SCO96

If Christian is healthy in 2021, he'd be a beast in SF with a run oriented coach like Kyle Shanahan...especially if he had a solid back to share the workload.

That scenario really worries me. Three years in a row w/out a player in the top 32 is bad for a team with as many holes as Carolina. Donte was our only CB last year to get an INT...SERIOUSLY. Look it up if you don'ty believe me. And, give up our best all around weapon on offense. Easy pass. PS- I think Robbie is a great additon to the team, but WR is probably the easiest skill position to replace in the draft. With Tepper's Pittsburgh connections, he needs to put a spy in the Steeler front office and find out which mid round receiver they like...then pick him . Let's be honest, Pittsburgh finds solid (and replace solid), recievers as easy as we replace out toothbrushes,

The differing opinions on this board make it a fun place to visit. Things are always lively here and most of the time we are all pretty civil to one another. That said, I HATE this deal and would never consider it. Assuming Christian is healthy now, we'd be giving away 4 starters and two #1 picks in back to back years. Anderson was our leading receiver last year and when healthy Christian is arguably the most versatile back in the NFL. Teddy isn't great, but he can win games for you in this league. And, Burns is one of the best young pass rushers in the league. He had almost 1/3 of our sacks (9 out of a team total of 29). Sure, we'd have Watson, but outside of DJ, who is gonna throw it to? Who's gonna replace Burns sack total? Mike Davis is good, but is he who we want to build the running game around going forward? Those guys would have to be replaced. It wouldn't so be bad if we were so deep that the answers were already on the roster. Unfortunstely, they're not. It's a lot harder to replace them or address other roster needs w/out 1st round draft choices in back to back years. If they said 2 #1 picks and Teddy...that's hard to turn down. But, I'm not giving away the other starters for a QB , despite being good, has had two ACL surgeries before age 26.

I agree with this completely. A big reason a lot of these 1st round guys do end up busting is teams reaching on these prospects. Do a thorough evaluation and you should be able to avoid more of those busts. I agree with BOTH of You. In fact,that's why I'm gung-ho of taking any of the QB's after Lawrence in round one. This draft seems pretty deep. I'd love to get a couple of o-lineman, and possibly at least two defensive starters out of this draft. Build a better team on both sides of the ball and we probably could get our franchise guy NEXT YEAR via the draft, trade, or free agency. Whoever we got would be more likely to succeed because he'd have a better supporting cast.

If Indy hadn't traded for Wentz the Colts may have been a good fit for him. The O-line only gave up 19 sacks with an older/immobile Phillip Rivers at the QB spot.

I agree with everything in this post. You seem to be of the opinion that we "may" be better off not attempting to address the QB situation in the first round and instead fill the most urgent needs. I personally wouldn't offended if we took the best player at any of the positions you listed at 8 with the exception of Safety.

As I said earlier, I've only seen him play twice and I didn't see anything to set off any red flags. He definitely seem to be better than a couple of the QB's that preceded him at BAMA and some of the guys you listed above. I enjoyed reading your post. You seem well informed. I'm skeptical about BAMA QB's in general. I can't put my finger on it, but for some reason I think this guy may be the exception. If he goes to a team with good coaching and solid O-line, he could end up being the 2nd best QB in the 2021 draft class.

https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2021/02/21/charlie-weis-mac-jones-has-the-two-most-important-components-of-a-quarterback/ Just wanted to throw this up to see what you guys think. Charlie Weis seems to think Mac Jones is gonna light it up in the NFL. I can't say I feel the same way. Weiss is the guy who said Brady Quinn would become a star QB in the pros. Still, he did coach Brady during the early years and helped lay the foundation for the most accomplished QB in NFL history. I'll post a little of the article below. --- "Although more young quarterbacks are landing on the right side of the pass/fail test than ever before, there’s still no crystal ball when it comes to figuring out which ones will be the best. The top two picks in 2015 were supposed to be sure things; they weren’t. Ditto for 2016. Every draft has one or more quarterbacks to whom we can now point and say, “Oops.” “Oops” can be said in a bad way, and in a good way. One guy for whom “oops” eventually could be said in a good way is Alabama quarterback Mac Jones. Currently not at the top of the stack of prospects, former Patriots offensive coordinator and Notre Dame head coach Charlie Weis thinks he could be. “What are the two most important components of a star quarterback?” Weis told Mike Reiss of ESPN.com. “They have the ‘it’ factor. And they’re accurate. That’s who he was.” “When you talk about Trevor Lawrence, what makes him so special is that he can do everything Mac Jones can and he’s athletic,” Weis said. “[Justin] Fields, really good player. Zach Wilson, really good player. The kid from North Dakota State [Trey Lance], really good player. . . . But this guy, [Jones], he’s the one making all the plays. All he does is win and throw completions.” ---- I've only seen him play Florida and Ohio State. He looked ok to me in both games. I have no idea how he did at the Senior Bowl. If we can't get a QB in round 1 or a FA this offseason, do you take a chance on him if he's available in round 2?

You apparently think along the same line as I do. But I could see doing two #1, and Teddy if I really thought we could put together an offense to suit his strong points and keep him upright. My problem with Wilson is his insistence on getting every penny that he can. He seems to have no problems taking up a huge percentage of the cap but then complains about not having enough pieces around him. You'd have to at consider the fact that you might not be able to resign or extend him without killing your cap space.

https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2021/02/22/report-teams-believe-three-first-rounders-the-base-for-any-russell-wilson-trade/?unapproved=7558345&moderation-hash=a1f87aa6b0c8bc71b982aff7dbf9f338#comment-7558345 Wilson said the question of whether he’s available in a trade is for the Seahawks to answer and teams have reportedly been asking. Michael Silver of NFL Media reports that one-third of the league has called the team about the possibility of a Wilson trade. Silver adds that those teams have come away with the belief that the starting point for any serious conversations would be three first-round picks. ------ If you could keep your current starters and not part with picks 2-7 for the next three seasons, is that a deasl worth considering?

I'd take the 2003 WR corp (Muhammed, Smith, and Proehl) over the 2020 squad any day of the week. I've actually agree that Teddy isn't a "franchise QB". I just think placing most of the blame for the 11 losses on him without acknowledging the other role the other weaknesses played is a bit unfair. I also don't believe mortgaging our future draft choices and legit starters for one QB (FA or draft choice) is they way to build a solid contender with all of our roster holes. We are more than a QB away from competing for a NFC title.

I've never seen Teddy as a upper tier starter in the NFL. I'd love to see an upgrade like the rest of you. But, I think the Teddy hate on this site at times is a little over the top. He's only played 13 games or more 3 times in his career due to his career threatening injury in 2017. Despite his lackluster TD to INT ratio (15-11) he missed the 4,000 yard mark by less than 300 yards. He played behind a offensive line that was mediocre at best. He didn't have the best offensive weapon on the team (CMC) due to his injures. The defense allowed over 25 points per game. Only one player on defense had more than 5 sacks. Only one CB had an interception the entire season. He definitely blew some opportunities to pull some games out down the stretch. He's not a franchise guy who can put a team on his shoulders and carry them for long periods. But, I don't think he deserves all the blame he's getting for last year's 5-11 record. I have always looked at him as a bridge (no pun intended) until we get OUR GUY. If everyone stays healthy and we have a strong draft class we could be knocking on the door for a playoff spot next season and possibly take control of the NFC South when Brady, Brees, and Ryan ride off into the sunset.

No way you get rid of Burns. We only had 29 sacks last year. He had 9 of them. He hasn't even entered his prime yet. Pass rushers...on rookie contracts...are arguably the most coveted defensive players in a pass happy NFL.

If the rebuild is going to be successful in Carolina, I expected the team to make a strong playoff run in year 3 or 4...not year two. We had a strong draft last year. Despite our 11 losses, we literally had a chance to win 8 of those games on our last possession...and we did that with a fairly mediocre roster, no CMC, and an average QB. Those players from the 2020 draft should get better in 2021. But, we still have some big holes on the team roster. Donte Jackson was the only CB to get an INT last year. The team only had 29 sacks last year. One player (Brian Burns) had 9 of them. Our O-line is below average. We need to have another strong draft to address those issues. If we nail the 2021 draft we could pick up another 3 or 4 starters. We'd then be in position to give up some picks to move up in the 2022 draft to nab a guy or make a run at a veteran via trade or Free Agency. If we can improve the o-line, secondary, and add pass rusher I really believe Carolina would be a desirable destination for a veteran QB in 2022 I wouldn't give up all those picks for D. Watson (who I love as a QB) or Wilson, Fields, or Lance. We need to stay put. As for QB, I'd ride with Teddy (Shudder). Besides, if he had a better O-line, a healthy CMC, better defense, and the knowledge that we all want to move on to another guy, it may light a fire under him and actually make him play better.

There is no way I'd ever give up that much draft captital to move up 5 spots and take a QB who isn't the clear cut best QB in his draft class. Secondly, I would never take a QB out of Ohio State in the first round. I'm still waiting for someome to name an accomplished QB out of that school in the last 50 years. I would wish Fields well and hope to be proven wrong since I'm a Panther fan, but would not leave draft night feeling with very low expectations if the Panthers made such a move.

While I agree with most of what you said, it is easier to throw the ball more efficiently. 1) Terry Bradshaw literally said "1978 was the year the NFL legalized holding" Prior to that lineman couldn't extend their arms to pass block. 2) Tackles are allowed to be partially in an upright stance now to get a jump on speed rushers and slow down the pass rush. They had to be in 3 point stance when I was growing up. 3) Receivers can only be hit only in the initial 5 yards of their routes now. Back in the day you could literally knock the guy down during the route as long as the ball wasn't in the air when you did it. I think that's a bit barbaric myself, but I think extending that contact zone to 7-10 yards would make things a bit harder. 4) QB's get much more roughing calls today & are better protected by officials. I read an interview with Roger Staubach years ago. He said he saw P. Manning get a flag for a hit during a MNF game. He jumped out of the chair when he saw it. He said "I got hit like that every game!" Pass rushers have to literally slow up and watch they way they hit a guy to avoid a flag. Careers are lasting longer b/c QB's don't get hit as much. 5) I think PI is called pretty well in terms of defensive contact. But, WR's are routinely allowed to push off with little consequence...especially down field. A receiver has to blatantly push off to get a flag now. If a guy can't throw the ball it doesn't matter if he has the new rules or not. But, an accurate guy can thrive in today's game if he has a good supporting cast.

I think the NFL know exactly what they've done. Their intent was to drive up scoring and that is exactly what has happened. The prolific statistics we see every year are a result tilting the game in favor of the offense. During the 1977 season Drew Pearson led the league in receiving with 870. He's the last guy to win the crown with less than 1,000. Some of us old school guys like a good defensive slug fest. The general public...not so much. Most casual fans I spoke with after the last Rams/Pats Super Bowl absolutely HATED that game. They thought it was boring. The Eagles/Pats 41-33 game more to their (and the NFL's liking). With even female fans hooked on fantasy football things will never go back to the old days. If defenses EVER get an advantage, the rules committee will find a way to negate it. I am surprised that QB is so bad at times. The league has made it so much easier to throw the ball these days.

You raise an interesting point about drafting Mond (or another guy for that matter) after the 2nd round. A lot of people feel that you can only find a "franchise guy" in the first two rounds. I disagree. While the guys drafted higher have a greater chance of success, we do have examples of guys who have become solid starters in the league in rounds 3 thru 5. Tom Brady was a 6th round pick. Tony Romo and Kurt Warner were UNDRAFTED and both guys had successful NFL careers. I think those later round guys may be less talented upon entering the NFL. But, here's the question we all need to ask. Are coaches capable of grooming the players drafted later into quality starters? Hidden gems are found in every round in the drafted and even among the undrafted players. I think in some years you can find some QB's there is well. The one thing you can't really see on film is the willingness to accept good coaching and the will to succeed. I think some potential starters been written off by teams b/c of their draft slot and and never got a real opportunity to grow into a solid QB.

I'm surprised our defense ranked as high as it did last season. Our defense had 29 sacks last year. Brian Burns had 9 (a respectable total) of them which is almost a one-third of our team total. Efe Oboda had 5.5. Marquis Haynes had 4. Our DT's (Brown and Kerr) had a combined total of 4. Those numbers aren't going to get it done in today's pass happy NFL. I remember watching several games where it seemed that we just couldn't make the QB uncomfortable in the pocket. Too make matter worse the team only had 7 INT's. Donte Jackson had 3 of those...which is almost half. He was the only corner on the team with an interception in 2020. Four other defenders had 1 each, and one of those was a LB (Tahir Whitehead). Those numbers are terrible. The pass rush should complement the pass coverage and vice versa. We don't have enough talent to field a FORMIDABLE defense. I have no doubt our D-line will get better as the players age, but our secondary is in desperate need of a play-maker at CB. We could use a ball hawk at Safety to help out Chinn. And, none of the LB's on our roster are true difference makers. You don't have to account for them in the game-plan like you do with the guys in Tampa Bay If we can't get a QB at 8, I would have no problem with the team taking a CB, pass rusher, or even a LB to improve the defense...although a LT would be a very nice addition.

A lot of us on the Forum agree with you, but I would guess almost 50% feel like we have to get Wilson, Fields, or Lance THIS YEAR or franchise is forever doomed. All of these guys have question marks. Fields in from OHIO STATE...nuff said Wilson has nice numbers, but he really hasn't played against any elite programs from the power 5 conferences. That's not his fault, but it does leave some room for doubt. Lance didn't even play last year after he opted out of the spring FCS decision. Here's a link to a good article on him. I'll post a portion of the article below the link. https://247sports.com/Article/ESPN-Mel-Kiper-Jr-calls-Trey-Lance-most-fascinating-player-in-NFL-Draft-2021-North-Dakota-State-Football-160732511/ ESPN NFL Draft analyst Mel Kiper Jr. believes Lance is one of the most fascinating players in the draft. "That's the most fascinating player in the draft probably in a long time is Trey Lance because of the circumstances you had to deal with COVID," Kiper said on the latest First Draft podcast. “Only one football game they played. If you go back to that game, whether it was rusty or pressing, he did not throw the ball well. He was 15 of 30 against Central Arkansas, threw the first interception of his career. As I said, it was 15 of 17 starts he threw the ball 23 times or fewer. You had five games in 2019, 56.5 or less in terms of completion percentage. This is a ultimate leap of faith on talent. If you're taking Trey Lance and you're giving up all that to go up from eight to three to get him if you're Carolina Panthers. I get you're in a division with Atlanta. Matt Ryan can't be there forever. Tampa Bay, Brady not gonna be there forever, and New Orleans is still figuring out Taysom Hill. “So I get you want to find the quarterback you feel most strongly about. I understand that completely, if it's Trey Lance, great, do it. But Trey Lance, to me, the most difficult and the most fascinating player to evaluate, since I've probably been doing this and I've been doing it for 43 years." "I think Lance, all these quarterbacks can play right away, but he's got to sit for a year or two. He's 20 years of age. Doesn't turn 21 until early May, arguably the youngest player in this draft...So to me, he's got to sit, watch and learn. You have Teddy Bridgewater will be kind of that bridge to Trey Lance if you go that route." ---- If he's there at 8 I can see taking a chance. But, I'm not giving up several years of high choices to nab him at #2 or #3.

That "draft chart' bothers me. It over values the top 5-10 picks in comparison to the other slots. I could see giving up a 1, 3, and 4 in this year's draft to move up 6 spots if you felt Wilson was a sure thing. Or Maybe a 1,2, and 4. Why on earth do you have to give up a 1 and a 3 in the 2022 draft as well? Well, you have to because the "draft chart" says so. You have to make sure the other choices add up to the value total of the #2 slot. Maybe...just maybe...that #2 pick ain't worth all that and is actually overpriced. I vote no.

You're right about Florida State pass rushers, but a bust on the D-line won't set you back like a bust at the QB position. I won't tell you my exact age, but i'm old enough to remember the Bradshaw, Staubach, Stabler era of pro football. Tell me a an exceptional NFL QB out of Ohio State, Alabama, or Penn State since 1980. Outside of Carson Palmer give a good QB out of USC since 1980. If you take away Joe Montana (1979 draft), Notre Dame hasn't had a solid QB in the NFL since Joe Theisman and he played with the Redskins from the mid 70's thru the mid 80's. You just can't ignore things like that if you plan on drafting your next "Franchise QB", especially if you're willing to give up a boat load of draft choices to get him.

On offense the hardest position to fill beside QB is LEFT TACKLE. I think Sewell is more of a sure thing than any of the QB's not named Trevor Lawrence. I'm still baffled so many people on this board are willing to trade up lose draft choices for Justin Fields. Fields is product of Ohio State, that alone should disqualify us from taking him in the 1st round. Zach Wilson throws a nice ball. He put up some gaudy numbers. But, I don't think BYU even played a team from a power 5 conference this past season. All the teams I remember seeing on their schedule were from the Sun Belt, Moutain West, Big South, C-USA, conferences. That doesn't mean he won't be any good, but he isn't a sure thing either. I've always looked at our rebuild as taking 3-4 years to compete for a conference title. I think the world won't end if we continue to build a solid roster and get our future QB in another draft or acquire him thru a trade or free agency.

I heard Dak Prescott use that argument as well. Still, I think Brady would take less money even if he wasn't married to a super model. He seems to be obsessed with being the best AND winning titles. He realizes that's a lot more difficult middle and bottom half of the roster is stocked with below average/marginal players. Russell Wilson will have made $140 million on 3rd contract alone when it expires in 2023. He'll be 35 at that time. Would it ruin his financial future if he decided to take a fully guaranteed deal (ex 3 yr 60-75 million) on the condition that the team use the money to improve the overall roster. Let's be honest, neither he, nor his kids, nor his grandchildren, will ever spend the money that he's already earned.