This is Fields make or break year. He either plays well enough to get that 5th year option door opened or the Bears are going to start planning for his exit and replacement.
  12. 45catfan
    Opposite Burns would be nasty.
  13. 45catfan
    This is assuming we didn't trade up and the top 4 QBs are gone by #9. Clam down, lol!
  14. 45catfan
    Just go to #6 then. The Lions are rolling with Goff. That gets us ahead of Vegas and Atlanta. It's only 250 trade value points. We could give them one of our 2nds this year and some late picks in 2024. Again, I want to stay put, but the less we give up the better.
  15. 45catfan
    Mayer with *incites a frenzy* a trade back.
  16. 45catfan
    Yup. Summed up perfectly, man.
  17. 45catfan
    Sorry, but those statements are contradictory. I agree with the second part, but that doesn't mesh with the first. Usually you need a solid running to take pressure off a rookie QB. Henry still has it, no doubt, but he's high priced and high mileage, neither of which I'm down with.
  18. 45catfan
    Too many miles, too much wear and tear and getting old in RB years. Not too mention the money he would require. The days of the 'bell cow' RB are over. Sure, it's still around, but rarer as time goes on. Plus, plenty of FAs and a deep draft this year at RB. Hard pass.
  19. 45catfan
    True, IF we do move up, #3 is better than #1 for me. I don't want to move up at all, but keeping our 2025 first round pick while getting a top QB is the smarter solution.
  20. 45catfan
    First move in FA is to slightly overpay for Brissett. Gotta happen, or a comp similar to him. Better to overpay him a couple million and get him off the market quickly than keep getting deeper down the list in talent with the FA QBs. Like it or not folks, we GOT to have a veteran QB on this roster, though not necessarily the starter. It would be irresponsible not to.
  21. 45catfan
    He always relished himself as an outsider and when he went to work for "The Man" it seemed like a bad marriage. He likes the Panthers and the allure of working for them was probably a once in a lifetime opportunity, but it always felt like he wouldn't be a lifer with the organization.
  22. 45catfan
    So they win a weak division, get their teeth kicked in during the playoffs and keep their cycle of never rebuilding alive for another year or two? Great! When they utterly implode in a couple of seasons, we should be peaking. Perfect timing.
  23. 45catfan
    People are sleeping on the Raiders and Falcons. Assuming Rodgers goes back to Green Bay, that leaves the Jets, Saints, Raiders and Falcons vying for Carr and Jimmy G. Two teams looking at the veteran route is going to have to go rookie QB unless settling on a 3rd tier veteran. I can't see either the Jets, Raiders or Saints going that route, possibly the Falcons.
  24. 45catfan
    Hopefully, Tepper stays out of this, but I doubt it. Maybe he learned his lesson form Rhule and lets the football people do their jobs he's paying them to do. Obviously he's going to be in the loop, I mean influencing decisions.
  25. 45catfan
    All he'd have to do is Google QB draft history to find out his statement about QBs "falling" to #9 is utter nonsense. Plenty of solid QBs have been drafted outside the top 5, even some outside the top 10.
×
×
  • Create New...