Jump to content

PleaseCutStewart

HUDDLER
  • Posts

    7,784
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

PleaseCutStewart's Achievements

Grand Master

Grand Master (14/14)

  • Conversation Starter
  • Dedicated Rare
  • Very Popular Rare
  • Reacting Well Rare
  • First Post

Recent Badges

5.1k

Reputation

  1. As long as we have DB, odd man fronts are the way to go for us. We want to line DB up between the guard and tackle (4i-tech) because of how quick he is off the snap and his punch on the guard off the snap. If anyone is wondering why he pretty much has to be doubled (or combo blocked) just about every snap, its because he is lined up in that spot in our odd man front. If we change to an even front, it becomes a lot harder to have DB play the 4i-tech. Not sure if I would say Evero likes smaller NTs - I wouldn't call Bobby Brown a small NT by any sense. I think we run a 1-tech NT, so they are usually getting double teamed (or combo blocked) by concept alone. I actually think Bobby Brown did a pretty good job of eating blocks and being positionally sound on most runs at him (not his fault we were rocking ass LBs last year + Wharton being god awful). The bigger problem came on the toss plays/outside runs where DB wasn't able to blow it up in the backfield (i.e., the Bills game). Lloyd should help with the run D and getting a rangy LB in the draft will definitely help. There are also some good 1-tech DTs (and 0-techs) that can be instant day 1 starters for us in the draft.
  2. If it can work in Bojack Horseman, it can work for us!
  3. He is definitely the type of LB we need for passing downs
  4. There is a lot to love about Rodriguez, but I still worry about him against the run. He will pretty much have to rely on the DL to eat up blocks because I think he is going to have a hard time fighting off blocks and making tackles.
  5. We honestly don't even run 3-4 very much. I think we played nickel/big nickel like 60% of our downs last year (and probably like 15% more in dime). Now, we do primarily (possibly always) run odd man fronts in all of our sets. So that would be an interesting choice of switch if we decide to run all of our formations out of even fronts next season. I can't see us doing that because 1) many of our current players are built for odd man fronts, and 2) most prospects do best in odd man fronts.
  6. Finally we get the sequel for Little Giants that we all wanted
  7. Checks out - he meets the #1 goal of being under 5'10"
  8. Of all the receivers to compare Concepcion to, that was certainly a choice... Could Concepcion be a bust? Sure. Is he anything like Philly Brown? Outside of also playing WR, no.
  9. I mean... Seeing as how it will probably only take 1 snap in practice for Brooks to get injured, I'm guessing our staff knows we need another RB while continuing to develop Etienne.
  10. I feel like walterfootball was ok when it first started like 30 years ago because it was like the only mock draft site around. Now they are somewhere between Kiper and a flaming bag of crap
  11. BPA among edge, LB, CB, WR, OT, or S (if Downs/Thieneman are there). I will say corner because I think Terrell will be available at 19
  12. Was Bailey that low in December? Feel like he shot up like a quarter of the way through the season. Styles is one that was low because he plays ILB. After the freakish combine he had + his results at Ohio st, he shot up the boards
  13. Looks like another mock draft guy that is completely clueless. I feel confident we aren't taking a WR at 19 that is made of glass and will be lucky to play like half the games each season
  14. This right here... And the NFL is all for it when they keep putting the refs that are the absolute worst in key games/playoff games
  15. Honestly, outside of the big fugup on the fail mary, the replacement refs were as good, if not better, than the regular refs
×
×
  • Create New...