
Bama Panther
HUDDLER-
Posts
1,315 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Huddle Wiki
Forums
Gallery
Everything posted by Bama Panther
-
This has become my favorite uni combo. Looks so clean, despite the actual play that goes along with wearing them.
-
The Arena Football League called and wants its uniforms back.
-
Team Cap Space: $35,099,731 (per OTC)
Bama Panther replied to SetfreexX's topic in Carolina Panthers
It’s nowhere close to the $170M or whatever (for the whopping 26 players that were under contract) people were touting a couple weeks ago. Many failed to realize that cap space number was so big due to the low number of players the Panthers had under contract for next season. -
Panthers agree to 1-year deal with RB Rico Dowdle
Bama Panther replied to UNCrules2187's topic in Carolina Panthers
But why would a contender trade their RB-1B to another contender? -
AKA a cancer.
-
Already did that.
-
He’s about to. It’s just going to be with a new team.
-
Daniel Jeremiah: watch what the Panthers do tomorrow
Bama Panther replied to TheSpecialJuan's topic in Carolina Panthers
I don’t how know I feel about Jaycee getting the NFL’s highest ever DB contract at $25M per, given his injury history. -
Can’t get down with this. We loved our three-year assignment in San Antonio and the plan has been to retire in TX when my military time is done (plan may be changing though). Outstanding state parks in the hill country north and west of San Antonio, and while it feels like your living on Satan’s ass from May to early October, the weather the rest of the year is pretty great.
-
NHL Radio just mentioned that someone in the know tweeted that “there’s another storm brewing” after the Mikko to Dallas trade is finalized. NHL Radio takes it as Carolina has another deal lined up before the deadline.
-
Seriously, F this dude. Be pissed at Colorado for trading you, not Carolina for trading for you. And if you don’t want to be in Carolina, don’t sabotage deals they are trying to make to get you out of Raleigh.
-
That 2026 cap space number is considering only 26 players under contract. The Panthers will not go into next offseason with only 26 players under contract. That cap space number is going to get much smaller.
- 55 replies
-
- 1
-
-
- fowler
- dan geaziano
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
I was thinking Sweat also, but then I thought about how difficult it would be to choose one of the DL over the other DL. That’s why I said my vote would be Hurts (very efficient game at the highest profile position).
-
Who wins MVP? My vote would be for Hurts.
-
Or the Niners to the Broncos.
-
Much like the Panthers during the Tepper era, the Charlotte NBA organization, since its rebirth (Bobcats/Hornets), has done absolutely nothing to instill fan confidence in the moves they make.
-
The Hornets front office perpetually has no idea what they are doing.
-
Nice opening to the third!
-
TBH, I’m not sure any team is going to breakthrough in the AFC as long as Mahomes and Reid are in KC. With Reid’s run in Philly followed by his run in KC, I’d give him the mantle as GOAT coach over Belichick.
-
It’s very akin to a “Dungy in Tampa” or “Marvin Lewis in Cincinnati” situation. Those Bucs and Bengals teams could get to the playoffs but just never could break through.
-
I’ve never bought into your argument that neither ref could see the ball. Moot point now, but there is no way the guy with a view of Allen’s back should have been the one to spot the ball in that instance, especially given the fact that the other ref had a different spot. They should have come together to discuss the difference.
-
You’re being intentionally obtuse. We’ve all seen plays where one ref comes in for the spot and another overrules, in the common meaning of that word. That is exactly what happened here. It had nothing to do with who gets the ball. Also, “what does seeing Allen’s face vs back have any bearing on it”? The ball was on the same side of Allen’s body as his face, not on the same side as Allen’s back. If the whole point is to see the ball in relation to the line to gain, one viewpoint obviously gives a better chance to do that.
-
Again, so why should the ref who had a view of Allen’s back get the benefit to overrule the other? If either did see the ball, which one would it have been?
-
KC O lineman knocked Rousseau’s (I believe is who it was) helmet off with a hand to the face. No call.
-
That’s a great question, especially when the ref who overruled had Allen’s back to him. Tell me: which of the refs could potentially have seen the spot if the ball, the ref seeing the front of Allen or the ref seeing Allen’s back?