45catfan

Yes, and what I am advocating. Either him or Minshew.

Really like this one.

We have got to sign a FA, there's no way around it. There is not a day 1 QB in this draft, Young being the closest. That being said, the choice is a stop gap or go big for a guy that can be effective and lead this team to heights not seen in many years. The Bridgewater, Darnold, Mayfield model of 'salvage' QBs is done. It's either a guy who is a mid-tier QB who can bridge the gap for a rookie for a couple of years while keeping the club competitive or shell out the big bucks for a known commodity. Those are the options.

Both. It doesn't have to be a high price veteran and signing a FA doesn't prevent drafting one either. Lots guys available in FA with plenty of tread left on the tires and can be had reasonably. No need to get a top 5 TE in FA.

Please, please. please, please!!!! As soon as his jersey number is announced, IMMEDIATELY buying a jersey. I don't even care if it's a one-year rental.

Reich said in his presser yesterday that the TE coach would be named in 24-48 hours, so maybe some news on that front today. This needs to happen, because he also said the entire staff is assembling this week to assess the roster. The TE coach will be getting a bit of a late start.

The Colts got to the playoffs with Rivers. So your list is a bit skewed. It's all a risk, but saying drafting is less risky by listing FAs that have failed would be like me posting a page of first round QB busts to prove my point. I think if the coaches feel more comfortable getting a FA QB that they think would fit their system more so than a rookie first round QB, then so be it.

Amazing how people automatically assume drafting a first round QB is a shoo-in solution. It's an easy solution, but not even close to a sure thing. The recency bias of the QB success from the 2020 draft is skewing people's perception of YEARS of data showing extremely high bust rates among first round QBs. In a typical year, ONE QB--at most, drafted in the first ends up not being a bust. So either we have to be damn sure we get the correct one or hope this QB class is not a typical year.

How about reasonably priced vets like Brissett or Minshew who have experience in Indy/Philly systems?

Word was we were going to cut him and Fitts still managed to swindle the Cardinals out of two draft picks. Any draft picks at all is amazing.

Chosen Anderson? More like yaknowwhatimean Anderson.

If he's already here, why the hold up I wonder?

Any background with TEs per chance?

That could be and he could be more consistent too.

I did--foot in mouth scenario or possibly just spitballing. Irsay is a moron, but I think he knows that EVERYONE knows they are looking to draft a QB. No secret there. Even our own GM has all but said we are seriously looking to draft a QB. Again, no secret there.

Who knows with Irsay? I'm just saying, Peyton, Luck--took a shot at Carson Wetnz. Dude likes tall pocket passers. Maybe he's evolving with the League, but it would shock me if Young is truly his QB1 this draft.

Info 'leaked' out this early is likely misinformation. They are taking a QB, but I bet we will see multiple reports/leaks contradicting one another as time goes on. Levis seems like a Jim Irsay guy. This may be bait to get the Colts to bite and trade up a couple spots with the Texans and Houston still gets the QB they really want at #4.

Good, maybe he will light a fire under Moore's butt and get the most out of TMJ/Shi Smith. Moore is so frustrating. He just meanders throughout the season and teases us with a superb game sprinkled in here and there while going nearly unnoticed in many others.

Never got a Pro Bowl nod AND started less than 50 games (roughly 3 season). I mean losing the starting gig in 3 years should be enough, but they added no Pro Bowls and as seen this year, it's not too difficult to get to the Pro Bowl--you just can't completely suck apparently.

I think that would be the ultimate hatchet-burying move for this board. We get a QB, didn't have to move up, actually moved back to get more picks. I'd be ok with AR if we moved back, just not at #9. We need more picks this year and we may have a QB more polished sitting there next year within striking distance to move up. Drafting AR, as completely as raw as he, does not preclude us drafting another next year if a franchise QB can be had.

Pretty high and again, I...don't...care. FYI, busts generally only apply to first rounders...little technicality there. I want to sit out this draft--entirely--at QB, but would be okay with a slight move up for one of the top two. You are saying the first rounders are better than 3rd rounders, up is not down and cats don't like dogs or some silly thing like that.

Good thing we don't want a first round RB!

Top 10 QB picks on original draft team was the metric I was using. Somehow 3rd-7th in a draft year came up. Obviously the percentages goes down, but what position doesn't? I found a year-2014 that had three guys start successfully for their teams later in the draft. Was it 3rd-7th? No, but who cares--dumb and arbitrary parameters you set forth to somehow make your point. Higher draft picks tend to do better, you don't say? Anyway, I do the digging and you ask rhetorical questions. Do your own research, for one, and two, you will see the folly of moving up at all costs for QBs. Strategically moving up is fine, but not at all cost because of irrationally impatient fans. I've stated today that I'd be willing to go up to #5 if one of the two is still there. Moving to #3 or #1 is--I'll plainly say it--STUPID.

The Browns got so tired of swinging and missing they went out and gave a pervy-molester the richest QB contract in NFL history, lol!!!!

You moved the goalposts (in bold), not me. So if we are moving goalposts--2014 for the win! Thank you and good night!!!