ForJimmy

Even better!

If it’s not close to being resolved by draft day, we should just trade up and select Fields or Lance.

If they see him as a sexual predator who is assaulting women he should be cut. I would imagine this kind of thing can make part of his contract voidable. From a PR stand point cutting him (if found guilty) is the right thing to do.

We would have some speed with him and DJax! Jackson and Jackson.

We need some secondary and this defense should be solid!

Does this mean Burns is part of the Watson deal?

20m additional for a better QB. We were already paying around 20 for Teddy if we ditch him we subtract 20m (give or take) plus add 40m for Watson giving us a net increase of 20m which was stated at 10% of our projected salary cap next year.

The constant winners have franchise QBs. Do you need more than just a QB? Yes. Can you consistently complete with QBs like Teddy? Doubtful...

We will more than likely shed Teddy’s $20 million hit next year which would be over 10%. So we are looking at a 10% increase with far superior QB play. We will have money for FAs.

Which team that made a run in the playoffs was doing it with a subpar QB? Packers, Bucs, Chiefs, Bills were the final 4. Saints and Ravens are usually in the mix. It’s not coincidence that the teams who are constantly in the playoffs making runs have franchise QBs. Seahawks usually are and the Steelers. So yeah he was 4-12 last year one year away from a 10-6 season, beating the Bills in the Wild Card round and losing the Mahome led Chiefs.

IF he stays healthy, linebackers could be a strength of ours with Brown keeping linemen off of them.

If we trade CMC we def need to sign Samuel...

Not Chinn.... please!

This and draft a LT.

New owner, GM, Coach, Staff, and roster?

Wouldn’t Russell going to nearly any team do the same thing? A franchise QB makes most teams competitive...

Ok well this is such a “devastating” case. Tell Houston we take this “criminal” off their hands for a 4th maybe a 3rd if they are lucky....

So he asked her, she said no and that was the end? Also it’s going to be near impossible to prove this.

Watson is A, trade up for Fields or Lance is B.

It makes no sense. Would this not drive down how much teams are willing to trade for him? Imagine trading a ton of assets for him and this turns out to be true.

It’s a slippery slope. Then you get victims afraid they will lose the case and remain silent or worse get out lawyered by a rich person and get punishment as well as the assault that happened...