45catfan

Is it just me or are our key players looking like they are only going like 90% today? Big night out in Hot-lanta last night?

Involve Shenault more please.

I have to say that was a sloppy route by Marshall. Didn't sell the inside at all and had zero sudden movement.

A lot of that is on Moore. On the deep pass Moore took his foot off the gas. PJ isn't spot on, but Moore isn't at the top of his game either. I want to see Shenault involved.

They'll be over in 2 weeks for two more years.

There's our backup swing tackle for next year to replace Erving. If we can re-sign Bozeman, our OL will be intact for next year. Fitts won't even have to touch the OL in the offseason...well outside of camp bodies, but you all know what I mean.

Exactly what Rhule absolutely drools over. Does Ryan have any college eligiblity left? Watch out, big man on campus next August, Matty Ice!

Is there be a daily limit on starting threads? No? Well, there ought to be!!!

How about in the is context: 'Go tank yourself' or' you mother tanker' or 'you stink like tank'. Is it a dirty word now?

Wouldn't that have been ironic since we could have had him all the way up to the 5th round! Lol!

We have six OL under contract next season. If we can re-sign Bozeman for cheap, that will be seven. Honestly we can draft a swing tackle on day three and acquire a undrafted /dirt cheap FA guard, our OL is set! Wow, that feels freaking odd because our OL had been a train wreck for so long.

Christmas eve could end up being the Will Levis Bowl between us and the Lions.

Bingo. We'd actually be doing the dude a favor. He's getting paid anyway, at least do him a solid and allow him to get paid while going to a better team that can compete. Burns would waste 2-3 of his prime NFL years here suffering through a rebuild.

If we were on the cusp on contending, I'd say we keep him, but we need so much help all over this roster that one player alone can't put this team on his shoulders. I'm good either way, but dang if that haul isn't eye candy.

What if I said we could get a QB in the 2nd round that currently has almost identical stats to Hooker?

Yeah, I'm super torn on this matter. I think everyone wants to keep Burns, but his HUGE payday around the corner and the haul in draft capital we could get for him...not to mention the much needed cap space is very hard to pass up.

Look at the Jets and how picking a QB about every year or so has worked out for them! Nobody doubts this team DESPERATELY needs a franchise QB, but desperation usually makes for bad mistakes.

It's too early in the season to study the top 10 prospects because they will shuffle a lot before the end of the season. I will say stats sometimes don't tell the entire story, but most of the time, numbers don't lie. I'm not saying the kid is horrible, but is he worth a top 10 pick if it comes to that? Right now, I would say no.

It's literally a crap shoot at QB. Even taking the #1 overall prospect at QB guarantees you zilch. The bust rate of QBs is crazy. I get the concept you can't be scared to take a swing and miss, but man, there's been a TON of swings that never connected.

I still think my guy McCall will end up around QB7 by draft day.

Why, because he 6'6"? His TD to INT is pretty bad. If he's struggling to hit 2:1 in college, what makes you thik he's going to improve upon that in the NFL? He's not overly athletic and the ball doesn't jump out of his hand. Perfect example of why NOT to draft a QB just because he's sitting on the draft board and it's a need.

The middle of this QB draft class pack will shuffle greatly in the coming 3 months.

Just saying weirder things have happened. Also, drafting a QB just for the sake of drafting one seldomly works out. If the available guy(s) at the correct value are not the player the new staff wants, then they won't pull the trigger. If we miss out on Stroud and Levis, I'm not sure the team goes all in on Young or Hooker.

If we land outside of the top 10, it may not be a 100% given QB is the pick.

Typical Clemson product.