Moo Daeng

They famously didn't tank in how they won and gave up the 1st pick.

They have a ten already. They can just keep him as a dirt cheap competent backup.

They must read the huddle and threads about trading for John Wolford.

It refreshing to see someone here with a cerebral vs emotional chaos contribution.

In case you didn't know this, the point is not to suck. I'm not sure why you are constantly wanting your team to lose. It's a really awkward desire.

I notice everyone throwing tantrums but I'm pretty happy we haven't yet thrown 3 fuging firsts to acquire one.

The obsession with this qb draft class is getting preposterous.

such drama

Yeah, this coupled with him trying to force his way out of his new contract already doesn't give me great feelings about his character. Though again, it's just my hunch not a verdict.

I tend to think he's not innocent. I don't dish out legally binding judgements though.

Just skip the entire judicial process and dish out punishment is a hell of a take. You aren't making a lick of sense.

Except Mike Mamula actually produced at BC. He had 12 sacks as a Junior playing OLB and 17 sacks as a senior playing DE. This guy had zero this year.

That's taking it a bit far. That's what the trial(s) determine.

I don't believe any of these numbers are accurate though.

At that weight he better be a pass rushing machine but he's not. 6' 250lbs, maybe he should try running back with those measurables?

Looks to be a phenomenal athlete with little production.

Cue the internet dude's who think they Newsflash for you. He knows more about it than you or anybody else here.

Certainly not an awful place to start from given where we were

Regardless, just don't expect a sincere response for any issues you bring up with management. The individual is judged not the situation.

But did chose to blame me when I mentioned it. I simply thought they might care to know.

Good point. Regardless, the Huddle as an entity is not receptive to any sort of criticism. It's always been pretty stubborn and I don't expect this request to be given any sort of genuine consideration. The default response is to blame or be antagonistic toward the individual bringing it up.

No take at all at this point.

I know perfectly well how it works as that's the field I've worked in for the last 20 years. This is was Igo said too at the time but didn't bother to reply once I added the following: There is a simple way to test this by either clearing your browser caches or using incognito mode. Neither made any difference. The only thing I had been reading at the time was mainstream news sources.....and for my own development I have to clear caches countless times a day when testing certain things. If these ads were tightly targeted based on recent history I would get nothing but bicycle parts at the moment. I don't have any on this forum but do see them on other sites. All I got now is dishwashers and Buicks. The ads here have always been on the intrusive and loose end of the spectrum. That's nothing new.

Air yards, not field yards. Geometry comes into play when the pass is not going perfectly perpendicular to the point of release.

This is the forum that ran ads for tactical terrorist gear the week after Jan 6. Good luck