45catfan

I predict Baker misses about 5 games and the Panthers keep his salary at $4.9 million. Am I right?

This dude has been banned countless times for the same thing...trying to apply numerology to predict outcomes of the Panthers' fortunes.

IOL, DE and LB depth. Obviously CMC staying healthy as well as other key players. Our coaching staff being able to make in-game adjustments.

He's baaaaack.

In other braking news, the sun is hot. People have been asking the Panthers to drop this charade for a few weeks now. Thank goodness it's over.

Tecklenburg is expendable and certainly will be signed to the PS. Bozeman, Elflein and Mays all can play center. Actaually, so can Erving in a pinch and has in his past. Teck can't play OT. Again, the only reason Erving is cut is for salary cap room, not because any of the bubble guys are better than him.

I agree almost entirely. I don't see keeping 11 DBs while only keeping 6 LBs. I think we pick up a DE after cuts. We are really thin there. I'd also like to acquire another IOL and LB after cuts too.

Could be, but if you add up all the O-linemen, that would be keeping one-dimensional guards over Erving that can play multiple positions, namely LT. Granted he's not great at any of them, but Jordan, Brown and Horton over him? Eh, I don't see it. Not unless it's purely for salary cap room.

The only coaches getting the axe is if things go south quickly and Tepper demands changes, but that won't happen. You know it won't be Snow either.

There's no rush at this time. During the season, it would have to be a quick decision, but not this early. Corral is heading to IR, it's just how the team wants to handle it--whether they feel they need him back or he's able to come back versus having to cut a guy they want to keep on the 53 man roster just to send Corral to IR as soon as the roster is set and hope said player clears waivers in order to re-sign him.

I don't think we keep 11 DBs. Plus, even if we do only keep two QBs, I think the extra spot goes to a WR. The guys on the bubble at WR have more potential impact for the team than an extra corner.

And may not until the initial 53 is made. If a player goes to IR before the 53 man roster is set, he is out for the entire year without the ability to come back. It wouldn't shock me that Corral makes the initial 53 man roster before heading to IR so he could come back later in the season when healthy enough.

Double post.

I like Robinson over Chandler and we aren't keeping six safeties. Hartsfield will take a safety spot. Who is Barnes supplanting to be CB #5? Taylor? STO? I don't see him sticking over both of those guys. Let me rephrase, shouldn't stick over both of those guys.

The cap hit is double that for Erving. I'd rather let him play out his remaining year. Plus, that gives us more options on the left side if the injury bug bites. I'd rather keep Erving than Daley. Honestly, we probably keep both. Pleasants is PS material. Mays has more potential and is plug and play anywhere on the right side of the line. The other guards, Brown, Horton and Jordan are just that...guards. They all are expendable. If any of those dudes make it over Mays, I'll be pissed...because they suck at the one job they do have, not to mention no versatility.

Including guys he recruited and wanted to recruit to those schools, you might be correct.

He can play multiple positions, which is key and one other major reason is this: That is the 6th highest cap figure on the entire team. Like Darnold, it makes more sense to keep him as backup than cut him.

With that pesky Corral kid out of the picture, I guess PJ is considered a lock now.

There are ten of them: seven Temple and three Baylor. Anderson, Ioannidis and Roy are locks. The rest are bubble guys or outright cuts. They are: Tecklenburg, Barnes, Chandler, Frankllin, Kirkwood, Thompson and Walker. I don't think Rhule will allow all of the fringe guys to be cut even though they probably should. It's a security blanket with his Bear-Owls surrounding him. I'll set the total number (including the three locks) at over/under 6.5 to make the final 53 man roster.

Hayes is too short and we just picked him up off the streets. If the staff is intrigued by him, they can sign him to the practice squad after cuts. Nobody is picking him up on waivers.

At RIGHT tackle too. Cross has had mixed reviews out of Seattle as well. Rookie OTs typically have growing pains, it is not uncommon.

DBs: Chinn, Woods, Burris, Robinson, Hartsfield, Jackson, Horn, Henderson and Taylor. If we keep 10, STO gets the last spot.

Easy PS stash with Wright, no need to burn a 53 man spot. The same with Saunders and Rambo. It comes down to Kirkwood and Zlystra, we won't keep both unless we cut someone unexpected. I mean, if Shi Smith can solidify return duties we don't need to keep Roberts. Dude is 34 years-old on a cheap one-year deal for return duties. He's not here for his WR skills. Outside of P, K and LS I don't like keeping "specialty" dudes that eat up another roster spot.

Probably some homer UNC fans going out of their way to knit-pick a former Wolfpack product.

If we only keep two QBs, then perhaps we will keep either an extra WR or TE. Zlystra will find a spot. Kirkwood possibly. Other than that, there are some guys that may land on the practice squad. Slightly off subject, but let's go over to the OL. The first 8 are locks...but we usually keep 9 or 10. Who do you got? I mean, between Daley, Jordan, Brown, Pleasants, Horton and Tecklenburg, I would rather not keep any of them. I'd prefer to cut all of these guys and search the waiver wire for another guy or two. If forced to keep one, I guess Daley would stick around. Locks: Ickey, Moton, Bozeman, Corbett, BC, Elflein, Erving, Mays. Yes, Mays is a lock.